Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refactor] Yet another small set of arch improvements + adding a lot of python tests #29

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

blefaudeux
Copy link
Contributor

@blefaudeux blefaudeux commented Nov 12, 2024

  • Remove SetDefaults() but expose Get**Configs() instead, easier to use / more foolproof and fewer lines
  • Adding a bunch of end to end tests on the python side to pin down the behavior vs. internal version
  • Better defaults
  • Better handling of the json configs (undefined fields get defaulted)
  • "Generator" <> "Source", guess what that it was more explicit

Sorry, something went wrong.

@blefaudeux blefaudeux marked this pull request as draft November 12, 2024 12:14
@blefaudeux blefaudeux force-pushed the ben/ml-2346-move-everything-to-the-public-datago branch 12 times, most recently from 2e36eb3 to be98434 Compare November 13, 2024 17:18
@blefaudeux blefaudeux force-pushed the ben/ml-2346-move-everything-to-the-public-datago branch from be98434 to d1cd2d8 Compare November 13, 2024 17:49
@blefaudeux blefaudeux changed the title [DRAFT] Yet another small refactor + adding a lot of python tests [refactor] Yet another small set of arch improvements + adding a lot of python tests Nov 13, 2024
@blefaudeux blefaudeux marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2024 17:50
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
from datago import datago
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these are new from this PR, still missing a few from the internal codebase but almost there

@blefaudeux blefaudeux merged commit 6531f57 into main Nov 13, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant