New finals #928
New finals #928
Conversation
LeroyR
force-pushed
the
egpsr_finals
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b541012 to
34c0608
Compare
|
@LeroyR, ec and tc decided on egpsr as finals so can be real PR instant of draft now/ |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
| \scoreitem[3]{150}{Find and clearly state an encountered problem} | ||
| \scoreitem[3]{650}{Solve a problem} | ||
|
|
||
| \scoreheading{Deus Ex Machina Penalties} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For final demonstrations I would consider removing Deus Ex Machina...
I expect the teams who make it to be prepared to complete the entire task.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One of the stated goal for this new final (from EC) was "to keep the robots moving during the task regardless"
Deus Ex is an escape hatch to ensure something continues to happen.
In the old final, to ensure something happens, we allowed teams to do whatever is necessary so they can show of. (touch robot, restart, reprogram the final on the spot e.g. tidyboy 23)
Disallowing deus ex is imho the exact opposite - but i agree that we should expect them to be prepared 😓
We just have to aware of this.
|
Idea: The robot solves the task as usual (autonomously from the start signal) AND the team explains (with some slides?) what's happening and how they have solved the problem. We can average the points scored in the task with some scoring from the invited jury evaluating the presentation and robot performance from their point of view (the last time we invited some sponsors). |
Not having any presentation or custom jury evaluation was decided by the EC. |
|
so it's EGPSR now. Sounds good. We should probably have slightly different problems for the robot to solve though than in the "normal" EGPSR, simply so that the tasks are not just replicated one to one. But that would be up to the Referees to set up at the competition, depending on prior EGPSR performances. |
|
|
||
| \begin{enumerate}[nosep] | ||
| \item \textbf{Closing Furniture:} Doors of the Cabinet as well as the Dishwasher need to be closed. | ||
| \item \textbf{Welcome Guest:} There is an additional Person waiting behind the Exit door. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
wasn't this supposed to be the entrance door?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should be whatever door the robot is not entering from as the next team prepares there.
Description
EC Decision: Change the Final to be Task instead of open demonstration based.
The idea is to have the best two teams showing off the best performance of the league to the general audience; also, there are other places to show their research (poster session, open challenge, robocup symposium, winning-team paper, icra/iros workshops, and so on), and we are not able to objectively evaluate the relevance of their research in 10 minutes of an open demonstration.
Other Leagues just repeat whatever they do before (e.g. soccer just plays soccer) or do "Medleys" of previous Tasks for the final. EGPSR (with some changes?) would be a better fit for the finals than an open demonstration with presentation.
Closes issue #899
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Other comments
\label{chap:setup_and_preparation}This is just to get the pull request started and have this intended change visible for teams.