Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make OEO more OBO conform #1790

Open
1 task
stap-m opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 6 comments
Open
1 task

make OEO more OBO conform #1790

stap-m opened this issue Dec 18, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request meta issue Issue that collects information about topics and will be closed after detailled issues are solved. organisation Concerning the repository and GitHub related tasks

Comments

@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor

stap-m commented Dec 18, 2023

Description of the issue

OBO foundry has a couple of principles that are seen as good practise for interoperable ontologies.
I ran the OBO dashboard1 to check OEO against these principles. Many of them are not met due to small issues and could be fixed easily, see figure below.
The dashboard check might be a good quality reference for OEO.

grafik

Ideas of solution

Go through the principles and check errors in detail.

Workflow checklist

  • I am aware of the workflow for this repository

Footnotes

  1. https://oboacademy.github.io/obook/howto/deploy-custom-obo-dashboard/

@stap-m stap-m added enhancement New feature or request organisation Concerning the repository and GitHub related tasks To do Issues that haven't got discussed yet labels Dec 18, 2023
@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

stap-m commented Dec 18, 2023

For OBO registered ontologies, metadata is stored here. I fear, some of the principles can not be met because OEO cannot be registered.

@l-emele
Copy link
Contributor

l-emele commented Dec 18, 2023

Any reason why you checked the very old version 1.13.0 instead of the most recent version?

@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

stap-m commented Dec 18, 2023

Because I did the check half a year ago... but good point. I'll do an update.
EDIT: But I don't think there will be much change.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the To do Issues that haven't got discussed yet label Dec 18, 2023
@stap-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

stap-m commented Dec 18, 2023

I updated the dashboard run with version 2.0.1 (the recent version on OEP), see picture above.

@l-emele
Copy link
Contributor

l-emele commented Jan 11, 2024

One easy thing: We should add foaf:homepage <https://openenergy-platform.org/ontology/oeo> to oeo.omn.

@l-emele
Copy link
Contributor

l-emele commented Feb 1, 2024

To me, it is no always obvious what the problems are and how to solve this issue. Maybe it is a good idea to treat this issue as a meta issue and open separate issues for each of the checks where we got an error or a warning.

@l-emele l-emele added this to the Meta milestone milestone Feb 26, 2024
@stap-m stap-m added the meta issue Issue that collects information about topics and will be closed after detailled issues are solved. label Sep 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request meta issue Issue that collects information about topics and will be closed after detailled issues are solved. organisation Concerning the repository and GitHub related tasks
Projects
Status: In discussion
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants