Add Axiom to Final Energy Consumption Value - oeox paper quick fix

[nelekoehler]

Description of the issue

While working on the oeox paper, we noticed that the quantity value Final Energy Consumption does not yet have an axiom for its quantity. And since we want to distinguish more clearly between quantities and quantity values, I suggest that we call it 'Final Energy Consumption Value', since it is also the subclass 'energy consumption value'.
It is planned to revise the quantities and quantity values anyway (see #1510), but in the context of the paper, a start should be made at this point.

Ideas of solution

Final Energy Consumption Value
Subclass Of:
'is about' some 'energy'

and maybe we could already implement a quantity for energy consumption or final energy consumption, so that we can add a 'quantity value of' Axiom.
Defintions could be:

Energy Consumption Value: An energy consumption value is an energy amount value that expresses the magnitude of the energy consumption over a time span.
Final Energy Consumption Value: Final energy consumption value is an energy consumption value expressing the magitude of the energy delivered to and consumed by end users.
Energy Consumption: An energy consumption is an energy amount that measures the energy consumption over a time span.
Final Energy consumption: Final energy consumption is an energy consumption accounting for the energy delivered to and consumed by end users.

(What would be new is marked in italics. The definitions of the quantities correspond to those of the previous values and those of the quantity value have been adjusted accordingly. This corresponds to the suggestions I have also made for the other quantities and quantity values for restructuring.

[stap-m]

and maybe we could already implement a quantity for energy consumption or final energy consumption, so that we can add a 'quantity value of'

There is already consumption in OEO, but it is a process(!). We could add 'energy consuption value' and 'is about/quantity value of' some consumption instead. Or wait with the processes...

But I would like to propose something else:
final energy consumption Equivalent to 'energy consuption value' and 'is about' some (consumption and 'has participant' some 'final energy carrier')
EDIT: the same would be possible for primary energy consumption

[nelekoehler]

But I would like to propose something else: final energy consumption Equivalent to 'energy consuption value' and 'is about' some (consumption and 'has participant' some 'final energy carrier') EDIT: the same would be possible for primary energy consumption

Okay, I will do that, and I would also like to rename 'Final energy consumption' into 'Final energy consumption value' already and adjust the definition accordingly: 'Final energy consumption value is an energy consumption value expressing the magnitude of the energy delivered to and consumed by end users.', so that it fits to our definitions of quantity and quantity value. Are there any concerns or other suggestions?