Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in chapter 5, section 5.8 #495

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions explore-numerical.qmd
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1231,7 +1231,7 @@ terms_chp_05 <- c(terms_chp_05, "intensity map")
```

::: {.workedexample data-latex=""}
What interesting features are evident in the poverty and unemployment rate intensity maps in @fig-county-intensity-maps-3 and @fig-county-intensity-maps-4?
What interesting features are evident in the poverty and unemployment rate intensity maps in @fig-county-intensity-maps-1 and @fig-county-intensity-maps-2?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Expand All @@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ One observation that stands out when comparing the two maps: the poverty rate is
:::

::: {.guidedpractice data-latex=""}
What interesting features are evident in the median household income intensity map in @fig-county-intensity-maps-2?[^05-explore-numerical-14]
What interesting features are evident in the median household income intensity map in @fig-county-intensity-maps-4?[^05-explore-numerical-14]
:::

[^05-explore-numerical-14]: Answers will vary.
Expand Down
Loading