Skip to content

Conversation

kt474
Copy link
Member

@kt474 kt474 commented Jul 2, 2025

Summary

Draft PR for now, still need to test which options actually work. Currently more of a POC to show that we don't need the RuntimeOptions class anymore and it's confusing to have this extra "options" class.

Details and comments

Fixes #2300

@ElePT ElePT added the Changelog: Removal Include in the Removed section of the changelog label Jul 16, 2025
@ElePT ElePT added this to the 0.41.0 milestone Jul 16, 2025
@kt474 kt474 removed this from the 0.41.0 milestone Jul 23, 2025
@kt474 kt474 marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 17:50
Copy link
Collaborator

@ElePT ElePT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another deprecation slip-up from the runtime programs era. This should have been deprecated when it stopped being useful server-side. At this point, I again see this cleanup as a bugfix rather than a new deprecation, given that the functionality stopped working a long time ago. I am fine with the removal, I would just point out the release note to document it.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ElePT ElePT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have found a downstream package that depended on RuntimeOptions. Given that we are in no rush to remove the class, I suggest turning this PR into a deprecation PR instead of a removal. I would keep the typehint changes though, they reflect the current status better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Changelog: Removal Include in the Removed section of the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cleanup RuntimeOptions
2 participants