Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Use correct modbus addresses for Janitza UMG96RM(E) meter #2930

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

parapluplu
Copy link
Contributor

@parapluplu parapluplu commented Dec 17, 2024

Implementation used 8xx addresses which are programmable. Switched to 190xx addresses, which cannot change. See https://www.janitza.com/files/download/manuals/current/UMG96RM/E/janitza-mal-umg96rme-en.pdf page 19.

I've tested this change with two different setups
Setup 1: Meter was programmed in the 8xx address range and working before this change with OpenEMS. After this change it still worked.

Setup 2: Meter was not programmed in the 8xx address range and not working before this change with OpenEMS. After this change it worked.

Implementation used 8xx addresses which are programmable. Switched to 190xx addresses, which cannot change. See https://www.janitza.com/files/download/manuals/current/UMG96RM/E/janitza-mal-umg96rme-en.pdf page 19.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #2930      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      56.62%   56.62%   +0.01%     
- Complexity      9500     9501       +1     
=============================================
  Files           2251     2251              
  Lines          96049    96049              
  Branches        7090     7090              
=============================================
+ Hits           54374    54378       +4     
+ Misses         39675    39672       -3     
+ Partials        2000     1999       -1     

@sfeilmeier sfeilmeier requested a review from pooran-c December 18, 2024 10:18
@sfeilmeier
Copy link
Contributor

@pooran-c: Could you please review?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants