[Components] e2b - Run code action #14621
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
@jcortes is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pipedreamers Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new module for executing code snippets using the E2B service, encapsulated within Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/e2b/e2b.app.mjs (1)
1-16: Consider architectural improvements for better maintainabilityTo enhance the maintainability and developer experience:
- Add comprehensive JSDoc documentation explaining the E2B service integration
- Extract configuration values (e.g., timeout duration) to constants
- Consider implementing a proper sandbox pool management system for resource optimization
- Add TypeScript type definitions or JSDoc type annotations
Example documentation:
/** * @typedef {Object} E2BApp * @property {function(): Promise<Sandbox>} getSandbox - Creates a new E2B sandbox instance * @property {function(string): Promise<any>} runCode - Executes code in an E2B sandbox */ /** @type {E2BApp} */ export default { // ... existing code ... }components/e2b/actions/run-code/run-code.mjs (2)
6-6: Update documentation link to point to official E2B docsThe description currently links to the npm package documentation. Consider linking to the official E2B documentation (https://e2b.dev/docs) as mentioned in the linked issue #14569, as it would provide more comprehensive information about the service.
- description: "Run or interpret code using the E2B service. [See the documentation](https://www.npmjs.com/package/e2b).", + description: "Run or interpret code using the E2B service. [See the documentation](https://e2b.dev/docs).",
11-15: Enhance code property documentation and validationThe code property would benefit from additional information and validation:
- Add supported programming languages in the description
- Include any execution environment limitations or constraints
- Add validation to prevent empty code submission
code: { type: "string", label: "Code", - description: "The code that will be interpreted by the E2B service. Eg. `print('Hello, World!')`.", + description: "The code that will be interpreted by the E2B service. Supports languages: [list supported languages]. Note: [mention any execution constraints]. Example: `print('Hello, World!')`", + validateInput: (code) => { + if (!code?.trim()) { + return "Code cannot be empty"; + } + return true; + }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/e2b/actions/run-code/run-code.mjs(1 hunks)components/e2b/e2b.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/e2b/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/e2b/e2b.app.mjs (1)
1-6: LGTM! Clean module setup with clear dependencies.
The import statement and module structure are well-defined and follow best practices.
components/e2b/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM: Version bump follows semver.
The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features while maintaining backward compatibility.
15-17: Verify the dependency version constraints.
The addition of @e2b/code-interpreter is appropriate for the code execution functionality. However, let's verify if there are any known issues with version 1.0.3.
✅ Verification successful
Version constraint for @e2b/code-interpreter is appropriate
The dependency version ^1.0.3 is correctly specified and compatible with the project:
- The package is properly imported and used in
e2b.app.mjs - Node.js engine requirement (>=18) is the only constraint
- No peer dependencies are required
- The caret (^) semver allows for compatible updates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential issues with the e2b dependency version
# Test: Check if package.json exists in other directories to ensure version consistency
echo "Checking for other e2b dependencies in the project..."
fd --type f "package.json" --exec rg -l "@e2b/code-interpreter"
# Test: Look for any e2b-related configuration files that might need updates
echo "Checking for e2b configuration files..."
fd --type f "e2b.config" --type f ".e2brc"
Length of output: 432
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any usage patterns and potential version constraints
# Check for imports or usage of @e2b/code-interpreter
echo "Checking for e2b code interpreter usage patterns..."
rg "@e2b/code-interpreter" -B 2 -A 2
# Check if there are any peer dependencies or version requirements
echo "Checking for any peer dependency requirements..."
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@e2b/code-interpreter/1.0.3 | jq '.peerDependencies, .engines'
# Look for any migration guides or breaking changes
echo "Checking for any migration guides or documentation..."
fd --type f "README" --type f "CHANGELOG" --exec rg -l -i "e2b|migration|breaking"
Length of output: 1575
components/e2b/actions/run-code/run-code.mjs (2)
1-29: Verify consistency with existing code execution actions
Let's check if there are similar code execution actions in the codebase to ensure consistent implementation patterns.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find similar code execution actions in the codebase
# Expected: Identify patterns used in other code execution components
# Search for similar action files
fd -e mjs -e js --full-path '.*actions.*run-code.*' --exec rg -l 'type: "action"' {}
# Search for code execution patterns
rg -g '!node_modules' -A 5 'runCode|executeCode|eval.*code'1-1: Verify the imported module's interface
Let's ensure that the imported e2b.app.mjs module provides the required runCode method that's used in this action.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can generate the final response as we have found clear evidence that the e2b.app.mjs module does provide the required runCode method. The results show:
Import statement is correctly implemented
The imported module (e2b.app.mjs) contains the required runCode method that's used in this action. This is confirmed by:
- The method exists in
components/e2b/e2b.app.mjs - It's properly implemented to handle code execution via a sandbox
- The method signature matches the usage in
run-code.mjs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that e2b.app.mjs exports the runCode method
# Expected: Find the runCode method definition
ast-grep --pattern 'runCode($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5007
WHY
Resolves #14569
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores