Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update deprecated imports from ovos-utils #36

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

fix: update deprecated imports from ovos-utils #36

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Nov 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated import statements for clarity and consistency.
    • Minor adjustments made to the logging format in the message handling process.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the ovos_messagebus/event_handler.py file, specifically updating import statements for clarity and minor adjustments to the on_message method. The import of Message has been changed to come from ovos_bus_client.message, and SessionManager has been moved to a new line. The logging format in the on_message method has been reformatted, but the core functionality, including message deserialization and error handling, remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
ovos_messagebus/event_handler.py Updated import of Message from ovos_utils.fakebus to ovos_bus_client.message; moved SessionManager import to a new line; reformatted logging in on_message method.

Poem

In the meadow where messages flow,
Imports now clearer, watch them glow!
With a hop and a skip, the code is refined,
Ensuring each error is gently aligned.
So here’s to the changes, both neat and spry,
A rabbit’s delight as we watch code fly! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3eac0f and 10d427a.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix and removed fix labels Nov 21, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
ovos_messagebus/event_handler.py (1)

66-68: Improve log message formatting for better readability

While the f-strings are a good improvement, the string concatenation could be more readable.

Consider this format:

-                LOG.debug(deserialized_message.msg_type +
-                          f' source: {deserialized_message.context.get("source", [])}' +
-                          f' destination: {deserialized_message.context.get("destination", [])}\n'
-                          f'SESSION: {SessionManager.get(deserialized_message).serialize()}')
+                LOG.debug(
+                    f"{deserialized_message.msg_type} "
+                    f"source: {deserialized_message.context.get('source', [])} "
+                    f"destination: {deserialized_message.context.get('destination', [])}\n"
+                    f"SESSION: {SessionManager.get(deserialized_message).serialize()}"
+                )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3eac0f and 10d427a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ovos_messagebus/event_handler.py (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
ovos_messagebus/event_handler.py (2)

20-23: Verify the new import locations are stable APIs

The migration from ovos_utils.fakebus to ovos_bus_client.message aligns with the PR objective to fix deprecated imports. Let's verify these are the canonical import locations.

✅ Verification successful

Import changes are correctly implemented

The verification shows:

  • No remaining deprecated imports from ovos_utils.fakebus
  • The new import from ovos_bus_client.message import Message is consistently used
  • SessionManager is correctly imported from ovos_bus_client.session
  • No conflicting import patterns were found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new import locations are widely used in the codebase
# and check for any remaining deprecated imports

# Check for any remaining deprecated imports
echo "Checking for any remaining deprecated imports from ovos_utils.fakebus..."
rg "from ovos_utils.fakebus import"

# Verify the new import pattern is consistent across the codebase
echo "Verifying new import pattern usage..."
rg "from ovos_bus_client.message import Message"

Length of output: 405


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if Message is consistently imported from ovos_bus_client.message
# by checking for any other import patterns of Message class

echo "Checking for other Message import patterns..."
rg "import.*Message" -g "!*.pyc" -g "!*.md"

# Also check if the SessionManager import is consistent
echo -e "\nVerifying SessionManager import pattern..."
rg "import.*SessionManager" -g "!*.pyc" -g "!*.md"

# Check if ovos_bus_client is the main package for these classes
echo -e "\nChecking package structure..."
fd "message.py|session.py" --type f

Length of output: 760


71-71: Verify the message emission change impact

The change to emit both msg_type and message object might affect existing event listeners.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the message handling implementation to understand the impact better.


Let me check one more thing to understand the message deserialization and event handling flow.


Message emission change is backward compatible

Based on the code analysis, the change is safe because:

  1. When filtering is disabled (self.filter = False), the message is emitted directly without modification
  2. When filtering is enabled, the deserialized message object contains both the message type and data, making the new emission pattern compatible with existing handlers
  3. The event handler implementation shows that listeners are registered with event names that match the message types
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing event listeners that might be affected by the emission change

# Look for event listeners in the codebase
echo "Checking for affected event listeners..."
rg "emitter\.on\(" -A 2

Length of output: 275


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of message handling and event emission
echo "Checking message handling implementation..."
rg "def emit" -A 5
rg "class Message" -A 10

Length of output: 1398


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check message deserialization and event handling implementation
echo "Checking message deserialization and event handling..."
rg "def on_message" -A 10
ast-grep --pattern 'class Message {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 920

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit 58c5674 into dev Nov 21, 2024
10 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the depre branch November 21, 2024 19:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant