Double capacity of api instance #137
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We had attempted to move to the `c7g.xlarge` in a previous commit but unfortunately that uses a different chip architecture (ARM). There is also the c.xlarge but that is essentially the same price as the m4.xlarge except with half the RAM.
|
@cecilia-donnelly I didn't touch it in this PR since it's unrelated, but wanted to point out that staging and dev have a smaller image than prod for the |
|
Just for continuity of historical context: the previous attempt was now-closed PR #135. |
cecilia-donnelly
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is another attempt to increase the size of the api server (from
largetoxlarge).Note that we had attempted to move to the
c7g.xlargein a previous commit but unfortunately that uses a different chip architecture (ARM).I noticed that
taskrunneruses c.xlarge but that is essentially the same price as the m4.xlarge except with half the RAM, so it did not seem like a good choice.