Remove qtape/tape property from QNode
#6825
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6825 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.60% 99.60% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 476 476
Lines 45178 45169 -9
==========================================
- Hits 44999 44990 -9
Misses 179 179 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
lillian542
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
astralcai
reviewed
Jan 15, 2025
andrijapau
commented
Jan 15, 2025
andrijapau
commented
Jan 15, 2025
astralcai
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2025
andrijapau
added
the
merge-ready ✔️
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Completing the deprecation cycle.
No idea why those tests didn't complain in CI before when it was first deprecated ... weird!
[sc-82149]