pull-request.yml updated #3288
pull-request.yml updated #3288
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
Line range hint
447-456: Critical: Branch strategy inconsistencyThere's a critical inconsistency in the branch strategy:
- PR objectives state PRs should target the
developbranch- The workflow enforces
develop-postgresas the target branch- Multiple jobs (
Test-Docusaurus-DeploymentandCheck-Target-Branch) enforce this requirementThis misalignment could cause confusion for contributors and potentially break the branching strategy.
Please:
- Clarify the correct target branch in documentation
- Update workflow conditions consistently
- Consider using environment variables for branch names to maintain consistency
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 433-433: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
430-433: Consider using LTS version of Node.jsThe change from Node.js 22.x to 20.x is good as 20.x is the current LTS version, while 22.x is not yet stable. However, consider pinning to a specific minor version for better reproducibility.
- node-version: '20.x' + node-version: '20.11.0' # Latest LTS version as of January 2025🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 433-433: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 433-433: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
436-442: LGTM! Package management standardizationThe switch from yarn to npm aligns with standard package management practices and ensures consistency with other jobs in the workflow that are already using npm.
443-446: Verify memory allocation necessityThe addition of memory allocation check is good for preventing OOM issues. However, this seems redundant as the build command is already executed in the previous step.
Consider removing this redundant step or consolidate with the previous build step:
- name: Test building the website working-directory: ./docs - run: npm run build - - - name: Check for Node.js memory issues - run: | - node --max-old-space-size=4096 ./node_modules/.bin/docusaurus build + run: | + export NODE_OPTIONS="--max-old-space-size=4096" + npm run build
424-424:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the branch condition alignment with PR guidelines
The condition
github.event.pull_request.base.ref == 'develop-postgres'seems inconsistent with the PR guidelines mentioned in the PR objectives, which state that PRs should be submitted against thedevelopbranch.
|
@may-tas is having some success here |
|
@palisadoes Can the issue be related to the cache in because it fails at this point, it does even reach to build. |
|
Give it a try |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit