docs: add blog of evaluation about OCR

RapidAI · Dec 8, 2024 · a06e36e · a06e36e
1 parent 1f7bd2b
commit a06e36e
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 13 changed files with 59 additions and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103523542 b/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103523542
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103536368 b/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103536368
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103541160 b/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103541160
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103546381 b/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103546381
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103550187 b/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103550187
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103554131 b/docs/blog/posts/images/640-20241208103554131
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103232900.png b/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103232900.png
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103310417.png b/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103310417.png
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103329977.png b/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103329977.png
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103344517.png b/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103344517.png
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103400365.png b/docs/blog/posts/images/image-20241208103400365.png
diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/ocr_evaluation.md b/docs/blog/posts/ocr_evaluation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+---
+title: 广州软件院开箱测评12款开源OCR，RapidOCR表现优异
+date:
+  created: 2024-12-08
+authors: [SWHL]
+slug: guangzhou-software-institute-reviews-12-open-source-ocr-tools-rapidocr-stands-out
+categories:
+  - General
+comments: true
+typora-copy-images-to:images
+---
+
+RapidOCR在12款开源OCR中表现优异
+
+<!-- more -->
+
+前几天，Joker告诉我看到一篇OCR测评的文章，并说咱家RapidOCR整体表现很不错。我特地去看了一下，发现是广州软件院发起的OCR测评，算是一个比较公允的测评方了。这篇文章是今年6月份写的，也不算太老，还是有一点参考意义的。
+
+RapidOCR在12款开源OCR中也算得上可圈可点了。完整的测评报告，请移步 [AI测评 | 十二款开源OCR开箱测评，文字识别哪家强](https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA5MjU2NjYxNQ==&mid=2449494038&idx=1&sn=f144be7182839e22a421e0df9e9609f0&scene=21#wechat_redirect) 获取。因为测评的文章没有开启原创，不能转载，因此就在这里给出了链接，在此感谢广州软件院的测评工作，为大家选择合适的OCR模型提供了参考。
+
+⚠️注意：下面的图文均是摘自[AI测评 | 十二款开源OCR开箱测评，文字识别哪家强](https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA5MjU2NjYxNQ==&mid=2449494038&idx=1&sn=f144be7182839e22a421e0df9e9609f0&scene=21#wechat_redirect) 中，如有侵权，请告知我删除。
+
+我在这里只放一些关键的测评结论：
+ (1)印刷中文的综合测评结果为：
+
+![image-20241208103232900](./images/image-20241208103232900.png)
+
+（2）印刷英文的综合测评结果为：
+
+![image-20241208103310417](./images/image-20241208103310417.png)
+
+（3）变形字体的艺术字测评结果为：
+
+![image-20241208103329977](./images/image-20241208103329977.png)
+
+（4）自然场景的街景图片测评结果为：
+
+![image-20241208103344517](./images/image-20241208103344517.png)
+
+（5）手写中文的综合测评结果为：
+
+![image-20241208103400365](./images/image-20241208103400365.png)
+
+测评总结：
+
+![图片](./images/640-20241208103523542)
+
+**RapidOCR虽然基于PaddleOCR，但做了⼀定预处理和参数优化，因此在⾓度旋转180度和低对⽐度两个数据集中拉开了与PaddleOCR的差距；并且基于onnx推理格式的版本，在识别的速度上也较PaddleOCR有明显提升。**各个⼯具在中⽂印刷⽂字正常扫描、拍照图⽚中识别的准确度都很⾼。其中，扫描⽂档数据集，前三名的綜合评分都在99%以上，照⽚⽂档数据集中，前三名的综合评分都在98%以上。
+
+![图片](./images/640-20241208103536368)
+
+![图片](./images/640-20241208103541160)
+
+![图片](./images/640-20241208103546381)
+
+![图片](./images/640-20241208103550187)
+
+![图片](./images/640-20241208103554131)
diff --git a/overrides/main.html b/overrides/main.html
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {% extends "base.html" %}
 
 {% block announce %}
-    <p>🎉 RapidOCR获得2024中国互联网发展创新与投资大赛（开源）二等奖 → <a href="https://rapidai.github.io/RapidOCRDocs/blog/2024/09/03/2024-bjos" target="_blank">link</a></p>
+    <p>🎉 广州软件院开箱测评12款开源OCR，RapidOCR表现优异 → <a href="https://rapidai.github.io/RapidOCRDocs/blog/2024/12/08/guangzhou-software-institute-reviews-12-open-source-ocr-tools-rapidocr-stands-out" target="_blank">link</a></p>
 {% endblock %}