Web sdk customers identity #564
Conversation
|
Preview this PR here: https://dev-docs.revenuecat.com/pr-564/ |
docs/web/revenuecat-billing.mdx
Outdated
| ## Identifying customers | ||
| ## Identifying Customers | ||
|
|
||
| The RevenueCat Web SDK supports both [identified](/customers/user-ids) and [non-identified (anonymous)](/customers/user-ids#anonymous-app-user-ids) customers, offering flexibility in how you manage user accounts and subscriptions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we add some code sample on how to initialize the SDK anonymously?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, makes sense. Adding them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch, I guess we should update this section right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added 2 examples, repeating the one on top for identified customers, and added a new one for the anonymous.
I think it's fine since we have the Identifying Customers right after the Configuring the SDK.
It would be confusing to first give both examples and then explain the differences.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could also reverse the order of the sections, starting with Identifying customers followed by SDK configuration with both examples, wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I added a line to "connect" the 2 sections, let me know if it makes more sense like this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I personally prefer to avoid snippet duplication and just reverse the order of these two sections. Another benefit is that all SDK sections appear sequentially, but it’s not a blocker either.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@MrEdwardo we need a tie breaker 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@nicfix I think I'm okay with the snippet duplication in this case, to clearly separate the different cases
Motivation / Description
Updated the Identifying Customers section to reflect the changes made with the redemption links