Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to new fork #40

Closed
wants to merge 31 commits into from
Closed

Update to new fork #40

wants to merge 31 commits into from

Conversation

fulldecent
Copy link

Please help work with this PR to bring your contributions to chart.js to the latest support "canonical" fork of the project.

As you may know, nnnick from chart.js has disappeared and there are many people still working on the project with their PRs and issues to nnnick being ignored.

Please help by carefully and manually merging your fork with the fulldecent/chart.js MASTER branch. At this time we are hoping to collect incremental work (not rewrites) into the fulldecent/chart.js MASTER branch and continue discussion at that project about how to move forward. Progress so far is:

  • Travis CI set up and first unit test passing
  • Realistic and achievable Project Goal is defined
  • Added animated screen shots to readme.md

And there is more discussion on the new fork at chartjs#356

nnnick and others added 30 commits April 15, 2013 10:20
default scaleShowLabels value for Line and Bar is true in js file, but
it is false in document page.
Correct document page to match the value to reduce the confuse
Correct default scaleShowLabels value in document
Challenge post are running a competition and offering some great
prizes. Details are in the readme.
spelling changed for competition
Keeps Chart as a global when included inside wrapper IIFE
Using a framework that joins several js files, will cause errors, since this file isn't properly closed
The config.datasetStroke option for Line and Radar charts was being
ignored, I fixed that and also cached datasetStrokeWidth to a local
variable before entering the foor loop as the value won't change inside
the loop.
@Regaddi
Copy link
Owner

Regaddi commented May 24, 2014

Thanks for your interest in my fork. As I already mentioned in nnnick#356, I'm not going to effectively push any new code fragments to the old core. I'll wait for nnnicks big refactor :)

@Regaddi Regaddi closed this May 24, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants