Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PacketViewer back button goes back to last target/packet #1809

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

ryan-pratt
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ryan-pratt ryan-pratt requested a review from ryanmelt January 3, 2025 18:02
@ryan-pratt ryan-pratt marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2025 18:04
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.58%. Comparing base (88de888) to head (2fc87ca).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1809      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.54%   79.58%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         517      517              
  Lines       40737    40737              
==========================================
+ Hits        32404    32420      +16     
+ Misses       8333     8317      -16     
Flag Coverage Δ
python 84.30% <ø> (+0.11%) ⬆️
ruby-api 48.64% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend 82.61% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 3, 2025

@ryan-pratt ryan-pratt merged commit 3ea7f59 into main Jan 8, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@ryan-pratt ryan-pratt deleted the bug/packetviewer-config branch January 8, 2025 16:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants