docs: updates tool for ADR management to trestle

[jpower432]

Description

Keeps the original intent of ADR management and updates solution to use trestle to manage the custom ADR template.

Fixes #314

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested?

• Validated locally

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[gvauter]

LGTM, one thought on the status field.

[jpower432]

LGTM, one thought on the status field.

@gvauter Not seeing a comment pertaining to the status field.

[gvauter]

LGTM, one thought on the status field.

@gvauter Not seeing a comment pertaining to the status field.

@jpower432 Apologies - my comment was around the potential desire for a "proposed" status, similar to what is mentioned here. I believe all the current status values apply after a decision has been made, but do we want a status to represent ADRs that are under review/discussion?

[jpower432]

@jpower432 Apologies - my comment was around the potential desire for a "proposed" status, similar to what is mentioned here. I believe all the current status values apply after a decision has been made, but do we want a status to represent ADRs that are under review/discussion?

Good catch. I think an ADR that has been submitted via the PR process could have a proposed status. I will add that to the comment.

[gvauter]

LGTM