Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BLOG] Add accessibility-whos-responsible #519

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MarsBarLee
Copy link
Contributor

@MarsBarLee MarsBarLee commented Oct 19, 2022

Link to blog post, successful build.

Links to other Quansight blogs:

There is no need to check for Blog2Blog links due to updated website build.

Text styling

  • The blog is written with plain language (where relevant).
  • If there are headers, they use the proper header tags in order to do so (with only one level-one header).
  • All links describe where they link to (for example, check the Quansight labs website).
  • Any kind of styling that the author uses (for example, bold for emphasis) is consistent throughout the blog.

Non-text contents

  • All content is represented as text (for example, images need alt text and videos need captions or descriptive transcripts).
  • If there are emojis, there are not more than three in a row.
  • Don't use flashing gifs or videos.
  • If it were to be read as plain text, the blog still makes sense and no information is missing.

@MarsBarLee MarsBarLee added labs 🔭 Items related to the Labs website type: content 📝 labels Oct 19, 2022
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 19, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
consulting ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 19, 2022 at 7:01PM (UTC)
labs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 19, 2022 at 7:01PM (UTC)

the four experience types in JupyterLab that we must address to be truly accessible.
___

*This is part of a series of blogs around making JupyterLab more accessible. You can read the
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
*This is part of a series of blogs around making JupyterLab more accessible. You can read the

___

*This is part of a series of blogs around making JupyterLab more accessible. You can read the
[whole series here](/categories/jlaba11y).*
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[whole series here](/categories/jlaba11y).*

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest we remove this, since the new blog doesn't have a page for this series. We can filter by category. WDYT @isabela-pf? Do you prefer to rephrase this and replace it with a link to the whole category: https://labs.quansight.org/blog?category=Access-centered&page=1, or remove this entirely?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should wait on this because the category link might get refactored soon. See #396 (comment) for more details about the upcoming changes.

@MarsBarLee
Copy link
Contributor Author

MarsBarLee commented Mar 22, 2023

Noa mentioned putting this PR on hold until it's decided how to handle category links.

Since it’s been a few months and the category links change has not been implemented yet, I think we could replace the link with Noa’s suggestion (https://labs.quansight.org/blog?category=Access-centered&page=1) and merge for now. The Access-Centered tag isn't the same as the jlaba11y but it works as an umbrella tag.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
labs 🔭 Items related to the Labs website type: content 📝
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants