-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: small readability refactor to getActiveMatchingSurveys #1718
Merged
lucasheriques
merged 1 commit into
main
from
chore/small-refactor-to-get-active-matching-surveys
Feb 6, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
logic: This changes the behavior of internal targeting flags. Previously required flag check if no override, now passes if either condition is true. May cause surveys to show more frequently than intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is incorrect
in the first version, we had:
When
overrideInternalTargetingFlagCheck
is true:true
(second part of the ternary)true
(first part of OR condition)When
overrideInternalTargetingFlagCheck
is false (i.e. we callisSurveyFeatureFlagEnabled
):If
survey.internal_targeting_flag_key
isnull
:true
(second part of the ternary)true
(sinceisSurveyFeatureFlagEnabled
returns true)If
survey.internal_targeting_flag_key
is defined:isFeatureEnabled(survey.internal_targeting_flag_key)
isFeatureEnabled(survey.internal_targeting_flag_key)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we have unit tests for that so the change will break if not correct?
one thing to pay attention to is that the former uses
&&
and you use||
.the other thing is that your description says: 'When overrideInternalTargetingFlagCheck is
true
', but the former does '!
overrideInternalTargetingFlagCheck', so I'm not confident that it's the same without running the code, can you double check?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, there are unit tests for
getActiveMatchingSurveys
here, which is why I relied on them to keep the same functionality