Merging develop to main #1
Conversation
…egistration screens
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant RegistrationComponent
participant RegistrarService
User->>RegistrationComponent: Fill out registration form
RegistrationComponent->>RegistrarService: Fetch necessary data
User->>RegistrationComponent: Submit form
RegistrationComponent->>RegistrarService: Submit beneficiary details
RegistrarService-->>RegistrationComponent: Confirm submission
RegistrationComponent-->>User: Display success message
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 46
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (32)
src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.spec.ts (1)
1-21: LGTM, but consider adding more test cases.The test file follows the standard Angular testing conventions and has a basic test case that checks if the component is created successfully.
However, to ensure comprehensive testing coverage, consider adding more test cases to verify the component's functionality, such as:
- Testing the component's template bindings and interactions.
- Testing the component's inputs, outputs, and event emitters.
- Testing the component's dependencies and services.
- Testing the component's error handling and edge cases.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.spec.ts (1)
1-21: Test specification looks good, but consider adding more test cases.The test specification follows the standard structure and conventions for Angular component testing. It sets up the testing module, creates an instance of the component, and includes a basic test case to ensure that the component is created successfully.
To further improve the test coverage, consider adding more comprehensive test cases that verify the component's behavior, such as:
- Testing the component's template bindings and user interactions.
- Mocking and testing the component's dependencies and services.
- Verifying the component's outputs and event emissions.
These additional test cases will help ensure the component's functionality and catch potential issues.
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.spec.ts (1)
1-24: LGTM! Consider adding more test cases.The test specification follows the standard structure and conventions for writing Angular component tests. The
beforeEachfunction is used correctly to set up the testing environment before each test case.The current test case is minimal and only checks if the component is created. Consider adding more comprehensive test cases to cover the component's behavior and interactions.
Tools
Biome
[error] 15-19: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.html (1)
27-36: Consider removing the commented code or implementing the functionality.The code segment for displaying an image and a message is currently commented out and not being used.
If this functionality is not required, consider removing the commented code to keep the template clean and maintainable.
If the functionality is intended to be used in the future, uncomment the code and ensure that the
messageInfoproperty is properly set in the component class.src/registrar/generate-abha-component/auth-method.html (2)
1-12: Consider moving the inline styles to a separate CSS file.The close button has inline styles that can be moved to a separate CSS file for better separation of concerns and maintainability.
Apply this diff to move the inline styles to a separate CSS file:
-<button - class="pull-right close-btn" - style="border: unset !important;background-color: unset !important;" - matDialogClose - (click)="closeDialogAuth()" - mat-icon-button -> +<button + class="pull-right close-btn" + matDialogClose + (click)="closeDialogAuth()" + mat-icon-button +>Then, add the following styles to a separate CSS file:
.close-btn { border: unset !important; background-color: unset !important; }
14-33: Consider moving the hardcoded radio group options to a separate configuration file.The radio group options are hardcoded and can be moved to a separate configuration file for better maintainability and reusability.
Apply this diff to move the hardcoded radio group options to a separate configuration file:
-<mat-radio-group - formControlName="modeofAuthMethod" - (change)="getAbhaAuthMethod()" -> - <mat-radio-button color="primary" value="AADHAAR_OTP" - >Aadhar</mat-radio-button - > - <mat-radio-button color="primary" value="AADHAAR_BIO" - >Biometric</mat-radio-button - > - <mat-radio-button color="primary" value="MOBILE_OTP" - >Mobile</mat-radio-button - > -</mat-radio-group> +<mat-radio-group + formControlName="modeofAuthMethod" + (change)="getAbhaAuthMethod()" +> + <mat-radio-button + *ngFor="let option of authMethodOptions" + color="primary" + [value]="option.value" + > + {{ option.label }} + </mat-radio-button> +</mat-radio-group>Then, add the following configuration to the component:
authMethodOptions = [ { value: 'AADHAAR_OTP', label: 'Aadhar' }, { value: 'AADHAAR_BIO', label: 'Biometric' }, { value: 'MOBILE_OTP', label: 'Mobile' }, ];README.md (2)
3-3: Excellent introduction, minor grammatical improvement suggested.The introduction provides a clear and concise overview of the registration page and its configurability. Well done!
Consider adding the article "the" before "registration page" to improve readability, as suggested by the static analysis tool.
-As registration is a common process across multiple AMRIT modules, registration page needs to be configurable based on the service line and project. +As registration is a common process across multiple AMRIT modules, the registration page needs to be configurable based on the service line and project.Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~3-~3: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... process across multiple AMRIT modules, registration page needs to be configurable based on ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
10-21: Informative building from source section, minor spelling correction suggested.The building from source section provides essential information for developers to set up the project. The prerequisites are clearly listed. Well done!
Consider using the official spelling "Node.js" instead of "Nodejs", as suggested by the static analysis tool.
-* Nodejs v18.10.0 +* Node.js v18.10.0Tools
LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Node.js”.
Context: ...g the MMU service: * JDK 17 * Maven * Nodejs v18.10.0 * MySQL(NODE_JS)
src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.html (2)
1-11: LGTM, but consider using a constant or an enum for the hardcoded value.The code segment is structurally correct and follows good practices like using optional chaining for the
currentLanguageSetobject.However, the close button click event binding passes a hardcoded value
'1'. Consider using a constant or an enum for this value to improve readability and maintainability.
28-35: LGTM, but consider using a constant or an enum for the hardcoded value.The code segment is structurally correct.
However, similar to the close button, the accept button click event binding passes a hardcoded value
'1'. Consider using a constant or an enum for this value to improve readability and maintainability.src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.spec.ts (1)
42-44: Test case looks good, but add more comprehensive tests.The test case is a simple smoke test that checks if the component can be created, which is a good starting point.
However, more comprehensive test cases should be added to test the component's behavior and edge cases, such as:
- Testing the component's interaction with the template
- Testing the component's methods and properties
- Testing the component's interaction with dependencies (services, router, etc.)
- Testing error scenarios
src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.spec.ts (1)
42-44: Consider adding more test cases.The current test suite only has a placeholder test case that checks if the component is created. Consider adding more test cases to cover the component's behavior and edge cases.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.css (3)
5-7: Remove commented code.The commented out code segment can be removed if it's not needed.
-.col-xs-12:first-child { - display: none !important; -}
13-43: LGTM with suggestions!The code segment is approved with a few suggestions:
Try to avoid using !important flag if possible, as it makes the styles harder to override.
The deep selectors for bs-datepicker make the styles tightly coupled to that component. Consider moving those styles to the bs-datepicker component itself to make them more reusable.
45-60: Consider moving styles to the bs-datepicker component.The deep selectors for bs-datepicker make the styles tightly coupled to that component. Consider moving those styles to the bs-datepicker component itself to make them more reusable.
src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.spec.ts (1)
26-45: Add more test cases.The test suite only contains a single test case that checks if the component is created. Please add more test cases to thoroughly test the component behavior, such as:
- Test cases for the component's input properties and output events.
- Test cases for the component's template bindings and user interactions.
- Test cases for the component's dependency interactions, if any.
Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-succespopup.html (1)
20-46: Move the inline CSS styles to a separate CSS file.The "Yes" and "No" buttons are styled using inline CSS, which is not a best practice. Inline styles are difficult to maintain and reuse.
Consider moving the styles to a separate CSS file and using CSS classes to style the buttons.
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.css (1)
46-63: Remove commented out styles.The styles on lines 46-63 are commented out and should be removed if they are no longer needed.
Apply this diff to remove the commented out styles:
- /* .mat_blue { - background-color: #0277bd !important; - border-color: unset !important; - color: white; - border: unset; - border-radius: 20px; - line-height: 36px; - min-width: 88px; - } - .mat_blue:disabled { - background-color: #e0e0e0 !important; - border-color: unset !important; - color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.38); - border: unset; - border-radius: 3px; - line-height: 36px; - min-width: 88px; - } */src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.css (3)
1-4: Consider using padding on the container instead of negative margin.The negative
margin-lefton themd2-paginationcomponent might cause it to overflow outside its container.It's better to add equivalent
padding-lefton the container element.
6-8: Addoverflowandtext-overflowproperties to handle potential text overflow.The
white-space: nowrapprevents the text inside elements withcolumnclass from wrapping. This might cause text overflow issues if the column width is not sufficient.Consider adding the following properties to handle text overflow gracefully:
.column { white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; }
120-122: Avoid using!importantand use more specific selectors instead.The
!importantrule is used to override any other styles. While it works, it's generally considered a bad practice and should be avoided when possible.Try to use more specific selectors to achieve the desired styling without relying on
!important. For example:.mat-mdc-dialog-container .mdc-dialog__surface { overflow: visible; }src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.ts (1)
1-196: LGTM!The code changes in the
AbhaInformationComponentare approved. The component is well-structured and follows Angular's best practices for reactive forms and component interaction.Consider adding more comments to explain the purpose and functionality of each method in the component. This will improve the code's readability and maintainability for other developers.
src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.ts (1)
36-57: Component properties look good with a minor suggestion!
- The property names are descriptive and follow the Angular style guide.
- Type annotations are provided for most of the properties, which is a good practice.
Consider specifying more specific types for properties that have the "any" type, if possible. This can help catch type-related issues at compile time and improve code readability.
src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.ts (1)
187-219: Consider a minor refactoring to avoid code duplication in theverifyMobileOtpmethod.The
verifyMobileOtpmethod is correctly implemented but can be slightly refactored to avoid code duplication.Here's a suggestion:
- Extract the common logic for creating the request object and calling the
verifyMobileOTPForAadharmethod into a separate method.- Call the extracted method with the appropriate parameters based on the condition.
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.ts (3)
60-86:captureDatamethod is properly implemented.The method correctly handles the AVDM capture process using the
RdDeviceService. It sets thecapturePIDproperty and calls thegenerateAbhamethod when necessary.Consider providing more specific error messages in the error handling block to help with debugging and troubleshooting.
125-191:posthealthIDButtonCallmethod is properly implemented.The method correctly generates a health ID with UID by creating the request object and calling the
generateHealthIdWithUIDmethod of theRegistrarService. The response handling and success dialog opening are implemented correctly, and the health ID and ABHA details are set in theRegistrarService.Consider providing more specific error messages in the error handling block to help with debugging and troubleshooting.
193-231:downloadABHAForBiomethod is properly implemented.The method correctly downloads the ABHA card for biometric authentication by subscribing to the
pidDetailDetails$observable, creating the request object, and calling theconfirmAadharmethod of theRegistrarService. The response handling and dialog opening are implemented correctly.Consider providing more specific error messages in the error handling block to help with debugging and troubleshooting.
src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.ts (2)
49-60: Fix typo in interface name.There is a typo in the interface name. It should be
Beneficiaryinstead ofBeneficary.Apply this diff to fix the typo:
-interface Beneficary { +interface Beneficiary { firstName: string; lastName: string; fatherName: string; dob: string; gender: string; genderName: string; govtIDtype: string; govtIDvalue: string; stateID: string; districtID: string; }
62-289: Remove unused methods and commented out code.The
SearchDialogComponentclass looks good overall. However, there are a few unused methods and commented out code that can be removed to improve code quality and maintainability.Consider removing the following unused methods and commented out code:
onIDCardSelected()method at line 210 is empty and unused.getStates()method at line range 249-251 is commented out and unused.getDistricts()method at line range 254-258 is unused.Removing these unused methods and commented out code will make the code cleaner and more maintainable.
src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.ts (1)
101-121: Consider splitting the method and removing console logs.The
ngOnInitmethod is performing multiple responsibilities, which can make the code harder to read and maintain. Consider splitting the method into smaller, focused methods to improve readability and maintainability.Also, consider removing the console log statement that logs the form value or wrap it in a conditional statement to only log in development mode.
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.ts (1)
339-384: Use more descriptive variable names and add comments.The
verifyOTPOnSubmitfunction uses variable names likereqObjandreswhich don't convey much meaning.Consider doing the following:
- Use more descriptive variable names like
verifyOTPRequestandverifyOTPResponse.- Add comments explaining the purpose of each code block and the expected API responses.
Using descriptive names and comments will make the code more readable and easier to understand for other developers.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (1)
158-177: Remove the unnecessarybreakstatement.The
breakstatement after the default case in the switch block is unnecessary and can be removed.Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary
breakstatement:default: regex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9 ]*$/; - break; // Add break statement here }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/assets/images/default-avatar.gifis excluded by!**/*.gif
Files selected for processing (80)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-abha-component/auth-method.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-succespopup.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration-routing.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/registration.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/registration.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/registration.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.ts (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search/search.component.css (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/search/search.component.html (1 hunks)
Files not processed due to max files limit (16)
- src/registrar/search/search.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/search/search.component.ts
- src/registrar/services/familytagging.service.ts
- src/registrar/services/rddevice.service.ts
- src/registrar/services/registrar.service.ts
- src/registrar/services/registration.service.spec.ts
- src/registrar/services/registration.service.ts
- src/registrar/set-password-for-abha/set-password-for-abha.component.css
- src/registrar/set-password-for-abha/set-password-for-abha.component.html
- src/registrar/set-password-for-abha/set-password-for-abha.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/set-password-for-abha/set-password-for-abha.component.ts
- src/registrar/utility/registration-utility.ts
- src/registrar/view-health-id-card/view-health-id-card.component.css
- src/registrar/view-health-id-card/view-health-id-card.component.html
- src/registrar/view-health-id-card/view-health-id-card.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/view-health-id-card/view-health-id-card.component.ts
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (18)
- src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.css
- src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.css
- src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.css
- src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.html
- src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.css
- src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.css
- src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.css
- src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.css
- src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.css
- src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.css
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.css
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.css
- src/registrar/registration/registration.component.spec.ts
- src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.css
- src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.css
Additional context used
Biome
src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.spec.ts
[error] 15-19: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.spec.ts
[error] 15-19: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.ts
[error] 31-32: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.spec.ts
[error] 37-41: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.spec.ts
[error] 37-41: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.spec.ts
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.css
[error] 54-54: Expected a compound selector but instead found '/'.
Expected a compound selector here.
(parse)
[error] 54-54: expected
,but instead founddeepRemove deep
(parse)
[error] 54-54: expected
,but instead found/Remove /
(parse)
[error] 54-54: expected
,but instead found.Remove .
(parse)
src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.ts
[error] 125-125: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 161-161: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.ts
[error] 244-246: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 277-279: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 317-317: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts
[error] 228-228: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 724-724: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 727-727: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 733-733: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 737-739: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 742-744: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 747-747: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 750-751: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 798-798: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 807-807: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 430-430: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~3-~3: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... process across multiple AMRIT modules, registration page needs to be configurable based on ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: The official spelling of this programming framework is “Node.js”.
Context: ...g the MMU service: * JDK 17 * Maven * Nodejs v18.10.0 * MySQL(NODE_JS)
Additional comments not posted (270)
src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.spec.ts (2)
1-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Tools
Biome
[error] 15-19: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
15-19: Skip the static analysis hint.The duplicate
beforeEachblocks are not causing any issues in this case, as they serve different purposes. The first block configures the testing module, and the second block creates an instance of the component. This is a common pattern in Angular testing.Tools
Biome
[error] 15-19: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.spec.ts (1)
15-19: Ignore the static analysis hint about duplicate setup and teardown hooks.The static analysis hint about disallowing duplicate setup and teardown hooks seems to be a false positive. There is only one
beforeEachfunction defined in the test suite, which is a valid and common practice in Angular component tests.Tools
Biome
[error] 15-19: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.html (2)
1-9: LGTM!The code segment for the title section with the close button looks good and follows Angular best practices.
10-26: LGTM, but verify thecaptureData()method implementation.The code segment for the instructions and capture button looks good and follows Angular best practices.
However, ensure that the
captureData()method is properly implemented in the component class to handle the fingerprint capture functionality.src/registrar/generate-abha-component/auth-method.html (1)
34-34: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
README.md (1)
5-7: LGTM!The features section provides a clear and comprehensive list of the key functionalities of the registration page. The content is well-structured and easy to understand.
src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.ts (2)
1-21: LGTM!The license header is correctly formatted and contains all the necessary information.
23-24: LGTM!The imports are correctly formatted and contain the necessary dependencies.
src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.html (2)
12-27: LGTM!The code segment is structurally correct and follows good practices like having the content in both Hindi and English for accessibility and using a
textFormatclass for styling the paragraphs.
36-36: LGTM!The code segment is structurally correct.
src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.html (3)
1-11: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
13-22: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
33-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/registration-routing.module.ts (3)
1-8: LGTM!The import statements are correctly defined and follow the Angular module structure. The imported entities are used in the routes defined later in the file.
9-42: LGTM!The routes are correctly defined and follow the Angular routing conventions. The
canDeactivateguard is correctly used to prevent accidental navigation from the registration page. The route parameters are correctly defined for the search and family tagging routes.
44-48: LGTM!The
RegistrationRoutingModuleis correctly defined and follows the Angular module conventions. TheRouterModuleis correctly imported and exported with the defined routes.src/registrar/dashboard/dashboard.component.spec.ts (1)
27-46: Test suite structure looks good!The test suite for
DashboardComponentis well-structured with setup code and a test case.The static analysis error about duplicate setup hooks is a false positive and can be ignored. The two
beforeEachhooks are performing different setup tasks - one for the testing module configuration and another for the component creation.As a future enhancement, consider adding more test cases to verify the component behavior and interactions.
Tools
Biome
[error] 37-41: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.spec.ts (3)
1-21: LGTM!The license header is correctly added.
23-25: LGTM!The imports are correctly added.
27-35: LGTM!The test suite is correctly set up with the required configuration.
src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.spec.ts (1)
36-40: Ignore the static analysis hint about duplicate setup hooks.The setup code using
beforeEachat line range 36-40 is not duplicated. The static analysis hint seems to be a false positive.Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.spec.ts (1)
26-45: LGTM!The test suite setup is correctly using
TestBedto configure the testing module and create the component.The static analysis hint about duplicate setup hooks is a false positive. The two
beforeEachblocks serve different purposes - one to configure the testing module and the other to create the component.Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.spec.ts (3)
1-21: License header looks good!The license header is correctly formatted and specifies the GNU General Public License version 3 or later, which is an appropriate open-source license for the project.
22-24: Imports look good!The file imports the necessary testing utilities from
@angular/core/testingand theCreateFamilyTaggingComponentbeing tested.
26-40: Test suite setup looks good!The test suite setup follows the standard pattern for Angular component tests:
- It declares the component and fixture variables.
- The
beforeEachblock configures the testing module with the necessary declarations and creates the component.Note: The static analysis warning about duplicate setup hooks is a false positive, as there is only one
beforeEachblock.Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.spec.ts (2)
1-21: LGTM!The license header is correctly added.
26-45: LGTM!The test suite is correctly defined with setup code and a placeholder test case.
Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.spec.ts (2)
26-45: Test suite structure looks good!The test suite has a standard structure with setup and a placeholder test case. The code changes are approved.
Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
36-40: Ignore the static analysis error.The static analysis error for duplicate setup hooks is a false positive. There is only one
beforeEachblock in the test suite. This error can be ignored.Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.spec.ts (5)
1-21: LGTM!The copyright header is correctly added.
22-24: LGTM!The necessary dependencies for testing are correctly imported.
26-29: LGTM!The
describeblock for the component is correctly defined.
30-34: LGTM!The
beforeEachblock to configure the testing module is correctly defined.
42-44: LGTM!The test case is correctly defined.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.css (3)
1-3: LGTM!The code segment is approved.
9-11: LGTM!The code segment is approved.
62-73: LGTM!The code segment is approved.
src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.spec.ts (1)
36-40: Ignore the duplicate setup hook hint from static analysis.The static analysis hint about disallowing duplicate setup hooks appears to be a false positive. There is only one
beforeEachblock in this test suite, so there is no duplication.Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.html (4)
1-10: LGTM!The title section is correctly implemented.
12-30: LGTM!The form section with the radio group for selecting the mode of ABHA generation is correctly implemented.
31-46: LGTM, but verify the custom directive.The Aadhar number input field is correctly implemented.
However, the purpose of the
myMobileNumberdirective used on the input field is unclear from the provided context. Please ensure that this directive is intended to be used here and that it serves the correct purpose.
48-60: LGTM!The "Generate" button is correctly implemented with the appropriate bindings and styles.
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-succespopup.html (3)
1-48: LGTM! The section correctly displays the success messages and user actions.The section is well-structured and uses Angular's template syntax correctly for conditional rendering and data binding. The success messages and user actions are displayed as expected.
49-75: LGTM! The section correctly displays the success messages and user actions.The section is well-structured and uses Angular's template syntax correctly for conditional rendering and data binding. The success messages and user actions are displayed as expected.
43-43: Verify the implementation and usage of thefetchOtpfunction.The
fetchOtpfunction is triggered when the "Yes" button is clicked, but the implementation of this function is not provided in the HTML file.Ensure that the
fetchOtpfunction is correctly implemented in the corresponding TypeScript file and that it handles the ABHA and ABHA number arguments correctly.Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
The
fetchOtpfunction is correctly implemented and used.The
fetchOtpfunction is defined insrc/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.tsand handles the two arguments as expected. The function's implementation involves UI operations, which align with its usage in the HTML file.
- Location of implementation:
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and usage of the `fetchOtp` function. # Test: Search for the function definition. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'fetchOtp($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences with two arguments. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'fetchOtp'Length of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected script to verify the implementation and usage of the `fetchOtp` function. # Test: Search for the function definition with two parameters. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern 'function fetchOtp($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences with two arguments. rg --type ts -A 5 'fetchOtp'Length of output: 764
src/registrar/registration/consent-form/consent-form.component.ts (1)
34-63: LGTM!The
ConsentFormComponentclass looks good:
- The constructor is correctly injecting the required dependencies.
- The
ngOnInitmethod is correctly calling theassignSelectedLanguagemethod.- The
assignSelectedLanguagemethod is using theSetLanguageComponentto set the language and assign the current language object.- The
closeConsentmethod is navigating to the search page and closing the dialog with thegrantvalue.- The
acceptConsentmethod is navigating to the registration page and closing the dialog with thegrantvalue.The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.css (1)
1-128: LGTM!The CSS styles are well-organized, follow a consistent naming convention, use appropriate units for sizing and spacing, and are responsive. The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.css (15)
10-14: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
18-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
22-28: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
29-35: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
37-40: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
42-49: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
51-58: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
60-62: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
64-66: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
68-72: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
74-77: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
78-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
94-96: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
98-108: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
110-119: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.html (4)
1-10: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
13-17: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
20-59: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
61-99: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.css (20)
1-3: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
5-9: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
11-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
21-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
26-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
32-36: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
38-40: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
41-56: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
57-59: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
60-64: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
66-76: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
78-81: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
83-93: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
95-105: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
107-115: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
117-120: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
122-126: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
128-141: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
143-148: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
150-155: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.html (6)
1-4: LGTM!The template structure and form setup using Angular's reactive forms look good. Dynamically rendering form fields based on the
formDataarray allows for flexibility.
6-16: LGTM!The text input field rendering using
<mat-form-field>and<input matInput>looks good. The form control binding and validations for required, min length, and max length are correctly implemented.
18-23: LGTM!The date input field rendering using
<mat-form-field>and<input matInput [matDatepicker]>looks good. The form control binding and required validation are correctly implemented.
25-32: LGTM!The multiple select field rendering using
<mat-form-field>and<mat-select multiple>looks good. The form control binding, required validation, and option rendering using<mat-option>with*ngForare correctly implemented.
34-42: LGTM!The radio button group rendering using
<mat-radio-group>and<mat-radio-button>looks good. The form control binding, required validation, option rendering using<mat-radio-button>with*ngFor, and conditional label rendering are correctly implemented.
44-51: LGTM!The dropdown field rendering using
<mat-form-field>and<mat-select>looks good. The form control binding, required validation, and option rendering using<mat-option>with*ngForare correctly implemented.src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.ts (3)
1-18: LGTM!The imports and component metadata are properly defined.
39-62: LGTM!The
ngOnInitmethod is properly implemented and follows Angular best practices.
85-117: LGTM!The remaining methods and lifecycle hooks are properly implemented and follow Angular best practices.
src/registrar/search/search.component.css (21)
1-3: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the table width to 100%.
5-7: LGTM!The code segment is correctly right aligning the text in the
md2-paginationelement.
11-13: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the height of the element with class
spacerto 10px.
15-18: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the minimum height of
mat-cardto 403px and padding to 15px.
20-22: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the margin of the element with class
paginationto 0.
24-26: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the width of
md-input-containerelements within an element with idtopRowto 60%.
28-31: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the width of the element with id
quickSearchto 40% and floating it to the right.
33-37: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the margin of elements with class
adv-buttonto 0 10px, width to 26%, and border-color to unset.
39-41: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the left margin of button elements within an element with class
buttonGrpto 5px.
43-54: LGTM!The code segment is correctly styling the element with class
searchBoxby setting the background color, minimum height, overflow, border radius, border width, margin, box shadow, and width properties.
56-58: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the font weight of elements with class
search_iconto bold.
60-70: LGTM!The code segment is correctly styling the elements with class
search_buttonby setting the padding, width, minimum height, background, border, transform, transition, outline, and color properties.
72-75: LGTM!The code segment is correctly removing the outline and border of elements with class
search_buttonwhen they are active.
77-82: LGTM!The code segment is correctly styling the elements with class
search_textboxby setting the width, height, border, and padding-left properties.
84-86: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the bottom margin of the element with id
search_typeto -1px.
88-93: LGTM!The code segment is correctly styling the elements with class
search_buttonwhen they are hovered by setting the transform and transition properties and removing the outline and border.
95-112: LGTM!The code segment is correctly adjusting the styles for screens with a maximum width of 481px by:
- Setting the margin and width of elements with classes
adv-button,mat-button,mat-icon-button, andmat-raised-button.- Setting the width of
md-input-containerelements within an element with idtopRowto 100%.- Setting the width of the element with id
quickSearchto 100%.
114-116: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the top margin of elements with class
totalCountto 10px.
118-121: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the color of placeholder text in input elements to gray with an opacity of 1 using the WebKit vendor prefix.
123-127: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the color of placeholder text in input elements to gray with an opacity of 1 using the standard
::placeholderpseudo-element.
129-133: LGTM!The code segment is correctly setting the color of placeholder text in input elements to gray with an opacity of 1 using the Microsoft vendor prefix for Internet Explorer 10-11.
src/registrar/health-id-otp-generation/health-id-otp-generation.component.html (2)
1-89: LGTM!The code changes for entering mobile number for OTP generation are approved.
91-141: LGTM!The code changes for entering OTP for health ID generation are approved.
src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.html (3)
2-65: LGTM! The dynamic form generation and field rendering looks good.The form is correctly bound to the
otherInfoFormGroupand the form fields are dynamically generated based on theformDataarray. The supported field types are rendered correctly.The template is clean and readable.
8-15: LGTM! The form validation looks good.The form validation is implemented correctly using Angular's reactive forms. The required, min length, and max length validations are applied based on the properties of each
formDataitem.The validation error messages are displayed correctly using
<mat-error>elements.
1-67: LGTM! The form is accessible and user-friendly.The form fields are properly labeled using
<mat-label>elements and theplaceholderattribute is used to provide additional hints to the user.The
readonlyattribute is correctly used on the date field to prevent direct input and enforce selection through the date picker.Overall, the form is accessible and provides a good user experience.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.html (5)
3-33: LGTM!The image capture section is implemented correctly.
38-51: LGTM!The text input fields are implemented correctly with proper bindings and validations.
53-58: LGTM!The date input fields are implemented correctly with proper bindings and date picker functionality.
60-67: LGTM!The multiple select fields are implemented correctly with proper bindings and dynamic options.
69-77: LGTM!The radio button fields are implemented correctly with proper bindings and dynamic options.
src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.html (3)
4-4: Great job usingcurrentLanguageSetfor localization!The usage of
currentLanguageSetobject to display localized text for labels, placeholders, and error messages is a good practice. The safe navigation operator?.is used correctly to avoid errors whencurrentLanguageSetor its properties are undefined. The localized text is also separated into logical groups likecommonfor reusability.Also applies to: 36-36, 39-39, 106-106, 109-109
7-12: Excellent usage of Angular Material components!The template uses various Angular Material components like
mat-icon,mat-form-field,mat-label,mat-select,mat-option,mat-error, andmat-dialog-actionsto create a consistent and visually appealing UI. The usage of these components is a good practice as they provide a set of reusable and accessible UI components that follow Material Design guidelines. The components are used correctly with proper bindings and event handlers.Also applies to: 20-41, 45-61, 67-86, 90-111, 117-133
17-17: Great usage of template-driven forms!The template uses template-driven forms approach with
ngModelfor two-way data binding. The form fields are bound correctly to component properties using[(ngModel)]. The form validation is done correctly usingrequiredattribute andminlengthandmaxlengthvalidators. The submit button is also disabled correctly when the form is invalid using[disabled]="newFamilyTaggingForm.invalid". Overall, the usage of template-driven forms is a good practice for simple forms with basic validation requirements.Also applies to: 24-34, 49-60, 72-85, 94-110, 125-132
src/registrar/registration.module.ts (4)
1-106: LGTM!The registration module is well-structured and organized. It follows the Angular best practices and conventions.
The module encapsulates the registration feature and its related components and services. It imports the necessary dependencies and exports the required components.
The code changes are approved.
41-66: LGTM!The component declarations in the registration module are complete and correct. All the necessary components related to the registration feature are declared and exported.
The code changes are approved.
67-78: LGTM!The module imports in the registration module are complete and correct. The module imports all the necessary Angular modules and custom modules required for the functionality of the registration feature.
There are no unused or unnecessary module imports.
The code changes are approved.
99-104: LGTM!The service providers in the registration module are complete and correct. The module provides all the necessary services required by the components in the registration module.
There are no unused or unnecessary service providers.
The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.html (2)
23-143: LGTM!The form fields and their bindings are implemented correctly:
- The form fields are bound to the
familySearchFormFormGroup using theformGroupdirective.- The form fields are bound to the corresponding FormControl using the
formControlNamedirective.- The form fields are populated with data from the component class using the
*ngFordirective.- The form fields have appropriate validation attributes such as
required,minlength, andmaxlength.- The form fields have appropriate error messages for validation errors.
145-154: LGTM!The form submission is implemented correctly:
- The form submission is triggered by the search button click event.
- The search button is disabled until the form is valid using the
[disabled]directive.- The search button click event is bound to the
getFamilySearchMaster()method in the component class.src/registrar/generate-abha-component/generate-abha-component.component.ts (1)
130-166: LGTM!The component follows Angular's best practices and has no major issues.
src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.html (2)
1-65: LGTM!The OTP validation section is implemented correctly using Angular's reactive forms and validation attributes. The form submission is handled based on certain conditions. The code follows Angular best practices and there are no apparent issues.
67-153: LGTM!The ABHA card search section is implemented correctly using Angular's reactive forms and validation attributes. The search functionality is handled based on certain conditions. The code follows Angular best practices and there are no apparent issues.
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.html (4)
5-14: LGTM!The "Family Tagging" button code looks good. It is displayed conditionally based on the
patientRevisitandserviceLinevariables, and has the correct click event to navigate to the family tagging page.
17-19: LGTM!The form and stepper structure looks good:
- Using Angular's reactive forms with
formGroupbinding is a good practice.- Dividing the form into multiple steps using
mat-horizontal-stepperenhances maintainability and user experience.- Conditionally displaying steps based on
enableXXXInfovariables provides flexibility.
28-29: LGTM!Using child components for each step of the form is a good approach:
- It promotes component reusability and maintainability.
- It keeps the parent component clean and focused.
- Passing necessary inputs (form group, form data, flags, etc.) to the child components ensures they have the required data and context.
Also applies to: 51-52, 76-77, 102-102
34-38: LGTM!The form submission and navigation buttons are implemented correctly:
- Conditional display of "Next" and "Back" buttons based on the current step and
enableXXXInfovariables provides a clear navigation flow.- Having separate "Submit" and "Update" buttons for new registration and patient revisit, respectively, is a good practice.
- Disabling the "Submit" and "Update" buttons when the form is invalid (
[disabled]="!mainForm.valid") prevents submitting incomplete or incorrect data.Also applies to: 57-60, 82-85, 107-110
src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.html (2)
1-100: LGTM!The code segment is well-structured and follows Angular template syntax. It effectively uses
*ngIfto conditionally render the beneficiary details based onbenFlowStatus. The table structure provides a clear presentation of the beneficiary details.
101-202: LGTM!The code segment is well-structured and follows a similar pattern to the previous one. It effectively handles the case when
benFlowStatusis false and displays additional details. The use of thetitlecasepipe and the handling of null/undefined values for the family ID are good practices.src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.html (1)
1-196: LGTM!The search dialog component template looks good:
- It follows a structured layout using rows and columns for organizing the form fields.
- It leverages Angular Material components for a consistent and visually appealing UI.
- The use of reactive forms enables form validation and easier form submission handling.
- Internationalization is implemented for language localization.
- The code is readable and follows Angular best practices.
- The form submission is disabled until the form is valid, ensuring data integrity.
The component appears to be a standalone dialog for searching beneficiaries based on the provided criteria.
The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/family-tagging/create-family-tagging/create-family-tagging.component.ts (12)
1-21: License header looks good!The GNU GPL license header is complete and follows the standard format.
30-35: Component metadata and class declaration look good!
- The component metadata is defined correctly with the selector, template, and styles.
- The component class is declared properly and implements the necessary lifecycle hooks.
59-66: Component constructor looks good!
- The constructor parameters are properly typed and follow the Angular dependency injection pattern.
- The injected dependencies are valid and commonly used in Angular components.
68-78: ngOnInit method looks good!
- Initializing component properties and performing necessary setup in ngOnInit follows the Angular component lifecycle.
- Calling the CreatenewFamilyTaggingForm method to set up the form is a valid approach.
- Invoking the getSurname and getRelationShipMaster methods to fetch data is appropriate in ngOnInit.
80-82: ngDoCheck method looks good!
- Implementing the ngDoCheck lifecycle hook is a valid approach for detecting changes in the component.
- Calling the assignSelectedLanguage method in ngDoCheck ensures that the language is updated whenever there are changes.
84-88: assignSelectedLanguage method looks good!
- The method is responsible for setting the selected language for the component.
- Creating an instance of SetLanguageComponent and calling its setLanguage method is a valid approach for language setup.
- Assigning the currentLanguageObject to the component's currentLanguageSet property ensures that the current language is accessible in the component.
90-97: CreatenewFamilyTaggingForm method looks good!
- The method is responsible for creating the form group for the family tagging form.
- Using the FormBuilder to create the form group is a common and recommended approach in Angular.
- The form group contains the necessary form controls for family tagging.
99-102: ResetForm method looks good!
- The method is responsible for resetting the family tagging form.
- Calling the reset method on the form is a valid approach to clear the form controls.
- Setting the enableOther property to false ensures that the "other" field is disabled when the form is reset.
104-106: getSurname method looks good!
- The method is responsible for retrieving the surname for the family tagging form.
- Assigning the value of benFamilyName to the familyName property is a straightforward way to set the surname.
108-148: createNewFamilyTagging method looks good!
- The method is responsible for creating a new family tagging by sending a request to the server.
- Constructing the request object with the necessary data is a valid approach.
- Using the familyTaggingService to send the request follows the Angular service pattern.
- Handling the response and displaying messages using the confirmationService is a good practice for user feedback.
150-163: getRelationShipMaster method looks good!
- The method is responsible for retrieving the relationship master data from the server.
- Using the familyTaggingService to make the API call follows the Angular service pattern.
- Handling the response and assigning the data to the relationShipType property is a valid approach.
- Displaying an error message using the confirmationService is a good practice for user feedback.
165-187: populateRelation method looks good!
- The method is responsible for populating the relationship options based on the isHead value.
- The logic for filtering the relationShipType based on the isHead value is implemented correctly.
- Assigning the filtered items to the relationShipList and relationWithHeadOfFamily is a valid approach.
- The method clears the relationShipList, enableOther, and otherRelation properties before populating the relationships.
src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.html (1)
1-215: LGTM!The HTML template for the
EditFamilyTaggingComponentis well-structured and follows Angular best practices. It uses appropriate Angular Material components for the form and table. The form has proper validation and disabling of the save button. The code is readable and maintainable.src/registrar/generate-mobile-otp-generation/generate-mobile-otp-generation.component.ts (7)
1-21: License header looks good.The GNU General Public License version 3 license header is correctly formatted and contains the necessary information.
60-65:ngOnInitmethod looks good.The
ngOnInitmethod correctly initializes the component by:
- Assigning the selected language.
- Initializing the
txnIdandbioValproperties from the injected data.- Initializing the
generateMobileOTPFormproperty by calling thecreatemobileOTPValidationFormmethod.
67-69:ngDoCheckmethod looks good.The
ngDoCheckmethod correctly calls theassignSelectedLanguagemethod.
70-74:assignSelectedLanguagemethod looks good.The
assignSelectedLanguagemethod correctly assigns the selected language by:
- Creating an instance of
SetLanguageComponentand calling itssetLanguagemethod.- Assigning the
currentLanguageObjectproperty ofSetLanguageComponentto thecurrentLanguageSetproperty of the component.
76-81:createmobileOTPValidationFormmethod looks good.The
createmobileOTPValidationFormmethod correctly creates a form group for mobile OTP validation using theFormBuilderservice withmobileNoandmobileOtpform controls.
83-85:closeDialogmethod looks good.The
closeDialogmethod correctly closes the dialog by calling theclosemethod of theMatDialogRefservice.
161-184:resendOTPmethod looks good.The
resendOTPmethod correctly resends the OTP by:
- Setting the
showProgressBarproperty to true.- Creating a request object with the mobile number and transaction ID.
- Calling the
checkAndGenerateMobileOTPHealthIdmethod of theRegistrarServicewith the request object.- Setting the
showProgressBarproperty to false if the response status code is 200 and the response data is truthy.- Showing an error message using the
ConfirmationServiceif the response status code is not 200.src/registrar/beneficiary-details/beneficiary-details.component.ts (9)
1-21: Copyright header looks good.The copyright header follows the standard format and specifies the correct license.
42-103: Lifecycle hooks usage looks good.The component correctly implements and uses the OnInit, DoCheck, and OnDestroy lifecycle hooks.
61-68: Service dependencies look good.The component is injecting the necessary services through the constructor to retrieve and manage data.
105-130: Beneficiary details retrieval looks good.The component is using the BeneficiaryDetailsService to retrieve the beneficiary details and image. The usage of observables and subscriptions is correct.
Tools
Biome
[error] 125-125: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
132-165: Family details retrieval looks good.The component is using the RegistrarService to retrieve the beneficiary family details and the BeneficiaryDetailsService to retrieve the beneficiary image. The usage of observables and subscriptions is correct.
Tools
Biome
[error] 161-161: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
167-231: Health ID details retrieval looks good.The component is using the RegistrarService to retrieve the beneficiary health ID details. The processing of the retrieved data and error handling using the ConfirmationService is implemented correctly.
92-96: Language assignment looks good.The component is using the SetLanguageComponent to set the language and assign the current language object correctly.
98-103: Subscription management looks good.The component is unsubscribing from the subscriptions in the ngOnDestroy hook to prevent memory leaks.
125-125: Skipping static analysis hints.The suggestions to change to optional chaining are not applicable here. The code is already handling the case when data is undefined using an if condition.
Also applies to: 161-161
Tools
Biome
[error] 125-125: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/registrar/biometric-authentication/biometric-authentication.component.ts (7)
1-15: Imports look good.The imported components, services, and operators seem relevant to the component's functionality. No unused imports detected.
17-21: Component metadata is properly defined.The selector, template, and styles are correctly specified in the
@Componentdecorator.
22-42: Component class and constructor look good.The component class is properly defined with relevant properties. The constructor injects the necessary dependencies for the component's functionality.
44-49:ngOnInitmethod is properly implemented.The
ngOnInitmethod correctly initializes theaadharBioNumandhealthDataNumproperties from thedataobject passed to the component.
51-58:ngDoCheckandassignSelectedLanguagemethods look good.The
ngDoCheckmethod correctly calls theassignSelectedLanguagemethod to set the current language using theSetLanguageComponentservice.
107-123:generateMobileOTPForBiomethod is properly implemented.The method correctly generates a mobile OTP for biometric authentication by opening a dialog using the
GenerateMobileOtpGenerationComponentand passing the necessary data. The dialog close event is handled appropriately, and theposthealthIDButtonCallmethod is called with the response.
233-235:closeDialogmethod is properly implemented.The method correctly closes the dialog using the
closemethod of theMatDialogRef.src/registrar/search-dialog/search-dialog.component.ts (2)
1-21: License header looks good.The license header contains the necessary information about the AMRIT project, copyright, and license terms.
23-47: Imports look good.The imports are correctly formatted and organized. The custom module imports use relative paths.
src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.html (1)
1-250: LGTM!The Angular template code looks good overall:
- The structure and usage of Angular Material components like mat-sidenav, mat-table, and mat-paginator are correct.
- The template bindings to component properties and event handlers are used correctly.
- The usage of structural directives like
*ngIfand*ngForis correct.- Accessibility attributes are used on relevant elements.
- The mat-table and mat-paginator usage looks fine.
No major issues or improvements identified. Good job!
src/registrar/search-family/search-family.component.ts (3)
1-21: LGTM!The license header is correctly formatted and contains the necessary information.
123-125: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
127-135: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/family-tagging/edit-family-tagging/edit-family-tagging.component.ts (7)
73-86: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
98-113: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
115-137: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
140-153: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
155-177: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
201-303: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Tools
Biome
[error] 244-246: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 277-279: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
305-340: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Tools
Biome
[error] 317-317: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.html (5)
1-30: LGTM!The code segment for the modal dialog header looks good. It correctly uses
*ngIfto conditionally display the title and progress bar overlay.
31-105: LGTM!The code segment for displaying the health ID details table is implemented correctly. It properly uses Angular Material table directives and bindings. The conditional rendering of the table and "No record found" message is handled appropriately.
106-194: LGTM!The code segment for displaying the health ID details table with the action column is implemented correctly. It follows the Angular Material table structure and uses appropriate directives and bindings. The print button in the action column is handled properly. The conditional rendering of the "No record found" message is also in place.
195-308: LGTM!The code segment for mapping health ID to care context is implemented correctly. It uses Angular Material table directives and bindings appropriately. The radio buttons for selecting a health ID and the conditional enabling of the "Generate OTP" button are handled properly. The "No record found" message is displayed when the data source is empty, which is a good practice.
311-361: LGTM!The code segment for the OTP form is implemented correctly. It uses Angular reactive forms with appropriate directives and validation attributes. The submit button is conditionally enabled based on form validity and OTP check, which is a good practice. The cancel button for resending the OTP is also implemented properly.
src/registrar/search/search.component.html (5)
1-34: Search box implementation looks good!The search box is correctly implemented using an input field and a button. The search term is bound to the component using
[(ngModel)]and the search is triggered on the enter key press or button click.
35-101: Buttons implementation looks good!The buttons are correctly implemented. The Fingerprint Search button is hidden, the Registration button navigates to the registration page, and the Advance Search button opens a search dialog.
104-360: Beneficiary list table implementation looks good!The beneficiary list table is correctly implemented using Angular Material's
mat-table. It has a search box to filter the list, displays various columns, has an edit button for each row, and the rows are clickable to navigate to the beneficiary details page. The table also has a paginator to paginate the results.
297-317: ABHA address column implementation looks good!The ABHA address column is correctly implemented with a button to view the health ID details. The button is implemented using Angular Material's
mat-raised-buttonand the click event triggers thegetHealthIDDetailsfunction.
319-336: Image column implementation looks good!The image column is correctly implemented to display a default avatar image. The image is clickable to view the patient's image and the click event triggers the
patientImageViewfunction.src/registrar/family-tagging/family-tagging-details/family-tagging-details.component.ts (16)
1-21: LGTM!The GNU General Public License version 3 header is correctly formatted and contains the necessary information.
41-45: LGTM!The component metadata is correctly defined.
46-48: LGTM!The component class is correctly defined and implements the necessary lifecycle hooks.
110-213: LGTM!The
ngOnInitmethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary initialization actions.
215-217: LGTM!The
ngDoCheckmethod is correctly implemented.
219-223: LGTM!The
ngOnDestroymethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary cleanup actions.
225-229: LGTM!The
assignSelectedLanguagemethod is correctly implemented.
231-258: LGTM!The
CreateFamilyDialogmethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary actions based on the dialog result.
260-268: LGTM!The
sideNavModeChangemethod is correctly implemented.
270-294: LGTM!The
openSearchFamilymethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary actions based on the dialog result.
296-314: LGTM!The
loadSearchDetailsmethod is correctly implemented and handles the service response.
316-323: LGTM!The
PatientRevistDatamethod is correctly implemented.
325-327: LGTM!The
backToRegistrationmethod is correctly implemented.
329-347: LGTM!The
getFamilyMembersmethod is correctly implemented and handles the service response.
349-370: LGTM!The
openFamilyTagDialogmethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary actions based on the dialog result.
372-400: LGTM!The
getBeneficiaryDetailsAfterFamilyTagmethod is correctly implemented and handles the service response.src/registrar/health-id-display-modal/health-id-display-modal.component.ts (18)
1-21: LGTM!The GNU General Public License header is correctly added at the beginning of the file.
46-78: LGTM!The component metadata is correctly defined with the selector, template, styles, and custom providers for date formatting.
80-118: LGTM!The component class properties are correctly defined to store the component state and data.
119-130: LGTM!The constructor is correctly defined and injects the necessary dependencies. The dialog reference is also configured to disable close.
132-179: LGTM!The
ngOnInitmethod is correctly defined and initializes the component state and data. The input data is parsed and processed as expected.
181-188: LGTM!The
ngDoCheckandassignSelectedLanguagemethods are correctly defined and work together to set the current language.
189-193: LGTM!The
createOtpGenerationFormmethod is correctly defined and creates the OTP generation form using the form builder.
194-204: LGTM!The
createListmethod is correctly defined and creates a list of health IDs from the beneficiary details. The creation date of each health ID is formatted as expected.
206-208: LGTM!The
onRadioChangemethod is correctly defined and updates the selected health ID based on the radio button change.
209-245: LGTM!The
generateOtpForMappingmethod is correctly defined and generates an OTP for mapping the care context. The API call to the registrar service is made and the response is handled appropriately.
246-252: LGTM!The
numberOnlymethod is correctly defined and validates that only numeric characters are allowed in the input.
253-269: LGTM!The
checkOTPmethod is correctly defined and validates the OTP entered by the user. The length and characters of the OTP are checked as expected.
270-275: LGTM!The
isLetterandis_numericmethods are correctly defined and perform their respective validations.
277-319: LGTM!The
verifyOtpmethod is correctly defined and verifies the OTP entered by the user. The API call to the registrar service is made and the response is handled appropriately.
320-324: LGTM!The
resendOtpmethod is correctly defined and resets the OTP form and generates a new OTP as expected.
325-327: LGTM!The
closeDialogmethod is correctly defined and closes the dialog as expected.
329-345: LGTM!The
openDialogForprintHealthIDCardmethod is correctly defined and opens a dialog to print the health ID card. The necessary data is passed to the dialog as expected.
347-418: LGTM!The
printHealthIDCardmethod is correctly defined and generates and prints the health ID card. The API call to the registrar service is made and the response is handled appropriately. The dialog to print the health ID card is opened as expected.src/registrar/health-id-validatepopup/health-id-validatepopup.component.ts (19)
51-74: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
76-88: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
90-92: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
93-97: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
98-104: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
105-109: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
110-115: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
116-118: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
120-136: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
138-252: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
254-256: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
257-259: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
260-354: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
356-379: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
380-387: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
388-400: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
401-470: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
471-516: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
517-533: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (9)
29-58: Component metadata looks good.The component selector, template, styles, and providers are properly defined.
60-82: Input properties and local variables are properly defined.The input properties are decorated with
@Input()to receive data from the parent component. The local variables are used to store data used within the component.
83-108: Constructor is properly defined.The constructor injects the required services and subscribes to the
registrationABHADetails$observable to update the form values based on the received response.
110-144:ngOnInitmethod is properly implemented.The method sets up the form controls based on the
formDataarray, handles the revisit mode by patching the form values, and calls thesetupFormValueChangesmethod to set up form value change subscriptions.
152-156:setDateLimitsmethod is properly implemented.The method sets the
todayandminDateproperties based on the current date and theageLimitto define the date limits for the calendar and age validation.
179-187:onInputChangedmethod is properly implemented.The method handles the input value change and restricts the input value length based on the provided
maxLength.
189-200:captureImagemethod is properly implemented.The method captures the beneficiary image using the
cameraServiceand updates the form values accordingly.
206-218:loadMasterDataObservablemethod is properly implemented.The method loads the master data observable, assigns the response to the
masterDataproperty, and calls theloadPersonalDataForEditingmethod if the component is in revisit mode.
225-235:loadPersonalDataForEditingmethod is properly implemented.The method loads the personal data for editing, assigns the response to the
revisitDataproperty, validates the marital status master, pushes the editing data to the form, and gets the beneficiary image.Tools
Biome
[error] 228-228: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts (3)
1-13: Import statements look good!The import statements are properly organized and follow a consistent pattern. No unused imports were reported by the static analysis tools.
42-63: Constructor implementation looks good!The constructor properly injects the required dependencies and initializes the
mainFormusing theFormBuilder. The use ofFormBuilderis a good practice for creating reactive forms.
72-111: Validator methods implementation looks good!The
minValidator,maxValidator, andallowTextValidatormethods are implemented correctly and provide useful validation functionality for form controls. They follow the expected signature for custom validators in Angular reactive forms.
| @Component({ | ||
| selector: 'app-dashboard', | ||
| templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html', | ||
| styleUrls: ['./dashboard.component.css'], | ||
| }) | ||
| export class DashboardComponent { | ||
| constructor() {} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the unnecessary constructor.
The component class has an empty constructor, which is unnecessary and can be removed.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary constructor:
export class DashboardComponent {
- constructor() {}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @Component({ | |
| selector: 'app-dashboard', | |
| templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html', | |
| styleUrls: ['./dashboard.component.css'], | |
| }) | |
| export class DashboardComponent { | |
| constructor() {} | |
| } | |
| @Component({ | |
| selector: 'app-dashboard', | |
| templateUrl: './dashboard.component.html', | |
| styleUrls: ['./dashboard.component.css'], | |
| }) | |
| export class DashboardComponent { | |
| } |
Tools
Biome
[error] 31-32: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
| <button | ||
| id="moveToPrintHealthIDCard" | ||
| style="margin: 5px" | ||
| mat-raised-button | ||
| color="primary" | ||
| class="full-width-login pull-right m-r-5 mat_blue" | ||
| (click)="generateAbhaCard()" | ||
| > | ||
| Generate ABHA Card | ||
| </button> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the duplicate id.
The button has the same id as the second button, which could lead to unexpected behavior.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-<button
-id="moveToPrintHealthIDCard"
+<button
+id="moveToGenerateHealthIDCard"
style="margin: 5px"
mat-raised-button
color="primary"
class="full-width-login pull-right m-r-5 mat_blue"
(click)="generateAbhaCard()"
>
Generate ABHA Card
</button>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <button | |
| id="moveToPrintHealthIDCard" | |
| style="margin: 5px" | |
| mat-raised-button | |
| color="primary" | |
| class="full-width-login pull-right m-r-5 mat_blue" | |
| (click)="generateAbhaCard()" | |
| > | |
| Generate ABHA Card | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| id="moveToGenerateHealthIDCard" | |
| style="margin: 5px" | |
| mat-raised-button | |
| color="primary" | |
| class="full-width-login pull-right m-r-5 mat_blue" | |
| (click)="generateAbhaCard()" | |
| > | |
| Generate ABHA Card | |
| </button> |
| it('should be created', () => { | ||
| expect(component).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reminder: Add actual tests.
The current test case is a placeholder. Please add actual tests to verify the functionality of the SearchDialogComponent.
Do you want me to generate some test cases or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
| describe('EditFamilyTaggingComponent', () => { | ||
| let component: EditFamilyTaggingComponent; | ||
| let fixture: ComponentFixture<EditFamilyTaggingComponent>; | ||
|
|
||
| beforeEach(async(() => { | ||
| TestBed.configureTestingModule({ | ||
| declarations: [EditFamilyTaggingComponent], | ||
| }).compileComponents(); | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| beforeEach(() => { | ||
| fixture = TestBed.createComponent(EditFamilyTaggingComponent); | ||
| component = fixture.componentInstance; | ||
| fixture.detectChanges(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should create', () => { | ||
| expect(component).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add more test cases.
The current test suite only checks if the component is created. It's missing test cases for the component's behavior.
Consider adding test cases to cover the following scenarios:
- Test the component's initialization.
- Test the component's interaction with the template.
- Test the component's methods.
- Test the component's input and output properties.
- Test the component's error handling.
Do you want me to generate the additional test cases or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
Biome
[error] 36-40: Disallow duplicate setup and teardown hooks.
Disallow beforeEach duplicacy inside the describe function.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateTestHooks)
| it('should create', () => { | ||
| expect(component).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add more test cases.
The single test case is just checking if the component is created.
Consider adding more test cases to verify the behavior and rendering of the component.
Do you want me to generate additional test cases or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
| ngOnInit(){ | ||
| this.serviceLine = localStorage.getItem('serviceName'); | ||
| this.fetchLanguageResponse(); | ||
| this.getRegistrationData(); | ||
| this.checkPatientRevisit(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider extracting logic from ngOnInit to improve readability and maintainability.
The ngOnInit method performs several tasks, such as retrieving data from local storage, fetching language response, getting registration data, checking patient revisit, and opening consent. This violates the Single Responsibility Principle and makes the method harder to understand and maintain.
Consider extracting some of the logic into separate methods or services to improve readability and maintainability. For example, you could move the language-related functionality to a separate service and the patient revisit check to a separate method.
| getRegistrationData(){ | ||
| let location: any = localStorage.getItem('locationData'); | ||
| let locationData = JSON.parse(location); | ||
| let services: any = localStorage.getItem('services'); | ||
| let servicesData = JSON.parse(services); | ||
| console.log('servicesData', servicesData); | ||
| let reqObj = { | ||
| serviceLine: localStorage.getItem('serviceName'), | ||
| serviceLineId: localStorage.getItem('serviceID'), | ||
| stateId: locationData.stateID, | ||
| districtId: locationData.districtID, | ||
| blockId: locationData.blockID, | ||
| serviceProviderId: servicesData[0].serviceProviderID | ||
| } | ||
| console.log('reqObj', reqObj); | ||
| this.registrationService.fetchAllRegistrationData(reqObj).subscribe((res: any) => { | ||
| if(res && res.data && res.statusCode === 200){ | ||
| if(res.data.length > 0){ | ||
| this.filterData(res.data); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert('No Project is mapped to the serviceline for choosed block', 'info') | ||
| } | ||
| }else { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert(res.errorMessage, 'error'); | ||
| } | ||
| }, (err: any) => { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert(err.errorMessage, 'error'); | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestions for improving the getRegistrationData method:
-
Provide more specific and informative error messages in the error handling block. Instead of a generic "issue in saving the data" message, include details about the error and possible solutions.
-
Extract the success response handling logic into a separate method to improve readability and maintainability. This will make the
getRegistrationDatamethod more focused and easier to understand. -
Replace the magic strings used for local storage keys with constants. This will make the code more maintainable and less prone to errors caused by typos or inconsistencies.
Tools
Biome
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
| submitBeneficiaryDetails() { | ||
| console.log('registration data', this.mainForm); | ||
| const newDate = this.dateFormatChange(); | ||
| const valueToSend = this.mainForm.value; | ||
| valueToSend.personalInfoForm.dob = newDate; | ||
| const iEMRForm: any = this.iEMRForm(); | ||
| const phoneMaps = iEMRForm.benPhoneMaps; | ||
|
|
||
| // createdBy, vanID, servicePointID | ||
| const serviceLineDetails: any = localStorage.getItem('serviceLineDetails'); | ||
| const servicePointDetails = JSON.parse(serviceLineDetails); | ||
| iEMRForm['vanID'] = servicePointDetails.vanID; | ||
| iEMRForm['parkingPlaceID'] = servicePointDetails.parkingPlaceID; | ||
| iEMRForm['createdBy'] = localStorage.getItem('userName'); | ||
| iEMRForm['providerServiceMapID'] = localStorage.getItem('providerServiceID'); | ||
| iEMRForm['providerServiceMapId'] = localStorage.getItem('providerServiceID'); | ||
| phoneMaps[0]['vanID'] = servicePointDetails.vanID; | ||
| phoneMaps[0]['parkingPlaceID'] = servicePointDetails.parkingPlaceID; | ||
| phoneMaps[0]['createdBy'] = localStorage.getItem('userName'); | ||
| console.log('iemrform', iEMRForm); | ||
| const mainForm = this.mainFormData(); | ||
| console.log('mainForm', mainForm); | ||
| console.log('personalInfoFormGENDER', this.mainForm.controls['personalInfoForm'].value); | ||
| const remaingData = this.findMissingKeys(iEMRForm, mainForm) | ||
| let finalRqObj = { | ||
| ...remaingData, | ||
| ...iEMRForm | ||
| } | ||
| console.log('finalRqObj', finalRqObj); | ||
| this.registrarService.submitBeneficiary(finalRqObj).subscribe((res: any) => { | ||
| if (res.statusCode === 200) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert(res.data.response, 'success'); | ||
| const responseValue = res.data.response; | ||
| const benId = responseValue.replace(/^\D+/g, ''); | ||
| const txt = res.data.response; | ||
| const numb = txt.replace(/\D/g, ''); | ||
| const reqObj = { | ||
| beneficiaryRegID: null, | ||
| beneficiaryID: numb, | ||
| healthId: this.mainForm.controls['abhaInfoForm'].value['abha'], | ||
| healthIdNumber: this.mainForm.controls['abhaInfoForm'].value['abha'], | ||
| providerServiceMapId: localStorage.getItem('providerServiceID'), | ||
| authenticationMode: null, | ||
| createdBy: localStorage.getItem('userName'), | ||
| }; | ||
| if | ||
| (this.mainForm.controls['abhaInfoForm'].value['abha'] !== undefined && | ||
| this.mainForm.controls['abhaInfoForm'].value['abha'] !== null) { | ||
| this.registrarService.mapHealthId(reqObj).subscribe((res: any) => { | ||
| if (res.statusCode === 200) { | ||
| // this.confirmationService.alert(res.data.response, 'success'); | ||
| console.log('success'); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.issueInSavngData, | ||
| 'error', | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| this.mainForm.reset(); | ||
| this.disableGenerateOTP = false; | ||
| // this.confirmationService.alert(res.data.response, 'success'); | ||
| // this.mainForm.reset(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| else { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.issueInSavngData, | ||
| 'error', | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // else { | ||
| // this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| // 'issue in saving the data', | ||
| // 'error' | ||
| // ); | ||
| // } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor the submitBeneficiaryDetails method to improve maintainability and readability.
The submitBeneficiaryDetails method is quite complex and violates the Single Responsibility Principle. Here are a few suggestions to improve it:
-
Extract the data manipulation logic (e.g.,
iEMRForm,findMissingKeys) into separate methods or services. This will make the code more modular, reusable, and easier to test. -
Move the API call and response handling to a dedicated service. This will separate concerns, improve testability, and make the component more focused.
-
Use more descriptive variable names to improve code readability. For example,
finalRqObjcould be renamed tofinalRequestObjectorbeneficiaryDetailsRequest. -
Handle errors more gracefully and provide informative error messages. Instead of generic messages like "issue in saving the data", include details about the error and possible solutions.
By applying these refactorings, the submitBeneficiaryDetails method will become more maintainable, readable, and easier to understand.
| updateBeneficiaryDetails(passToNurse = false) { | ||
| const finalReqObj: any = this.updateBenDataManipulation(); | ||
| finalReqObj['passToNurse'] = passToNurse; | ||
|
|
||
| this.registrarService | ||
| .updateBeneficiary(finalReqObj) | ||
| .subscribe((res: any) => { | ||
| if (res && res.statusCode === 200) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert(res.data.response, 'success'); | ||
| const personalForm = Object.assign( | ||
| {}, | ||
| this.mainForm.value.personalInfoForm, | ||
| ); | ||
| console.log("personalForm",personalForm); | ||
| const reqObj = { | ||
| beneficiaryRegID: null, | ||
| beneficiaryID: personalForm.beneficiaryID, | ||
| healthId: this.mainForm.controls['abhaInfoForm'].value['abha'], | ||
| healthIdNumber: this.mainForm.controls['abhaInfoForm'].value['abha'], | ||
| authenticationMode: null, | ||
| providerServiceMapId: localStorage.getItem('providerServiceID'), | ||
| createdBy: localStorage.getItem('userName'), | ||
| }; | ||
| this.router.navigate(['/registrar/search/']); | ||
| } | ||
| else { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert(res.errorMessage, 'error'); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor the updateBeneficiaryDetails method to improve maintainability and readability.
The updateBeneficiaryDetails method can be improved in a similar way to the submitBeneficiaryDetails method:
-
Extract the data manipulation logic from
updateBenDataManipulationinto separate methods or services. This will make the code more modular, reusable, and easier to test. -
Move the API call and response handling to a dedicated service. This will separate concerns, improve testability, and make the component more focused.
-
Use more descriptive variable names to improve code readability. For example,
reqObjcould be renamed toupdateBeneficiaryRequestorhealthIdMappingRequest. -
Provide more informative error messages in the error handling block. Instead of a generic "issue in saving the data" message, include details about the error and possible solutions.
By applying these refactorings, the updateBeneficiaryDetails method will become more maintainable, readable, and easier to understand.
| } | ||
| console.log('reqObj', reqObj); | ||
| this.registrationService.fetchAllRegistrationData(reqObj).subscribe((res: any) => { | ||
| if(res && res.data && res.statusCode === 200){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use optional chaining to prevent potential runtime errors.
The static analysis tool suggests using optional chaining when accessing the data property at line 214. Optional chaining ensures that the code doesn't throw an error if the res object or its data property is undefined or null.
Consider updating the code to use optional chaining as follows:
if (res?.data?.length > 0) {
// ...
}This will make the code more robust and less prone to runtime errors.
Tools
Biome
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (1)
162-181: Fix the placement of thebreakandreturnstatements.The
allowTextValidatormethod correctly returns the appropriate regular expression based on theallowTextparameter. However, there is a minor issue with the placement of thebreakstatement and thereturnstatement.Apply this diff to fix the placement of the
breakandreturnstatements:- default: - regex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9 ]*$/; - break; // Add break statement here - } - - return regex; // Move this line outside the switch block + default: + regex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9 ]*$/; + } + return regex;
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts
[error] 232-232: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 728-728: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 731-731: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 737-737: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 741-743: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 746-748: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 751-751: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 754-755: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 802-802: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 811-811: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 434-434: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
Additional comments not posted (13)
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.html (5)
2-2: LGTM!The form structure and bindings look good. The use of reactive forms with dynamic form field generation based on the
formDataarray is a nice approach. The bindings to theitemobject properties ensure that the form fields are correctly configured.Also applies to: 36-42, 53-64, 67-74, 76-84, 86-95
6-21: *Simplify the ngIf conditions and improve accessibility.Consider simplifying the
*ngIfconditions for showing the default avatar or the uploaded image. Instead of using two separate*ngIfconditions, you can use a single condition with anelseblock:<div *ngIf="personalInfoFormGroup.value?.image; else defaultAvatar"> <a> <img [src]="personalInfoFormGroup.value.image" class="img-circle thumbnail-120" alt="Uploaded Beneficiary Image" /> </a> </div> <ng-template #defaultAvatar> <a> <img src="assets/images/default-avatar.gif" class="img-circle thumbnail-120" alt="Default Avatar" /> </a> </ng-template>Also, consider using a more descriptive
alttext for the uploaded image to improve accessibility.Verify that the
captureImage()method is correctly implemented in the component class to handle the image upload functionality.
40-40: LGTM!The form validations and error messages look comprehensive and cover various scenarios. The use of
<mat-error>elements provides a consistent way to display validation errors. The custom validation forageAtMarriageis a good addition to ensure data integrity.Also applies to: 43-50
53-64: LGTM!The date picker controls are implemented correctly and follow Angular Material's date picker usage. The
(dateChange)event is a good way to trigger validations when the date value changes. Setting themaxattribute totomorrowfor the "Date of Birth" field is a nice touch to prevent selecting future dates.
1-101: LGTM!The form template follows good accessibility and semantic practices:
- The use of
<mat-form-field>elements ensures that the form fields have proper accessibility attributes and behaviors.- The
<mat-label>elements provide clear labels for the form fields, enhancing usability and accessibility.- The
placeholderattributes give additional context to the users about the expected input format or value.- The
requiredattributes help convey which fields are mandatory, improving the form's usability.Overall, the form template is well-structured and follows Angular's reactive forms approach, making it accessible and user-friendly.
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (8)
86-112: LGTM!The constructor correctly initializes the
tomorrowproperty and subscribes to theregistrationABHADetails$observable to populate form fields with the received response data. The implementation looks good.
114-148: LGTM!The
ngOnInitmethod correctly initializes the form controls based on the providedformData. It adds necessary form controls, validators, and patches the form withrevisitDatafor patient revisit. The implementation looks good.
156-160: LGTM!The
setDateLimitsmethod correctly sets thetodayandminDateproperties for the calendar. It calculates theminDateby subtractingageLimit + 1years from the current date. The implementation looks good.
183-191: LGTM!The
onInputChangedmethod correctly handles the input change event and limits the input value to the providedmaxLength. The implementation looks good.
193-204: LGTM!The
captureImagemethod correctly captures an image using thecameraServiceand updates theimageform control with the captured image. For patient revisit, it also sets theimageChangeFlagform control totrue. The implementation looks good.
210-222: LGTM!The
loadMasterDataObservablemethod correctly loads the master data from theregistrationMasterDetails$observable and assigns it to themasterDataproperty. For patient revisit, it calls theloadPersonalDataForEditingmethod. The implementation looks good.
229-239: LGTM!The
loadPersonalDataForEditingmethod correctly loads the personal data for editing from thebeneficiaryEditDetails$observable. It assigns the response to therevisitDataproperty, validates the marital status master, pushes the editing data to the form, and retrieves the beneficiary image. The implementation looks good.Tools
Biome
[error] 232-232: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
315-328: LGTM!The
changeLiteracyStatusmethod correctly handles the literacy status change and resets theeducationQualificationform control if the literacy status is not 'Literate'. The implementation looks good.
| onGenderSelected() { | ||
| const genderMaster = this.masterData.genderMaster; | ||
| genderMaster.forEach((element: any, i: any) => { | ||
| if (element.genderID === this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| genderName: element.genderName, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log( | ||
| 'this.masterData', | ||
| genderMaster, | ||
| this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender === 3) { | ||
| this.confirmationService | ||
| .confirm('info', 'You have selected Transgender, please confirm') | ||
| .subscribe( | ||
| res => { | ||
| if (!res) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| gender: null, | ||
| genderName: null, | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster; | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| err => {} | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster.filter( | ||
| (maritalStatus: any) => { | ||
| if ( | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender === 1 && | ||
| maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 5 | ||
| ) { | ||
| return maritalStatus; | ||
| } | ||
| if ( | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender === 2 && | ||
| maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 6 | ||
| ) { | ||
| return maritalStatus; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider extracting the common logic for assigning the maritalStatusMaster.
The code for assigning the maritalStatusMaster based on the selected gender is duplicated in the onGenderSelected method. Consider extracting this logic into a separate method to improve code reusability and maintainability.
private assignMaritalStatusMaster(gender: number) {
if (gender === 3) {
this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster;
} else {
this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster.filter(
(maritalStatus: any) => {
if (gender === 1 && maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 5) {
return maritalStatus;
}
if (gender === 2 && maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 6) {
return maritalStatus;
}
}
);
}
}Then, update the onGenderSelected method to call the assignMaritalStatusMaster method:
onGenderSelected() {
// ...
if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender === 3) {
this.confirmationService
.confirm('info', 'You have selected Transgender, please confirm')
.subscribe(
res => {
if (!res) {
this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({
gender: null,
genderName: null,
});
} else {
this.assignMaritalStatusMaster(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender);
}
},
err => {}
);
} else {
this.assignMaritalStatusMaster(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender);
}
}| validateMaritalStatusMaster(revisitData: any) { | ||
| if (revisitData.m_gender.genderID === 3) { | ||
| this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster; | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster.filter( | ||
| (maritalStatus: any) => { | ||
| if ( | ||
| revisitData.m_gender.genderID === 1 && | ||
| maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 5 | ||
| ) { | ||
| return maritalStatus; | ||
| } | ||
| if ( | ||
| revisitData.m_gender.genderID === 2 && | ||
| maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 6 | ||
| ) { | ||
| return maritalStatus; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reuse the assignMaritalStatusMaster method.
The logic for filtering the maritalStatusMaster based on the gender ID is similar to the logic in the onGenderSelected method. Consider reusing the assignMaritalStatusMaster method (suggested in the previous comment) in the validateMaritalStatusMaster method to avoid code duplication.
validateMaritalStatusMaster(revisitData: any) {
this.assignMaritalStatusMaster(revisitData.m_gender.genderID);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (5)
83-106: Consider breaking down the component into smaller, focused components.The
PersonalInformationComponenthas a lot of responsibilities, including form setup, form value changes, data loading, and data editing. This can make the component harder to understand and maintain.Consider breaking down the component into smaller, focused components that each handle a specific responsibility. For example, you could have separate components for form setup, form value changes, data loading, and data editing.
This would make the code more modular, reusable, and easier to test.
146-156: Use more descriptive names for variables and methods.The
setDateLimitsmethod uses variables liketodayandminDate, which are not very descriptive. Consider using more descriptive names likecurrentDateandminBirthDateto make the code more readable.
319-332: Consider renaming thechangeLiteracyStatusmethod.The
changeLiteracyStatusmethod name suggests that it changes the literacy status, but it actually resets theeducationQualificationform control based on the literacy status. Consider renaming the method to something more descriptive, likeresetEducationQualificationBasedOnLiteracyStatus.
407-421: Consider using a more descriptive name for thesetupFormValueChangesmethod.The
setupFormValueChangesmethod name doesn't clearly describe what the method does. Consider renaming the method to something more descriptive, likesetupAgeAndDOBValueChanges, since it sets up value changes for the age, age units, and date of birth form controls.
518-523: Consider renaming thecheckFieldValidationsmethod.The
checkFieldValidationsmethod name suggests that it checks the field validations, but it actually calls other methods based on the field name. Consider renaming the method to something more descriptive, likecallMethodsBasedOnFieldName.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.html (1 hunks)
- src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/registrar/registration/abha-information/abha-information.component.html
- src/registrar/registration/location-information/location-information.component.html
- src/registrar/registration/other-information/other-information.component.html
Additional context used
Biome
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts
[error] 191-191: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 192-192: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
[error] 236-236: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 732-732: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 735-735: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 741-741: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 745-747: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 750-752: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 755-755: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 758-759: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 806-806: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 815-815: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 438-438: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
Additional comments not posted (10)
src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.html (5)
2-193: LGTM!The form implementation using Angular's reactive forms with dynamic rendering based on the
formDataarray is a good approach. The form bindings and conditional rendering of form controls based onfieldTypeare implemented correctly.
46-83: LGTM!The form control bindings using the
formControlNamedirective and the conditional application of therequiredvalidator based on theisRequiredproperty are implemented correctly. Theminlengthvalidator for text inputs and the custom validation forageAtMarriageare also properly implemented.
1-194: LGTM!The usage of Angular Material components throughout the form provides a consistent and visually appealing UI. The
mat-form-field,mat-datepicker,mat-radio-group,mat-radio-button, andmat-selectcomponents are used appropriately for their respective form control types.
1-194: LGTM!The form demonstrates good accessibility practices. The usage of
mat-labelfor labeling form fields,placeholderattribute for additional guidance,altattribute for the profile image, andreadonlyattribute for the date input field enhances the accessibility and user experience of the form.
58-83: LGTM!The form's error handling is implemented correctly. The usage of
mat-errorcomponents for displaying error messages and the conditional display based on the form control's validation state provides clear feedback to the user. Therequired,minlength, and customageAtMarriagevalidation error messages are displayed properly.src/registrar/registration/personal-information/personal-information.component.ts (5)
245-294: Consider extracting the common logic for assigning themaritalStatusMaster.The code for assigning the
maritalStatusMasterbased on the selected gender is duplicated in theonGenderSelectedmethod. Consider extracting this logic into a separate method to improve code reusability and maintainability.private assignMaritalStatusMaster(gender: number) { if (gender === 3) { this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster; } else { this.maritalStatusMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster.filter( (maritalStatus: any) => { if (gender === 1 && maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 5) { return maritalStatus; } if (gender === 2 && maritalStatus.maritalStatusID !== 6) { return maritalStatus; } } ); } }Then, update the
onGenderSelectedmethod to call theassignMaritalStatusMastermethod:onGenderSelected() { // ... if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender === 3) { this.confirmationService .confirm('info', 'You have selected Transgender, please confirm') .subscribe( res => { if (!res) { this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ gender: null, genderName: null, }); } else { this.assignMaritalStatusMaster(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender); } }, err => {} ); } else { this.assignMaritalStatusMaster(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.gender); } }
296-317: Reuse theassignMaritalStatusMastermethod.The logic for filtering the
maritalStatusMasterbased on the gender ID is similar to the logic in theonGenderSelectedmethod. Consider reusing theassignMaritalStatusMastermethod (suggested in the previous comment) in thevalidateMaritalStatusMastermethod to avoid code duplication.validateMaritalStatusMaster(revisitData: any) { this.assignMaritalStatusMaster(revisitData.m_gender.genderID); }
423-430: LGTM!The
onAgeOrUnitEnteredmethod correctly calculates the date of birth when both age and age units are entered.
528-537: LGTM!The
onIncomeChangedmethod correctly updates theincomeNameform control based on the selected income ID.
580-587: LGTM!The
clearMarriageDetailsmethod correctly clears thespouseNameandageAtMarriageform controls if they have a value.
| ngOnInit() { | ||
| this.formData.forEach((item: any) => { | ||
| if (item.fieldName && item.allowText) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.addControl( | ||
| item.fieldName, | ||
| new FormControl(null, [ | ||
| Validators.pattern(this.allowTextValidator(item.allowText)), | ||
| Validators.minLength(parseInt(item?.allowMin)), | ||
| Validators.maxLength(parseInt(item?.allowMax)), | ||
| ]), | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.addControl( | ||
| item.fieldName, | ||
| new FormControl(null), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.addControl('image', new FormControl()); | ||
| console.log('personalInfoFormGroup Data', this.personalInfoFormGroup); | ||
| if (this.patientRevisit) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.addControl( | ||
| 'beneficiaryRegID', | ||
| new FormControl(), | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.addControl('beneficiaryID', new FormControl()); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue(this.revisitData); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup | ||
| .get('phoneNo') | ||
| ?.patchValue(this.revisitData.benPhoneMaps[0].phoneNo); | ||
| } | ||
| console.log('personal Form Data', this.formData); | ||
| console.log('this.revist data - personal info', this.revisitData); | ||
| this.setupFormValueChanges(); | ||
|
|
||
| this.setDateLimits(); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider simplifying the form setup and value change logic.
The ngOnInit method has complex logic for setting up form controls, listening to form value changes, and calling other methods. This can make the code harder to understand and maintain.
Consider simplifying the form setup and value change logic by:
- Using a separate method for setting up form controls.
- Using a separate method for listening to form value changes.
- Using a separate method for calling other methods based on form value changes.
This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
| allowTextValidator(allowText: any) { | ||
| let regex: RegExp; | ||
|
|
||
| switch (allowText) { | ||
| case 'alpha': | ||
| regex = /^[a-zA-Z]*$/; | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'numeric': | ||
| regex = /^[0-9]*$/; | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'alphaNumeric': | ||
| regex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9]*$/; | ||
| break; | ||
| default: | ||
| regex = /^[a-zA-Z0-9 ]*$/; | ||
| break; // Add break statement here | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return regex; // Move this line outside the switch block | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a more robust validation library.
The allowTextValidator method uses a switch statement to determine the regular expression for validating input based on the allowText parameter. This can be error-prone and hard to maintain.
Consider using a more robust validation library like Validator.js or class-validator to handle input validation. This would make the code more reliable and easier to maintain.
| if (currentErrors && currentErrors['maxlength']) { | ||
| delete currentErrors['maxlength']; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the unsafe delete operator usage.
The code uses the delete operator to remove the maxlength error from the form control. This can impact performance and is considered unsafe.
Consider using an undefined assignment instead, like this:
if (currentErrors && currentErrors['maxlength']) {
currentErrors['maxlength'] = undefined;
}This would avoid the performance impact of the delete operator.
Tools
Biome
[error] 191-191: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 192-192: Avoid the delete operator which can impact performance.
Unsafe fix: Use an undefined assignment instead.
(lint/performance/noDelete)
| captureImage() { | ||
| this.cameraService.capture().subscribe((result: any) => { | ||
| if (result) { | ||
| if (this.patientRevisit) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| imageChangeFlag: true, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ image: result }); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider moving the image capture logic to a separate service.
The captureImage method uses the cameraService to capture an image and patch the form value. This logic could be moved to a separate service to make the component more focused and easier to test.
For example, you could create an ImageCaptureService with a captureImage method that returns an observable of the captured image. Then, you could inject this service into the component and use it to capture the image and patch the form value.
This would make the component more focused and easier to test.
| loadMasterDataObservable() { | ||
| this.masterDataSubscription = | ||
| this.registrarService.registrationMasterDetails$.subscribe((res) => { | ||
| // console.log('res personal', res) | ||
| if (res !== null) { | ||
| this.masterData = res; | ||
| console.log('masterData'); | ||
| if (this.patientRevisit) { | ||
| this.loadPersonalDataForEditing(); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider moving the master data loading logic to a separate service.
The loadMasterDataObservable method subscribes to the registrarService.registrationMasterDetails$ observable and assigns the result to the masterData property. This logic could be moved to a separate service to make the component more focused and easier to test.
For example, you could create a MasterDataService with a getMasterData method that returns an observable of the master data. Then, you could inject this service into the component and use it to load the master data.
This would make the component more focused and easier to test.
| getParentDetails() { | ||
| const searchTerm = this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.phoneNo; | ||
| const searchObject = { | ||
| beneficiaryRegID: null, | ||
| beneficiaryID: null, | ||
| phoneNo: null, | ||
| }; | ||
| if (searchTerm && searchTerm.trim().length === 10) { | ||
| searchObject['phoneNo'] = searchTerm; | ||
| this.registrarService.identityQuickSearch(searchObject).subscribe( | ||
| (beneficiaryList: any) => { | ||
| if ( | ||
| beneficiaryList && | ||
| beneficiaryList.length > 0 && | ||
| beneficiaryList[0].benPhoneMaps.length > 0 | ||
| ) { | ||
| console.log( | ||
| 'ta d ad a d a', | ||
| JSON.stringify(beneficiaryList, null, 4), | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| parentRegID: beneficiaryList[0].benPhoneMaps[0].parentBenRegID, | ||
| parentRelation: 11, | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.parentRegID); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| parentRegID: null, | ||
| parentRelation: 1, | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.parentRegID); | ||
|
|
||
| if (this.patientRevisit) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| parentRegID: this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.beneficiaryRegID, | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.parentRegID); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| (error) => { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert(error, 'error'); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| parentRegID: null, | ||
| parentRelation: 1, | ||
| phoneNo: null, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| if (this.patientRevisit) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| parentRegID: this._parentBenRegID, | ||
| parentRelation: null, | ||
| phoneNo: null, | ||
| }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| parentRegID: null, | ||
| parentRelation: null, | ||
| phoneNo: null, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider breaking down the getParentDetails method into smaller methods.
The getParentDetails method has complex logic for searching and assigning parent details based on the phone number. Consider breaking down this method into smaller methods that each handle a specific responsibility, like searching for the parent details, assigning the parent details, and handling errors.
This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
| calculateDOB() { | ||
| const ageValue = this.personalInfoFormGroup.get('age')!.value; | ||
| const ageUnits = this.personalInfoFormGroup.get('ageUnits')!.value; | ||
|
|
||
| if (ageValue && ageUnits) { | ||
| const valueEntered = parseInt(ageValue, 10); | ||
| if (!isNaN(valueEntered)) { | ||
| if ( | ||
| valueEntered > this.ageLimit && | ||
| ageUnits.toLowerCase() === 'years' | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| 'Age can only be set between Today to 120 Years', | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ age: null }); | ||
| } else { | ||
| const dob = moment().subtract(valueEntered, ageUnits).toDate(); | ||
| const fromDate = moment(dob).toISOString(); | ||
| console.log('dob after conversion', fromDate); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue( | ||
| { | ||
| dOB: fromDate, | ||
| }, | ||
| { emitEvent: false }, | ||
| ); // Prevent emitting the event to avoid circular updates | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Number.isNaN instead of isNaN.
The calculateDOB method uses the isNaN function to check if the entered age is a valid number. However, isNaN is considered unsafe because it attempts a type coercion.
Consider using Number.isNaN instead, like this:
if (ageValue && ageUnits) {
const valueEntered = parseInt(ageValue, 10);
if (!Number.isNaN(valueEntered)) {
// ...
}
}This would avoid the type coercion and make the code safer.
Tools
Biome
[error] 438-438: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
| dobChangeByCalender() { | ||
| const dobValue = this.personalInfoFormGroup.get('dOB')?.value; | ||
| const today = new Date(); | ||
| if (dobValue) { | ||
| this.dateForCalendar = moment(dobValue); | ||
| const date = new Date(this.dateForCalendar); | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| this.dateForCalendar && | ||
| dobValue && | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.controls['dOB'].valid | ||
| ) { | ||
| const dateDiff = Date.now() - date.getTime(); | ||
| const age = new Date(dateDiff); | ||
| const yob = Math.abs(age.getUTCFullYear() - 1970); | ||
| const mob = Math.abs(age.getUTCMonth()); | ||
| const dob = Math.abs(age.getUTCDate() - 1); | ||
| if (yob > 0) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue( | ||
| { age: yob, ageUnits: 'Years' }, | ||
| { emitEvent: false }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } else if (mob > 0) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue( | ||
| { age: mob, ageUnits: 'Months' }, | ||
| { emitEvent: false }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } else if (dob > 0) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue( | ||
| { age: dob, ageUnits: 'Days' }, | ||
| { emitEvent: false }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (date.setHours(0, 0, 0, 0) === today.setHours(0, 0, 0, 0)) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue( | ||
| { age: 1, ageUnits: 'Days' }, | ||
| { emitEvent: false }, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.checkAgeAtMarriage(); | ||
| } else if (dobValue === 'Invalid date') { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ dOB: null }); | ||
| this.dateForCalendar = null; | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.invalidData, | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ age: null }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider extracting the date difference calculation logic into a separate method.
The dobChangeByCalender method has complex logic for calculating the age based on the selected date of birth. Consider extracting this logic into a separate method that takes the date of birth as a parameter and returns an object with the calculated age values.
For example:
private calculateAgeFromDOB(dob: Date): { years: number; months: number; days: number } {
const today = new Date();
const dateDiff = today.getTime() - dob.getTime();
const age = new Date(dateDiff);
const years = age.getUTCFullYear() - 1970;
const months = age.getUTCMonth();
const days = age.getUTCDate() - 1;
return { years, months, days };
}Then, you could use this method in the dobChangeByCalender method like this:
const age = this.calculateAgeFromDOB(date);
if (age.years > 0) {
this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ age: age.years, ageUnits: 'Years' }, { emitEvent: false });
} else if (age.months > 0) {
this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ age: age.months, ageUnits: 'Months' }, { emitEvent: false });
} else if (age.days > 0) {
this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ age: age.days, ageUnits: 'Days' }, { emitEvent: false });
}This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
| onMaritalStatusChanged() { | ||
| if ( | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.maritalStatus === 1 || | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.maritalStatus === 7 | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.enableMarriageDetails = false; | ||
| this.clearMarriageDetails(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.enableMarriageDetails = true; | ||
| } | ||
| if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.maritalStatus === 2) { | ||
| this.enableSpouseMandatory = true; | ||
| this.clearMarriageDetails(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.enableSpouseMandatory = false; | ||
| this.clearMarriageDetails(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const maritalMaster = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster; | ||
| maritalMaster.forEach((element: any, i: any) => { | ||
| if ( | ||
| element.maritalStatusID === | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.maritalStatus | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ | ||
| maritalStatusName: element.status, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider extracting the common logic for updating the maritalStatusName.
The onMaritalStatusChanged method has duplicated logic for updating the maritalStatusName form control based on the selected marital status ID. Consider extracting this logic into a separate method to improve code reusability and maintainability.
For example:
private updateMaritalStatusName(maritalStatusId: number) {
const maritalStatus = this.masterData.maritalStatusMaster.find(
(status: any) => status.maritalStatusID === maritalStatusId
);
if (maritalStatus) {
this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({
maritalStatusName: maritalStatus.status,
});
}
}Then, you could call this method in the onMaritalStatusChanged method like this:
onMaritalStatusChanged() {
// ...
this.updateMaritalStatusName(this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.maritalStatus);
}This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
| checkAgeAtMarriage() { | ||
| if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.ageAtMarriage !== null) { | ||
| if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.age === null) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.pleaseenterBeneficiaryagefirst, | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ ageAtMarriage: null }); | ||
| } else if ( | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.ageUnits.toLowerCase() !== 'years' | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.marriageAge + | ||
| ' ' + | ||
| this.ageforMarriage + | ||
| ' ' + | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.years, | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ ageAtMarriage: null }); | ||
| } else if (this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.age < this.ageforMarriage) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.marriageAge + | ||
| ' ' + | ||
| this.ageforMarriage + | ||
| ' ' + | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.years, | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ ageAtMarriage: null }); | ||
| } else if ( | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.ageAtMarriage < this.ageforMarriage | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.marriageAge + | ||
| ' ' + | ||
| this.ageforMarriage + | ||
| ' ' + | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.alerts.info.years, | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ ageAtMarriage: null }); | ||
| } else if ( | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.age - | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.value.ageAtMarriage < | ||
| 0 | ||
| ) { | ||
| this.confirmationService.alert( | ||
| this.currentLanguageSet.common.marriageatageismorethantheactualage, | ||
| 'info', | ||
| ); | ||
| this.personalInfoFormGroup.patchValue({ ageAtMarriage: null }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider breaking down the checkAgeAtMarriage method into smaller methods.
The checkAgeAtMarriage method has complex logic for validating the age at marriage based on various conditions. Consider breaking down this method into smaller methods that each handle a specific validation, like checking if the age is entered, checking if the age units are in years, checking if the age is greater than the minimum marriage age, and checking if the age at marriage is less than the current age.
This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts (1)
162-184: Consider removing commented out lines.The
callBeneficiaryDataObservablemethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for retrieving and processing the beneficiary revisit data. However, there are commented out lines (176-177) that parse theotherFieldsJSON. If these lines are no longer needed, consider removing them to keep the code clean and maintainable.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
Additional comments not posted (11)
src/registrar/registration/registration.component.ts (11)
72-78: LGTM!The
minValidatormethod is implemented correctly and follows best practices. It validates if a control's value is greater than or equal to a minimum value and returns the appropriate validation result.
80-86: LGTM!The
maxValidatormethod is implemented correctly and follows best practices. It validates if a control's value is less than or equal to a maximum value and returns the appropriate validation result.
88-111: LGTM!The
allowTextValidatormethod is implemented correctly and follows best practices. It provides a flexible way to validate text patterns based on theallowTextparameter using regular expressions. The method returns the appropriate validation result based on the pattern matching.
129-139: LGTM!The
checkPatientRevisitmethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic. It checks if the patient is revisiting based on the presence of abeneficiaryIDparameter in the route snapshot. If the patient is revisiting, it calls the necessary methods to handle the revisit scenario.
141-156: LGTM!The
openConsentmethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic. It opens theConsentFormComponentdialog if the patient is not revisiting and handles the consent status after the dialog is closed. The consent status is then sent to theregistrarServicefor further processing.
198-226: LGTM!The
getRegistrationDatamethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for fetching and processing registration data. It retrieves the necessary data from local storage, constructs the request object, and subscribes to thefetchAllRegistrationDatamethod of theregistrationService. The response is handled appropriately based on the success or error scenarios, and the data is filtered using thefilterDatamethod if available.Tools
Biome
[error] 214-214: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
228-248: LGTM!The
filterDatamethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for filtering and processing the registration data. It efficiently groups the data by section name and section ID using thereducemethod, creating an array of objects with the structure{ sectionId, sectionName, fields }. It then sorts the fields within each section based on their rank using themapmethod. Finally, it calls theenableStepsmethod to enable the appropriate steps based on the filtered data.
250-271: LGTM!The
enableStepsmethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for enabling the appropriate steps based on the filtered registration data. It iterates over thefilteredFieldsDataarray and checks the section name to determine which steps to enable. It sets the correspondingenableflag and assigns the fields data to the respective properties based on the section name. Additionally, for the "ABHA Information" section, it checks theserviceLineproperty to determine if the step should be enabled.
319-400: LGTM!The
submitBeneficiaryDetailsmethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for submitting the beneficiary details. It retrieves the form values, performs the necessary data manipulation, and constructs the request object correctly. It calls thesubmitBeneficiarymethod of theregistrarServiceto submit the beneficiary details and handles the success and error scenarios appropriately. Additionally, it maps the health ID if available in the form.
402-477: LGTM!The
iEMRFormmethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for constructing the iEMR form object. It retrieves the necessary form values from thepersonalInfoForm,locationInfoForm,otherInfoForm, andabhaInfoFormform groups. It constructs thei_bendemographicsobject with the relevant form values and sets thegenderIDbased on the selected gender name. Additionally, it constructs thebenPhoneMapsarray with the phone number and phone type ID.
479-487: LGTM!The
mainFormDatamethod is implemented correctly and follows the expected logic for constructing the main form data object. It combines the values from thepersonalInfoForm,locationInfoForm,otherInfoForm, andabhaInfoFormform groups using the spread operator, resulting in a single object containing all the form data.
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
Add ESLint and NPM Audit workflow
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests