Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Macro syn rewrite #1073

Draft
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: rust-next
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

y86-dev
Copy link
Member

@y86-dev y86-dev commented Apr 9, 2024

No description provided.

@y86-dev y86-dev force-pushed the macro-syn-rewrite branch 2 times, most recently from bc10cb7 to 3b8d505 Compare April 9, 2024 16:03
ojeda and others added 22 commits April 10, 2024 09:05
Host programs should be (and currently are) warning-free. Apply
`CONFIG_WERROR` (i.e. `-Dwarnings`) to them as well, so that they are
kept that way.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
Proc macros run in the host, so apply those flags for them instead of
just the common ones.

In practice, this currently adds:

    -O -Cstrip=debuginfo -Zallow-features=

and, if enabled, `-Dwarnings` too (i.e. `CONFIG_WERROR`) -- the `macros`
crate should be (and currently is) warning-free, so applying this to it
ensures it is kept that way.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
There are two kinds of configuration options (`cfg`s): names and
key-value pairs. So far, we only needed to support the former for the
`rust-analyzer` target.

Since we are introducing `syn` (and its dependencies) in later patches,
which require passing `feature` `cfg`s, support key-value `cfg`s too in
the `rust-analyzer` target.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
This is a subset of the Rust `proc-macro2` crate,
version 1.0.79, licensed under "Apache-2.0 OR MIT", from:

    https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/raw/1.0.79/src

The files are copied as-is, with no modifications whatsoever
(not even adding the SPDX identifiers).

For copyright details, please see:

    https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/blob/1.0.79/README.md#license
    https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/blob/1.0.79/LICENSE-APACHE
    https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/blob/1.0.79/LICENSE-MIT

The next two patches modify these files as needed for use within
the kernel. This patch split allows reviewers to double-check
the import and to clearly see the differences introduced.

The following script may be used to verify the contents:

    for path in $(cd rust/proc-macro2/ && find . -type f -name '*.rs'); do
        curl --silent --show-error --location \
            https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/raw/1.0.79/src/$path \
            | diff --unified rust/proc-macro2/$path - && echo $path: OK
    done

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
The `proc-macro2` crate depends on the `unicode-ident` crate
to determine whether characters have the XID_Start or XID_Continue
properties according to Unicode Standard Annex Rust-for-Linux#31.

However, we only need ASCII identifiers in the kernel, thus we can
simplify the check and remove completely that dependency.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
This is a subset of the Rust `quote` crate,
version 1.0.35, licensed under "Apache-2.0 OR MIT", from:

    https://github.com/dtolnay/quote/raw/1.0.35/src

The files are copied as-is, with no modifications whatsoever
(not even adding the SPDX identifiers).

For copyright details, please see:

    https://github.com/dtolnay/quote/blob/1.0.35/README.md#license
    https://github.com/dtolnay/quote/blob/1.0.35/LICENSE-APACHE
    https://github.com/dtolnay/quote/blob/1.0.35/LICENSE-MIT

The next patch modifies these files as needed for use within
the kernel. This patch split allows reviewers to double-check
the import and to clearly see the differences introduced.

The following script may be used to verify the contents:

    for path in $(cd rust/quote/ && find . -type f -name '*.rs'); do
        curl --silent --show-error --location \
            https://github.com/dtolnay/quote/raw/1.0.35/src/$path \
            | diff --unified rust/quote/$path - && echo $path: OK
    done

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
This is a subset of the Rust `syn` crate,
version 2.0.58, licensed under "Apache-2.0 OR MIT", from:

    https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/raw/2.0.58/src

The files are copied as-is, with no modifications whatsoever
(not even adding the SPDX identifiers).

For copyright details, please see:

    https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/blob/2.0.58/README.md#license
    https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/blob/2.0.58/LICENSE-APACHE
    https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/blob/2.0.58/LICENSE-MIT

The next two patches modify these files as needed for use within
the kernel. This patch split allows reviewers to double-check
the import and to clearly see the differences introduced.

The following script may be used to verify the contents:

    for path in $(cd rust/syn/ && find . -type f -name '*.rs'); do
        curl --silent --show-error --location \
            https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/raw/2.0.58/src/$path \
            | diff --unified rust/syn/$path - && echo $path: OK
    done

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
The `syn` crate depends on the `unicode-ident` crate
to determine whether characters have the XID_Start or XID_Continue
properties according to Unicode Standard Annex Rust-for-Linux#31.

However, we only need ASCII identifiers in the kernel, thus we can
simplify the check and remove completely that dependency.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
With all the new files in place from the new crates, this patch
adds support for them in the build system so that the kernel's
`macros` crate can use all their facilities.

In particular, the `syn` crate is fully enabled, i.e. all its
optional dependencies are enabled.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
The `module!` macro creates glue code that are called by C to initialize
the Rust modules using the `Module::init` function. Part of this glue
code are the local functions `__init` and `__exit` that are used to
initialize/destroy the Rust module.

These functions are safe and also visible to the Rust mod in which the
`module!` macro is invoked. This means that they can be called by other
safe Rust code. But since they contain `unsafe` blocks that rely on only
being called at the right time, this is a soundness issue.

Wrap these generated functions inside of two private modules, this
guarantees that the public functions cannot be called from the outside.
Make the safe functions `unsafe` and add SAFETY comments.

Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Björn Roy Baron <[email protected]>
Closes: Rust-for-Linux#629
Fixes: 1fbde52 ("rust: add `macros` crate")
Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Wedson Almeida Filho <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ Capitalized comments, avoided newline in non-list SAFETY comments
  and reworded to add Reported-by and newline. ]
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>
We now have access to the `quote` crate providing the `quote!` macro
that does the same (and more) as our own `quote!` macro. Thus replace
our own version with the one from the crate.
Since the `quote` crate uses the `proc-macro2` library, we also use that
in our macros instead of `proc-macro`.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Now that `syn` and `quote` are available in the Kernel use them for the
`#[vtable]` proc-macro attribute instead of the current string based
proc-macro approach.

Proc-macros written using `syn` are a lot more readable and thus easier
to maintain than proc-macros written using string manipulation. An
additional advantage of `syn` is the improved error reporting, here is
an example:

    #[vtable]
    const _: () = ();

Prior to this patch, the error reads:

    error: custom attribute panicked
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:40:1
       |
    40 | #[vtable]
       | ^^^^^^^^^
       |
       = help: message: #[vtable] attribute should only be applied to trait or impl block

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

After this patch, the error reads:

    error: `#[vtable]` expects a `trait` or `impl`.
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:41:1
       |
    41 | const _: () = ();
       | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Now that `syn` and `quote` are available in the Kernel use them for the
`module!` proc-macro instead of the current string based proc-macro
approach.

Proc-macros written using `syn` are a lot more readable and thus easier
to maintain than proc-macros written using string manipulation. An
additional advantage of `syn` is the improved error reporting, here is
an example:

    module! {
        type: RustMinimal,
        name: "rust_minimal",
        author: "Rust for Linux Contributors",
        description: "Rust minimal sample",
        // we forgot to add a `license` field.
    }

Prior to this patch, the error reads:

    error: proc macro panicked
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:7:1
       |
    7  | / module! {
    8  | |     type: RustMinimal,
    9  | |     name: "rust_minimal",
    10 | |     author: "Rust for Linux Contributors",
    11 | |     description: "Rust minimal sample",
    12 | |     // license: "GPL",
    13 | | }
       | |_^
       |
       = help: message: Missing required key "license".

    error[E0425]: cannot find value `__LOG_PREFIX` in the crate root
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:21:9
       |
    21 |         pr_info!("Rust minimal sample (init)\n");
       |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
       |
       = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::print_macro` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pr_info` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error[E0425]: cannot find value `__LOG_PREFIX` in the crate root
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:22:9
       |
    22 |         pr_info!("Am I built-in? {}\n", !cfg!(MODULE));
       |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
       |
       = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::print_macro` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pr_info` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error[E0425]: cannot find value `__LOG_PREFIX` in the crate root
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:35:9
       |
    35 |         pr_info!("My numbers are {:?}\n", self.numbers);
       |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
       |
       = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::print_macro` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pr_info` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error[E0425]: cannot find value `__LOG_PREFIX` in the crate root
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:36:9
       |
    36 |         pr_info!("Rust minimal sample (exit)\n");
       |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not found in the crate root
       |
       = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::print_macro` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pr_info` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error: aborting due to 5 previous errors

After this patch, the error reads:

    error: Missing required key "license".
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:8:5
       |
    8  | /     type: RustMinimal,
    9  | |     name: "rust_minimal",
    10 | |     author: "Rust for Linux Contributors",
    11 | |     description: "Rust minimal sample",
       | |_______________________________________^

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Similar improvements in error quality apply to getting the order of the
fields wrong and giving non-ascii strings as values for fields where it
should be ascii-only.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Now that `syn` and `quote` are available in the Kernel use them for the
`Zeroable` derive macro instead of the current hybrid
proc-macro/declarative approach.

Proc-macros written using `syn` are a lot more readable and thus easier
to maintain than convoluted declarative macros. An additional advantage
of `syn` is the improved error reporting, here is an example:

    #[derive(Zeroable)]
    enum Foo {
        A,
        B
    }

Prior to this patch, the error reads:

    error: no rules expected the token `enum`
        --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:41:1
         |
    41   | enum Foo {
         | ^^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call
         |
    note: while trying to match `struct`
        --> rust/kernel/init/macros.rs:1373:22
         |
    1373 |             $vis:vis struct $name:ident
         |                      ^^^^^^

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

After this patch, the error reads:

    error: `Zeroable` can only be derived for structs.
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:41:1
       |
    41 | / enum Foo {
    42 | |     A,
    43 | |     B
    44 | | }
       | |_^

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Now that `syn` and `quote` are available in the Kernel use them for the
`#[pin_data]` proc-macro attribute instead of the current hybrid
proc-macro/declarative approach.

Proc-macros written using `syn` are a lot more readable and thus easier
to maintain than convoluted declarative macros. An additional advantage
of `syn` is the improved error reporting, here is an example:

    #[pin_data]
    struct Foo {
        x
    }

Prior to this patch, the error reads:

    error: expected `:`, found `}`
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:43:1
       |
    41 | struct Foo {
       |        --- while parsing this struct
    42 |     x
       |      - expected `:`
    43 | }
       | ^ unexpected token

    error: recursion limit reached while expanding `$crate::__pin_data!`
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:40:1
       |
    40 | #[pin_data]
       | ^^^^^^^^^^^
       |
       = help: consider increasing the recursion limit by adding a `#![recursion_limit = "256"]` attribute to your crate (`rust_minimal`)
       = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__pin_data` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `pin_data` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

After this patch, the error reads:

    error: expected `:`, found `}`
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:43:1
       |
    41 | struct Foo {
       |        --- while parsing this struct
    42 |     x
       |      - expected `:`
    43 | }
       | ^ unexpected token

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Now that `syn` and `quote` are available in the Kernel use them for the
`#[pinned_drop]` proc-macro attribute instead of the current hybrid
proc-macro/declarative approach.

Proc-macros written using `syn` are a lot more readable and thus easier
to maintain than convoluted declarative macros. An additional advantage
of `syn` is the improved error reporting, here is an example:

    #[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]
    struct Foo {}

    #[pinned_drop]
    impl PinnedDrop for Foo {}

Prior to this patch, the error reads:

    error: no rules expected the token `)`
       --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:43:1
        |
    43  | #[pinned_drop]
        | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no rules expected this token in macro call
        |
    note: while trying to match `fn`
       --> rust/kernel/init/macros.rs:511:13
        |
    511 |             fn drop($($sig:tt)*) {
        |             ^^
        = note: this error originates in the attribute macro `pinned_drop` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error[E0277]: the trait bound `Foo: PinnedDrop` is not satisfied
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:40:1
       |
    40 | #[pin_data(PinnedDrop)]
       | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       | |
       | the trait `PinnedDrop` is not implemented for `Foo`
       | required by a bound introduced by this call
       |
       = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__pin_data` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `pin_data` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

After this patch, the error reads:

    error: Expected exactly one function in the `PinnedDrop` impl.
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:44:25
       |
    44 | impl PinnedDrop for Foo {}
       |                         ^^

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Now that `syn` and `quote` are available in the Kernel use them for the
`__internal_init!` macro instead of the current hybrid
proc-macro/declarative approach.

Note that the new macro is called `primitive_init!`.

Proc-macros written using `syn` are a lot more readable and thus easier
to maintain than convoluted declarative macros. An additional advantage
of `syn` is the improved error reporting, here is an example:

When adding an additional `,` at the end of `..Zeroable::zeroed()`

    pin_init!(Foo {
        a: Bar,
        b <- Bar,
        c: Bar,
        d: Bar,
        ..Zeroable::zeroed(),
        //                  ^ this is the culprit!
    })

Prior to this patch, the error reads:

    error: no rules expected the token `,`
        --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:51:5
         |
    51   | /     pin_init!(Foo {
    52   | |         a: Bar,
    53   | |         b <- Bar,
    54   | |         c: Bar,
    55   | |         d: Bar,
    56   | |         ..Zeroable::zeroed(),
    57   | |     })
         | |______^ no rules expected this token in macro call
         |
    note: while trying to match `)`
        --> rust/kernel/init/macros.rs:1169:53
         |
    1169 |         @munch_fields($(..Zeroable::zeroed())? $(,)?),
         |                                                     ^
         = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__init_internal` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pin_init` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error: no rules expected the token `,`
        --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:51:5
         |
    51   | /     pin_init!(Foo {
    52   | |         a: Bar,
    53   | |         b <- Bar,
    54   | |         c: Bar,
    55   | |         d: Bar,
    56   | |         ..Zeroable::zeroed(),
    57   | |     })
         | |______^ no rules expected this token in macro call
         |
    note: while trying to match `)`
        --> rust/kernel/init/macros.rs:1273:49
         |
    1273 |         @munch_fields(..Zeroable::zeroed() $(,)?),
         |                                                 ^
         = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__init_internal` which comes from the expansion of the macro `pin_init` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)

    error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

After this patch, the error reads:

    error: unexpected token
      --> samples/rust/rust_minimal.rs:56:29
       |
    56 |         ..Zeroable::zeroed(),
       |                             ^

    error: aborting due to 1 previous error

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Only one helper function (`expect_punct`) is used by our proc-macros. So
remove all others and move `expect_punct` into concat_idents.rs.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
Since all initialization macros have been rewritten using `syn` and
`quote`, the `macros` module does no longer contain any code.
The only thing that is left is documentation that explains the expansion
of the initialization macros. This can now be directly observed in the
source code for the macros (found under `rust/macros`). Since the proc
macro code is much more readable than the declarative macro style.
Thus remove the expanded code.

Signed-off-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]>
@y86-dev y86-dev force-pushed the macro-syn-rewrite branch from 3b8d505 to 45d057b Compare April 10, 2024 11:03
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it make sense to make it as a feature for upstream syn?

@fbq
Copy link
Member

fbq commented Apr 10, 2024

Another Q out of curiosity: have you measured the affect of build time?

@y86-dev
Copy link
Member Author

y86-dev commented Apr 10, 2024

A very crude measurement:

  • rust-next: 241.03 secs
  • macro-syn-rewrite: 250.18 secs

If you time it as well, then maybe I can write about the increase in the cover letter :)

@fbq
Copy link
Member

fbq commented Apr 10, 2024

If you time it as well, then maybe I can write about the increase in the cover letter :)

Good point, here is the result from my machine:

(configured with ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --build_dir <dir> --make_options LLVM=1 --arch arm64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_RUST=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_SMP=y)

  • rust-next:

make ARCH=arm64 O=.kunit-next --jobs=40 LLVM=1 975.55s user 62.11s system 2159% cpu 48.054 total

  • macro-syn-rewrite

make ARCH=arm64 O=.kunit-syn --jobs=40 LLVM=1 1022.36s user 62.38s system 2243% cpu 48.357 total

@ojeda ojeda force-pushed the rust-next branch 3 times, most recently from c9b5ce6 to ce1c54f Compare October 9, 2024 22:37
@ojeda ojeda force-pushed the rust-next branch 3 times, most recently from 9ee7197 to 6ce162a Compare October 15, 2024 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants