Add TablePreferences entity

[lhellebr]

Description of changes

Added TablePreferences entity.

Functional demonstration

Shouldn't cause regression, this test uses search and hasn't changed:

$ pytest tests/foreman/api/test_contentview.py::test_positive_admin_user_actions
================================================================= test session starts =================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.9.16, pytest-7.3.1, pluggy-1.0.0 -- /home/lhellebr/git/robottelo/venv/bin/python
Mandatory Requirements Available: jinja2==3.1.2 broker[docker]==0.3.2 pytest-xdist==3.3.1 wrapanapi==3.5.15 requests==2.31.0 pytest-reportportal==5.1.8
Optional Requirements Available: pre-commit==3.3.2 redis==4.5.5 manage>=0.1.13 sphinx==7.0.1
cachedir: .pytest_cache
shared_function enabled - OFF - scope:  - storage: file
rootdir: /home/lhellebr/git/robottelo
configfile: pytest.ini
plugins: cov-3.0.0, services-2.2.1, xdist-3.2.1, reportportal-5.1.7, mock-3.10.0, ibutsu-2.2.4
collected 1 item                                                                                                                                      

tests/foreman/api/test_contentview.py::test_positive_admin_user_actions PASSED                                                                  [100%]

================================================================= 1 passed in 56.59s ==================================================================

The same happens when I change that test to use ServerConfig explicitly, and don't change anything else (so it doesn't specify the new argument).

This is a new test using it:

$ pytest tests/foreman/api/test_user.py::TestUser::test_positive_table_preferences
================================================================= test session starts =================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.9.16, pytest-7.3.1, pluggy-1.0.0 -- /home/lhellebr/git/robottelo/venv/bin/python
Mandatory Requirements Available: jinja2==3.1.2 pytest-xdist==3.3.1 broker[docker]==0.3.2 requests==2.31.0 wrapanapi==3.5.15 pytest-reportportal==5.1.8
Optional Requirements Available: redis==4.5.5 pre-commit==3.3.2 manage>=0.1.13 sphinx==7.0.1
cachedir: .pytest_cache
shared_function enabled - OFF - scope:  - storage: file
rootdir: /home/lhellebr/git/robottelo
configfile: pytest.ini
plugins: cov-3.0.0, services-2.2.1, xdist-3.2.1, reportportal-5.1.7, mock-3.10.0, ibutsu-2.2.4
collected 1 item                                                                                                                                      

tests/foreman/api/test_user.py::TestUser::test_positive_create_with_username 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDB set_trace (IO-capturing turned off) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> /home/lhellebr/git/robottelo/tests/foreman/api/test_user.py(428)test_positive_create_with_username()
-> assert hasattr(tp, 'name')
(Pdb) c

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PDB continue (IO-capturing resumed) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
PASSED                                                             [100%]

================================================================= 1 passed in 58.13s ==================================================================

[lhellebr]

make docs-html fails and it also happens in master -> failure unrelated

[lhellebr]

The dependent robottelo PR has been merged. Can we also merge this?

[jyejare]

The make docs failure is related to the change in the table-preferences entity only, please fix it !

Also, update unit tests for the the new class!

[lhellebr]

Yes, this failure is a real one, I'll fix it. Previously, already the test invocation has been failing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 95.45% and project coverage change: +0.04 🎉

Comparison is base (cfed8c9) 92.18% compared to head (7b85ca2) 92.22%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #928      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.18%   92.22%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines        3031     3050      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         2794     2813      +19     
  Misses        237      237              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
nailgun/entity_mixins.py	95.95% <66.66%> (ø)
nailgun/entities.py	91.28% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[jyejare]

Patch coverage is only 26% , so you should now add unit tests.

[lhellebr]

Yes, I was working on it, it just took a little while.
The report doesn't seem to be updated yet (let's wait a little bit, I don't know how to force refresh) but I think it should be ok now.

[sambible]

Any reason for not using PRT? Looks good either way. Also, you aren't alone on forgetting to add tests for Nailgun PRs :)

[lhellebr]

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_contentview.py -k test_positive_admin_user_actions

[lhellebr]

Who knows why I still don't see any PRT results. But I think we can merge. The test using this is merged already!

[omkarkhatavkar]

Who knows why I still don't see any PRT results. But I think we can merge. The test using this is merged already!

PRT results get overridden once you add a new commit in the code.

[omkarkhatavkar]

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_contentview.py -k test_positive_admin_user_actions