Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate basic chemicals into HVC, chlorine, methanol and ammonia #166
Separate basic chemicals into HVC, chlorine, methanol and ammonia #166
Changes from 2 commits
fbccd5f
93d4eae
c22cc08
561d86c
9f4e1f2
2f19814
fcc10aa
488b93a
8cf8a49
5c24742
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adds the energy use of mechanical recycling.
I have assumed energy demand for recycling of HPTE, PET, PS, PP as they are all very similar whereas LDPE is higher as well as more difficult to recycle.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good! Also for reference, another source doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.278 with somewhat lower energy demand around 0.3 MWh/tPlastic. We can take the newer higher number.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we also check that the numbers from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105010 are consistent with our chemical recycling assumptions? @brynpickering warned about reliability of Material Economics numbers in a private email.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The paper describes for routes of chemical recycling:
Route 3) comes closes to the Material Economics study (which uses pyrolysis and electric steam cracking and methanol synthesis to produce HVC from HVC for which they need 6.9 kWh/kg electricity with a yield of 0.91 kg/kg).
Route 3) in the paper following table S10 in the SI requires 3 MJ/kg (0.78 kWh/kg) of heat to turn HDPE into ethylene with a yield of 0.85 kg_ethylene / kg.
Not sure how conclusive this comparison is. Seems Material Economics numbers are a bit high?
*polyolefins: LDPE, HDPE, PP
*HVC: ethylene, propylene, polyolefins etc.