pull-request.yml updated #3289
pull-request.yml updated #3289
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
436-438: Consider using package-lock.json for deterministic installations.While switching to npm is consistent with other jobs, consider using
npm ciinstead ofnpm installto ensure deterministic installations across different environments.- run: npm install + run: npm ci
433-433: Remove trailing whitespace.There is a trailing whitespace at the end of line 433.
- node-version: '20.x' + node-version: '20.x'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 433-433: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 433-433: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
424-424: LGTM! Job condition is properly configured.The condition correctly restricts the job to run only for non-dependabot PRs targeting the develop-postgres branch, maintaining consistency with the repository's branching strategy.
440-442: LGTM! Build command updated correctly.The build command has been properly updated to use npm, maintaining consistency with the package manager change.
| - name: Check for Node.js memory issues | ||
| run: | | ||
| node --max-old-space-size=4096 ./node_modules/.bin/docusaurus build | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant build step.
The additional build step with memory allocation is redundant as it runs after the previous build step. This could potentially:
- Overwrite the artifacts from the first build
- Unnecessarily increase the workflow execution time
Instead, modify the original build step to include the memory allocation:
- name: Test building the website
working-directory: ./docs
- run: npm run build
+ run: node --max-old-space-size=4096 ./node_modules/.bin/docusaurus buildCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| - name: Set up Node.js | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: '22.x' | ||
| cache: yarn | ||
| cache-dependency-path: 'docs/' | ||
| # Run Docusaurus in the ./docs directory | ||
| node-version: '20.x' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
While changing to Node.js 20.x is correct, the same update is needed in other workflow files that still reference version 22:
.github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml: Line containingnode-version: 22.github/workflows/push.yml: Line containingnode-version: [22.x]
🔗 Analysis chain
Good fix! Node.js version change is appropriate.
Changing from Node.js 22.x to 20.x is correct as:
- Node.js 22.x is not yet released
- Version 20.x is the current LTS release
- This aligns with the version used in other jobs
Let's verify the Node.js version compatibility with all dependencies:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for Node.js engine requirements
jq '.engines.node' docs/package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No Node.js version specified in package.json"
# Check if any dependencies require Node.js >20.x
cd docs && npm ls 2>&1 | grep -i "required node version"
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all package.json files and check their Node.js engine requirements
fd package.json --type f --exec sh -c 'echo "=== {} ==="; jq -r ".engines.node // \"No Node.js version specified\"" {}' \;
# Check for any potential Node.js version references in workflow files
rg "node-version:" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 764
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 433-433: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3289 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 8.56% 89.99% +81.43%
=====================================================
Files 309 330 +21
Lines 7954 8519 +565
Branches 1763 1884 +121
=====================================================
+ Hits 681 7667 +6986
+ Misses 7196 598 -6598
- Partials 77 254 +177
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit