Split SSI couple amount for OAP #5276
Conversation
| ssi = person("ssi", period) | ||
| total_countable_income = ssi + income | ||
| # The SSI variable assigns SSI to one member of the marital unit if both are eligible | ||
| marital_ssi = where(is_joint, person.marital_unit.sum(ssi) / 2, ssi) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| marital_ssi = where(is_joint, person.marital_unit.sum(ssi) / 2, ssi) | |
| marital_ssi = where(is_joint, person.household.sum(ssi) / 2, ssi) |
I think we want to sum it by household
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SSI is a per member benefit except for the marital unit. So, if the child qualifies for SSI, we would not want that to be counted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you add a source for this? AFAIUI, spouses could get different portions of the marital unit's total SSI, based on the personal income of each spouse; it's not automatically split 50/50.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My understanding is that if both spouses are eligible for SSI, they would only receive one check.
FYI, I just realized that I used the wrong variable. Just changed it to use ssi_marital_both_eligible
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you share a source on that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What part of that? This seems related but doesn't back this up AFAICT:
Deduct an amount to meet the needs of each dependent child living in the household of
the spouse equal to half the maximum SSI grant benefit standard
Could you please provide a full justification for this change in #5275? We prefer to document rationale in issues especially for nontrivial changes here. I'm not yet convinced so please include legal sources and pointers to our current code that needs correction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MaxGhenis Sorry for the delay on this; we had to do some more research. I was wrong about couples receiving one check. According to the handbook, couples receive separate checks. We also compiled some more detailed notes here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please justify the change in #5275
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5276 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.12% 99.00% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 2592 2612 +20
Lines 37707 38039 +332
Branches 162 166 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 37378 37662 +284
- Misses 297 344 +47
- Partials 32 33 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@MaxGhenis Can you review this pr? |
|
@PavelMakarchuk @MaxGhenis I realized that AND-CS (CO state supplement) has the same issue as OAP, so I added that change to this pr. |
@CalebPena could you adjust the |
fixes #5275