Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: upgrade to new RN SDK version #88

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

rodrigopavezi
Copy link
Member

@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi commented Dec 13, 2024

Problem

There were some issue with the first version of the lit protocol provider from RN SDK

Changes

Upgrade to new version of the RN SDK lit protocol provider

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced LitProvider component for improved protocol initialization.
    • Added DynamicLitProvider for conditional rendering based on connection status.
  • Updates

    • Updated multiple dependencies to enhance functionality and compatibility.
    • Modified build process to utilize Node.js version 22 and optimize memory usage.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed unnecessary properties from the InvoiceDashboardProps interface, streamlining the component's props.
  • Chores

    • Updated workflow configuration for build optimizations.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rodrigopavezi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 511d864 and f2bd820.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (2 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several updates to the project's dependency management and architecture. The changes primarily focus on updating package versions, adding new Lit Protocol-related dependencies, and modifying the context and provider setup for decryption functionality. The modifications span across multiple files, including package.json, pages/index.tsx, types.d.ts, utils/context.tsx, utils/litProvider.tsx, and .github/workflows/build.yml, with an emphasis on improving the project's dependency management and client-side integration.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json - Added @lit-protocol/constants and @lit-protocol/lit-node-client (v7.0.2)
- Updated multiple @requestnetwork/* package versions
- Updated next and @next/third-parties to v15.1.0
- Added @lit-protocol/types as a dev dependency
pages/index.tsx - Removed isDecryptionEnabled and enableDecryption from context destructuring
types.d.ts - Removed isDecryptionEnabled and enableDecryption from InvoiceDashboardProps interface
utils/context.tsx - Added dynamic import of LitProvider
- Modified initializeRequestNetwork function signature
- Updated context initialization logic
utils/litProvider.tsx - Added new LitProvider component
- Implemented Lit protocol client initialization
.github/workflows/build.yml - Updated Node.js version from 18 to 22
- Added container specification
- Enhanced build configuration with additional environment variables

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant App as Application
    participant Context as AppContext
    participant LitProvider as Dynamic Lit Provider
    participant LitClient as Lit Node Client
    participant CipherProvider as Lit Protocol Cipher Provider

    App->>Context: Initialize Context
    Context->>LitProvider: Dynamically Import
    LitProvider->>LitClient: Initialize Client
    LitClient-->>LitProvider: Client Ready
    LitProvider->>CipherProvider: Create Provider
    CipherProvider-->>LitProvider: Provider Ready
    LitProvider->>Context: Trigger onProviderReady Callback
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • MantisClone
  • aimensahnoun
  • sstefdev

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
utils/litProvider.tsx (2)

28-31: Enhance error handling and logging

The error handling could be more informative for debugging purposes. Consider adding error details and implementing proper error tracking.

     } catch (error) {
-      console.error('Failed to initialize Cipher Provider:', error);
+      console.error('Failed to initialize Cipher Provider:', {
+        error,
+        network: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK,
+        baseURL: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_REQUEST_NODE
+      });
       onProviderReady(undefined);
     }

15-16: Document environment variable defaults

The code uses environment variables with fallback values. These should be documented for proper configuration management.

Consider adding a comment block explaining the environment variables and their defaults:

/**
 * Environment Variables:
 * - NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK: The Lit Protocol network to connect to (defaults to 'datil')
 * - NEXT_PUBLIC_REQUEST_NODE: Base URL for the Request Network node (defaults to 'https://gnosis.gateway.request.network/')
 */

Also applies to: 20-23

utils/context.tsx (2)

62-65: Type safety improvement needed.

Consider using a more specific type for the wallet parameter instead of unknown to ensure type safety.

-const initializeRequestNetwork = (wallet: unknown) => {
+const initializeRequestNetwork = (wallet: WalletClient) => {

Line range hint 71-156: Refactor suggestion: Simplify chain-specific URL configuration.

The nested ternary operators make the code hard to maintain. Consider refactoring to a more maintainable structure.

+const CHAIN_SUBGRAPH_URLS: Record<string, string> = {
+  'arbitrum-one': process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_PAYMENTS_SUBGRAPH_URL_ARBITRUM_ONE || 
+    'https://subgraph.satsuma-prod.com/e2e4905ab7c8/request-network--434873/request-payments-arbitrum-one/api',
+  'avalanche': process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_PAYMENTS_SUBGRAPH_URL_AVALANCHE ||
+    'https://subgraph.satsuma-prod.com/e2e4905ab7c8/request-network--434873/request-payments-avalanche/api',
+  // ... other chains
+};
+
 const paymentsSubgraphUrl = CHAIN_SUBGRAPH_URLS[chain];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e233276 and 295d6b4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • pages/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • types.d.ts (0 hunks)
  • utils/context.tsx (4 hunks)
  • utils/litProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • types.d.ts
🔇 Additional comments (9)
pages/index.tsx (1)

15-15: LGTM! Clean interface simplification

The removal of decryption-related props from context destructuring aligns well with the upgraded lit protocol provider implementation. The change reduces component complexity while maintaining necessary functionality.

package.json (3)

12-13: LGTM! Well-pinned lit-protocol dependencies

The lit-protocol dependencies are correctly pinned to specific versions, which helps ensure consistent behavior across environments.

Also applies to: 38-38


17-22: LGTM! Properly versioned @RequestNetwork packages

The @RequestNetwork package updates are appropriately pinned and follow a consistent versioning pattern.


14-16: Consider pinning remaining dependencies

Several dependencies still use the caret (^) version range, which could lead to unexpected updates. Consider pinning these versions for better reproducibility.

Also applies to: 23-35

utils/context.tsx (5)

64-65: LGTM: Web3SignatureProvider initialization.

The Web3SignatureProvider initialization looks correct with proper error handling.


227-233: LGTM: Clean provider initialization pattern.

The conditional rendering and callback-based provider initialization is well implemented. The dependency chain (walletClient, isConnected, address, chainId) ensures proper initialization order.


13-18: LGTM: Dynamic import setup is appropriate.

The dynamic import with ssr: false is the correct approach for loading the Lit Protocol provider, as it requires browser APIs.

Let's verify the LitProvider implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Dynamic import setup is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that LitProvider is properly exported as a function component from utils/litProvider.tsx, making it compatible with the dynamic import setup in context.tsx. The implementation follows React best practices for client-side only components.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if LitProvider is properly exported from litProvider
rg -t typescript "export.*LitProvider" ./utils/litProvider.tsx

Length of output: 99


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to verify the LitProvider implementation

# First, check if the file exists
fd "litProvider"

# Then check for exports without specifying file type
rg "export.*LitProvider"

# Also check for any React component definition patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'const LitProvider = $_'

Length of output: 202


Line range hint 241-247: LGTM: Context hook follows best practices.

The useAppContext hook implementation is correct with proper error handling.

Let's verify the context usage across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Context hook implementation and usage verified successfully

The verification confirms that:

  • The context hook is properly implemented in utils/context.tsx with createContext and error handling
  • The hook is correctly used across multiple components:
    • pages/index.tsx
    • pages/create-invoice.tsx
    • components/common/Navbar.tsx
  • All usages follow the pattern of destructuring specific values from the context
  • No instances of improper usage outside the provider were found
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper context usage
rg "useAppContext|Context.Provider" -t typescript

Length of output: 86


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for proper context usage with common TypeScript/JavaScript extensions
rg "useAppContext|Context.Provider" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"

# Also search for any Context-related imports and definitions
rg "createContext|useContext" -g "*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"

Length of output: 1000


209-210: Verify potential race condition in useEffect dependencies.

The useEffect dependency on isDecryptionEnabled might cause unnecessary re-initialization. Consider splitting the effects or using a ref to track initial state.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
utils/litProvider.tsx (2)

17-17: Validate NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK before casting

Casting process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK to LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS without validation may result in invalid values if the environment variable is incorrectly set. Consider validating the environment variable to ensure it matches one of the allowed LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS.

Apply this diff to add validation:

          const litNetworkEnv = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK;
-         litNetwork: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS || LIT_NETWORK.Datil,
+         litNetwork: Object.values(LIT_NETWORK).includes(litNetworkEnv as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS)
+           ? (litNetworkEnv as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS)
+           : LIT_NETWORK.Datil,

32-33: Enhance error logging for easier debugging

Consider providing more detailed error information when initialization fails. This could include additional context or the specific parameters used, which can be helpful for troubleshooting.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 295d6b4 and a1a6713.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • utils/litProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
utils/litProvider.tsx (2)

23-24: Confirm the default baseURL

The default baseURL is set to 'https://gnosis.gateway.request.network/'. Ensure this is the intended default URL for the Request Network node. If not, consider updating it or externalizing it to a configuration file or environment variable.


40-42: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add cleanup for litNodeClient to prevent memory leaks

The cleanup function in useEffect should disconnect the litNodeClient to prevent memory leaks and ensure proper resource management. Currently, only litProviderRef.current?.disconnectClient?.(); is called. Consider storing a reference to litNodeClient and disconnecting it on unmount.

Apply this diff to include cleanup for litNodeClient:

    import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react';

+   const litNodeClientRef = useRef<LitNodeClient | null>(null);

    const initializeLit = async () => {
      try {
        const litNodeClient = new LitNodeClient({
          litNetwork: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_LIT_PROTOCOL_NETWORK as LIT_NETWORKS_KEYS || LIT_NETWORK.Datil,
        });
+       litNodeClientRef.current = litNodeClient;
        const litCipherProvider = new LitProtocolCipherProvider(
          litNodeClient,
          {
            baseURL:
              process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_REQUEST_NODE ||
              'https://gnosis.gateway.request.network/',
            headers: {}
          },
        );
-       litCipherProvider.initializeClient();
+       await litCipherProvider.initializeClient();
        litProviderRef.current = litCipherProvider;
        onProviderReady(litCipherProvider);
      } catch (error) {
        console.error('Failed to initialize Cipher Provider:', error);
        onProviderReady(undefined);
      }
    };

    // Initialize on mount
    useEffect(() => {
      initializeLit();
      return () => {
+       litNodeClientRef.current?.disconnect?.();
        litProviderRef.current?.disconnectClient?.();
      };
    }, []);

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/build.yml (2)

38-40: Consider optimizing npm installation flags

While the changes improve reliability, there are some concerns:

  1. Forcing cache clean on every run might increase build times unnecessarily
  2. --maxsockets 1 could significantly slow down package downloads

Consider this alternative approach:

-  npm cache clean --force
-  npm ci --prefer-offline --no-audit --maxsockets 1
+  npm ci --prefer-offline --no-audit

Only clean cache when there are actual cache-related issues.


43-55: Well-configured build optimization settings

The build configuration changes are well thought out:

  • Clearing .next prevents stale cache issues
  • Memory settings are appropriate for large Next.js builds
  • Environment variables are properly configured for production builds

Consider monitoring the memory usage during builds to fine-tune the max-old-space-size value. The current 8GB setting might be more than needed, or in some cases, insufficient depending on the project size.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a1a6713 and 94c1330.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • next.config.js (1 hunks)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • utils/litProvider.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • utils/litProvider.tsx
  • package.json
🔇 Additional comments (4)
next.config.js (2)

1-8: LGTM! Well-structured configuration

The configuration is well-structured and properly typed with TypeScript. The module exports follow the standard Next.js configuration pattern.


3-5: Caution: Using experimental Next.js features

The optimizePackageImports is an experimental Next.js feature that may change or be removed in future releases. While it can improve performance by automatically handling package imports more efficiently, be prepared to update this configuration in future Next.js upgrades.

Let's verify the package versions and their compatibility:

✅ Verification successful

The previous output confirmed the packages are installed, but let's verify their actual usage and Next.js version compatibility. I've corrected the ripgrep file type flags to properly include TypeScript and TSX files.


Let's verify the actual usage of these packages and confirm if this experimental feature is officially supported in Next.js 15.1.0. I've corrected the file pattern matching approach for ripgrep.


Experimental feature usage is appropriate and packages are actively used

The configuration is valid as:

  • Both packages are properly installed (@lit-protocol/[email protected] and @requestnetwork/[email protected])
  • The packages are actively used in the codebase (found in utils/litProvider.tsx)
  • The optimizePackageImports feature is officially supported in Next.js 15.1.0 as an experimental option
  • This optimization can help improve the application's performance by better handling these specific package imports
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify package versions in package.json and their compatibility
# with the optimizePackageImports feature

# Check if packages are listed in dependencies
jq -r '.dependencies | select(.["@lit-protocol/lit-node-client"] != null or .["@requestnetwork/lit-protocol-cipher"] != null)' package.json

# Search for any import statements of these packages to ensure they're actually used
rg -l '@lit-protocol/lit-node-client|@requestnetwork/lit-protocol-cipher' --type js --type tsx --type ts

Length of output: 1115


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports with correct file type flags
rg -l '@lit-protocol/lit-node-client|@requestnetwork/lit-protocol-cipher' -t js -t typescript -t tsx

# Check if Next.js version supports this experimental feature
jq -r '.dependencies.next' package.json

Length of output: 185


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for imports using individual file extensions
rg -l '@lit-protocol/lit-node-client|@requestnetwork/lit-protocol-cipher' -g '*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}'

# Check if this experimental feature is documented in the Next.js version's release notes
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vercel/next.js/v15.1.0/packages/next/src/server/config-schema.ts" | grep -A 5 "optimizePackageImports"

Length of output: 606

.github/workflows/build.yml (2)

30-36: Great addition of system diagnostics!

Adding system information logging is excellent for CI/CD observability and will help debug potential resource-related build failures.


27-27: Verify dependency compatibility with Node.js 20

The upgrade to Node.js 20 is a good move as it's the latest LTS version. However, we should verify compatibility with all dependencies, especially the new RN SDK version.

✅ Verification successful

Node.js 20 upgrade is compatible with all dependencies

All dependencies are compatible with Node.js 20:

  • Most critical dependency next.js explicitly supports Node.js 20 (>= 20.0.0)
  • Request Network packages require Node.js >=18.0.0
  • Other dependencies have lower version requirements (>=14.0.0, >=12.4, >=6, etc.)
  • No dependency has an upper bound that would conflict with Node.js 20
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check package.json for potential Node.js version requirements or conflicts

# Check for explicit Node.js version requirements in package.json
echo "Checking package.json for Node.js version requirements..."
jq '.engines?.node' package.json

# Check dependencies that might have Node.js version constraints
echo "Checking dependencies for Node.js version constraints..."
for pkg in $(jq -r '.dependencies | keys[]' package.json); do
  npm info $pkg engines.node
done

Length of output: 2924

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/build.yml (3)

37-39: Consider adding memory monitoring during build

The addition of ulimit -c unlimited suggests there might be memory-related issues during the build. While this allows for core dumps, it would be better to monitor memory usage to prevent issues.

Consider adding memory monitoring before and after the build:

  run: |  
+   free -h
    ulimit -c unlimited  
    npm run build
+   free -h
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 37-37: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 38-38: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


37-38: Fix trailing whitespace

There are trailing spaces at the end of these lines.

Apply this diff to fix the formatting:

-        run: |  
-          ulimit -c unlimited  
+        run: |
+          ulimit -c unlimited
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 37-37: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 38-38: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


20-22: Consider adding health check for container memory limits

While setting a 4GB memory limit is good, it would be beneficial to verify this limit is sufficient throughout the build process.

Consider adding a memory monitoring step or implementing a pre-build check to ensure the container has the required resources. This could help catch potential issues early in the build process.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e37212 and b3df132.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/build.yml

[error] 37-37: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 38-38: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/build.yml (1)

42-45: LGTM! Optimized build configuration

The added environment variables are well-thought-out:

  • NODE_OPTIONS: Increases heap size and enables garbage collection
  • NEXT_TELEMETRY_DISABLED: Disables telemetry for privacy
  • NPM_CONFIG_PRODUCTION: Ensures dev dependencies are installed
  • NODE_ENV: Sets production mode for optimized builds

@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi merged commit 96ccf2a into main Dec 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@rodrigopavezi rodrigopavezi deleted the feat/lit-encryption-new-sdk-version branch December 14, 2024 12:56
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants