You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a proposal to purchase a password management account for access and use by ProgCode Operations Staff and other community members in fulfillment of the ProgCode mission.
The password management account under consideration is a 1Password Teams membership account which is being offered to ProgCode with a 50% discount of the annual subscription price for life.
Problem
The ProgCode community relies on many services through accounts maintained by providers, all of which are accessed through logins and passwords. In the earliest days of our community, volunteers created these accounts and volunteered to be responsible for maintaining them for community access. As the community grew, this arrangement posed a potential security risk and risk of lost access, when login information was lost or persons holding the accounts were unavailable.
Benefit
A 1Password Teams account would decentralize control of accounts necessary for ProgCode community operations and enable account access to staff and other community members on an as-needed basis. The 1Password Teams account would secure and preserve the accounts for the benefit of present and future community members.
Expenditure Analysis
This proposed solution would require a minor monthly expenditure ($19.95/month x 50% = $9.98/month).
The requirements of Issues #198 and #236 are applicable, as follows:
Proposals seeking consent for implementation of budget requests and/or change process should not contradict ProgCode core objective and should pass this four-pronged test when considered by operations:
Is this proposal non-partisan in nature? Yes
Is this proposal aligned with ProgCode's mission of removing the influence of big money in politics? Yes
Does this proposal seek to empower the grassroots by supporting the creation of open source tech? Yes
Is this proposal sponsored or funded by an outside organization? If yes, the source of the funding must be disclosed. No
Plan
Community discussion of all elements of this proposal at the 10.25.2021 Community Operations Meeting.
Vote for consent to implement the standard change to purchase a month-to-month 1Password Teams account for access by ProgCode Staff and community members assisting the staff, on a need-for-access basis.
If the vote for consent to implement passes, purchase a month-to-month 1Password Teams account for the ProgCode Administration account in whatever capacity is approved in a community operations meeting.
Notify the community of the vote taken by posting a #team-announcement and sharing the video URL in #operations immediately following the 10.25.2021 Community Operations Meeting to allow additional votes & feedback during the standard 72-hour waiting period before ratifying the vote.
Initiate discussions to create and adopt protocols for the use of and access to the 1Password Teams account. The protocols should include, without limitation, the following purposes:
Maintain access to ProgCode resources by the community:
To prevent community member departures from causing a loss of access to ProgCode accounts by the greater ProgCode community
To facilitate delegation of access to 2factor-protected accounts that are becoming the norm
Secure ProgCode resources:
To discontinue the practice of sharing credentials over insecure channels
To make credential rotation easier in the event of account compromise
Identify the general purposes for which access to each account is needed, the related criteria for determining need, and the relevant period for which access is required.
Operations Staff and other community members will create a standard process for use, maintenance, and security of the ProgCode 1Password Teams account.
Keep this issue open for possible amendment at a later date, for continuing the account, increasing capacity at a later date, or cancelling the account.
Decision Making
Consent to implement a standard change per the Change Process
This gets a vote of confidence from a resident security advisor!
Passwords should 💯 be generated by and stored in a secure, purpose-built tool. 1Password is a proven, well-audited choice for this task.
stephenscapelliti
changed the title
DRAFT Standard Change - Purchase a ProgCode Password Management Account
Standard Change - Purchase a ProgCode Password Management Account
Oct 24, 2021
Description
This is a proposal to purchase a password management account for access and use by ProgCode Operations Staff and other community members in fulfillment of the ProgCode mission.
The password management account under consideration is a 1Password Teams membership account which is being offered to ProgCode with a 50% discount of the annual subscription price for life.
Problem
The ProgCode community relies on many services through accounts maintained by providers, all of which are accessed through logins and passwords. In the earliest days of our community, volunteers created these accounts and volunteered to be responsible for maintaining them for community access. As the community grew, this arrangement posed a potential security risk and risk of lost access, when login information was lost or persons holding the accounts were unavailable.
Benefit
A 1Password Teams account would decentralize control of accounts necessary for ProgCode community operations and enable account access to staff and other community members on an as-needed basis. The 1Password Teams account would secure and preserve the accounts for the benefit of present and future community members.
Expenditure Analysis
This proposed solution would require a minor monthly expenditure ($19.95/month x 50% = $9.98/month).
The requirements of Issues #198 and #236 are applicable, as follows:
Proposals seeking consent for implementation of budget requests and/or change process should not contradict ProgCode core objective and should pass this four-pronged test when considered by operations:
Plan
Decision Making
Consent to implement a standard change per the Change Process
Optional Information
Reference link(s)
Community Discussion History:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: