-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(hardware_control): Fixing liquid probe bugs found in end to end testing #15619
Conversation
A PR has been opened to address analyses snapshot changes. Please review the changes here: https://github.com/Opentrons/opentrons/pull/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some style and consistency stuff to fix up. Also, let's get a nicer description in here.
…ad of returning False
…capture (#15629) This PR is an automated snapshot update request. Please review the changes and merge if they are acceptable or find your bug and fix it. Co-authored-by: aaron-kulkarni <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This all looks good to me assuming others' pending comments have been resolved. Some small final notes:
current_well = CurrentWell( | ||
pipette_id=pipette_id, | ||
labware_id=labware_id, | ||
well_name=well_name, | ||
) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, yep, that'd do it. Nice catch.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## edge #15619 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 60.12% 60.12%
=======================================
Files 190 190
Lines 10627 10627
=======================================
Hits 6390 6390
Misses 4237 4237
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Overview
These changes came from testing the end to end implementation of liquid level detection on the ot3 and fixing the bugs that came up.
Test Plan
Changed the unit tests to match new functionality.
Tested all new methods for liquid level detection on the ot3.
Changelog
Changes include:
Review requests
We are aware of a bug that even though we handle LLD exceptions at the protocol_context level, protocol_engine commands will still be marked as failed, so all future commands will fail. As far as I know for this PR, this only affects detect_liquid_presence on a well with no liquid. Another PR will be coming soon that addresses this.
Risk assessment
Medium? I'm not sure.