Add support for np.cbrt on cosmo arrays #212
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I also had to edit an unrelated conversion test that was using a protected attribute of the astropy cosmology object that appears to have been removed in the 7.0.0 release... (tests would fail with python 3.11 and 3.12) |
kyleaoman
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that unyt supports
np.cbrt, since version 3.0.2, we can add support in swiftsimio as well.We can then also get rid of the hack I used in the nearest neighbours slicing backend (which b.t.w. contained a bug in for the case where no
volumesdataset is present in the gas dataset).