Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx #3468
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Priyanshu Thapliyal <[email protected]>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Priyanshuthapliyal2005 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on enhancing the test suite for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
|
@coderabbitai full-review |
|
@Priyanshuthapliyal2005 I'll perform a comprehensive review of all the changes in this PR. ✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
@coderabbitai summary |
✅ Actions performedSummary regeneration triggered. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.spec.tsx (4)
Line range hint
17-181: Consider extracting mock data to a separate file.The mock data is quite extensive and could be better organized by moving it to a separate file (e.g.,
__mocks__/orgPostMocks.ts). This would improve maintainability and make the test file more focused on test cases.
182-273: Enhance pagination mocks for better test coverage.The pagination mocks could be improved in two ways:
- Include actual post data in the edges array instead of empty arrays to test data rendering
- Use more meaningful cursor values that reflect the actual data structure
const nextPageMock = { // ... other properties result: { data: { organizations: [{ posts: { - edges: [], + edges: [{ + node: { + _id: 'post2', + title: 'Second Post', + text: 'Content for second post', + // ... other post properties + }, + cursor: 'post2' + }], pageInfo: { - startCursor: 'startCursor2', - endCursor: 'endCursor2', + startCursor: 'post2', + endCursor: 'post2', // ... other pageInfo properties } } }] } } };
957-1026: Improve pagination test descriptions and assertions.The pagination test cases could be more specific about what they're testing. Also, consider adding assertions to verify the actual data changes when navigating between pages.
- it('pagination controls work correctly', async () => { + it('should load next page of posts when clicking next button', async () => { // ... test code + // Add assertions to verify the actual posts changed }); - it('pagination buttons states are correctly set', async () => { + it('should disable pagination buttons when no more pages are available', async () => { // ... test code });Also applies to: 1028-1084
1151-1191: Add more specific error test cases.The error handling test case could be expanded to cover more specific error scenarios:
- Invalid title length
- Invalid content type
- Server errors
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.spec.tsx(17 hunks)src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
| it('handleAddMediaChange: uploading a file and verifying the preview', async () => { | ||
| render( | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> | ||
| <BrowserRouter> | ||
| <Provider store={store}> | ||
| <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> | ||
| <OrgPost /> | ||
| </I18nextProvider> | ||
| </Provider> | ||
| </BrowserRouter> | ||
| </MockedProvider>, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await wait(); | ||
|
|
||
| userEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('createPostModalBtn')); | ||
|
|
||
| const fileInput = screen.getByTestId('addMediaField'); | ||
| userEvent.upload(fileInput, formData.postImage); | ||
|
|
||
| const imagePreview = await screen.findByAltText('Post Image Preview'); | ||
| expect(imagePreview).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
|
|
||
| const closeButton = screen.getByTestId('mediaCloseButton'); | ||
| fireEvent.click(closeButton); | ||
| expect(imagePreview).not.toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate duplicate test cases.
These test cases test similar functionality (image upload and preview). Consider combining them into a single, comprehensive test case with multiple assertions.
- it('handleAddMediaChange: uploading a file and verifying the preview', async () => {
- // ... test code
- });
- it('Create post and preview', async () => {
- // ... similar test code
- });
+ it('handles media upload, preview, and removal correctly', async () => {
+ // Setup component
+ // Test image upload
+ // Test image preview
+ // Test image removal
+ // Test video upload
+ // Test video preview
+ // Test video removal
+ });Also applies to: 652-691
| it('Modal interactions: opening and closing the modal', async () => { | ||
| render( | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> | ||
| <BrowserRouter> | ||
| <Provider store={store}> | ||
| <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> | ||
| <OrgPost /> | ||
| </I18nextProvider> | ||
| </Provider> | ||
| </BrowserRouter> | ||
| </MockedProvider>, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await wait(); | ||
|
|
||
| const createPostModalBtn = screen.getByTestId('createPostModalBtn'); | ||
| userEvent.click(createPostModalBtn); | ||
|
|
||
| const modalTitle = screen.getByTestId('modalOrganizationHeader'); | ||
| expect(modalTitle).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
|
|
||
| const closeButton = screen.getByTestId(/modalOrganizationHeader/i); | ||
| userEvent.click(closeButton); | ||
|
|
||
| await wait(); | ||
|
|
||
| const closedModalTitle = screen.queryByText(/postDetail/i); | ||
| expect(closedModalTitle).not.toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate modal interaction test cases.
These test cases test the same modal functionality. Consider combining them into a single test case.
Also applies to: 692-722
| const successMock = { | ||
| request: { | ||
| query: CREATE_POST_MUTATION, | ||
| variables: { | ||
| title: 'Test Post', | ||
| text: 'Test Content', | ||
| organizationId: undefined, | ||
| file: '', | ||
| pinned: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| result: { | ||
| data: { | ||
| createPost: { | ||
| _id: '123', | ||
| title: 'Test Post', | ||
| text: 'Test Content', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Fix undefined organizationId in success mock.
The organizationId is marked as non-nullable (ID!) in the CREATE_POST_MUTATION definition, but the success mock uses undefined. This will cause the mutation to fail at runtime. The mock should use a valid ID value like other tests in the codebase (e.g., '123').
🔗 Analysis chain
Fix undefined organizationId in success mock.
The success mock has organizationId: undefined which might not accurately represent the real-world scenario where an organization ID is required for post creation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if organizationId is required in the actual mutation
ast-grep --pattern 'mutation createPost($organizationId: ID!) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the CREATE_POST_MUTATION definition
rg "CREATE_POST_MUTATION" -A 5
# Also search for createPost mutation with a more flexible pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'mutation createPost($_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 6958
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete CREATE_POST_MUTATION definition
rg -A 15 "export const CREATE_POST_MUTATION = gql`"
Length of output: 116
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of the mutations file
cat src/GraphQl/Mutations/mutations.ts
Length of output: 15253
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3468 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 1.90% 88.82% +86.92%
=====================================================
Files 316 338 +22
Lines 8249 8620 +371
Branches 1880 1918 +38
=====================================================
+ Hits 157 7657 +7500
+ Misses 8083 634 -7449
- Partials 9 329 +320 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx
Issue Number:
Fixes #3033
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Improvements