Skip to content

Conversation

@SC-Jerome-S
Copy link
Contributor

@SC-Jerome-S SC-Jerome-S commented Oct 23, 2025

From: https://scalingo.atlassian.net/browse/IRQ-446
Internal procedure change: https://github.com/Scalingo/specifications/pull/486

Overview:

This commit significantly improves the documentation for accessing the SecNumCloud (osc-secnum-fr1) region by clarifying the domain whitelisting procedures and access requirements for users.

1. Enhanced user access section

Clarified Language and improved Clarity: made it clear that user accounts must be explicitly allow-listed before accessing the region

2. Refined "Pre-conditions" language

Enhanced the description for legitimate access reasons, domain verification and added requirement that company domains must already be associated with existing applications in the region.

3. Restructured access procedures

Streamlined process for users from companies with existing SecNumCloud presence
Access without whitelisted domain: Clear process for new domain requests
Domain declaration and regularization

Objectives:

Reduced Support Burden: clearer procedures reduce unclear requests - better explanation of verification requirements
Compliance documentation: better alignment with SecNumCloud security requirements

Copy link
Contributor

@yanjost yanjost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a mixup in the writing : it cannot be "the user" and "your company", you have to choose

@SC-Jerome-S
Copy link
Contributor Author

There is a mixup in the writing : it cannot be "the user" and "your company", you have to choose

It was redacted this way before: neutral way "The user" for pre-conditions, and direct way "Your company" for procedure
Should I change the initial style?

SC-Jerome-S and others added 3 commits October 27, 2025 17:18
No specific reason, I agree with your recommendation

Co-authored-by: Étienne M. <[email protected]>
Agree

Co-authored-by: Étienne M. <[email protected]>
Agree

Co-authored-by: Étienne M. <[email protected]>
@SC-Jerome-S SC-Jerome-S requested review from EtienneM and yanjost and removed request for EtienneM October 27, 2025 17:17
Copy link
Member

@EtienneM EtienneM left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you also update the PR title to mention "allow-listing" rather than "whitelisting"?

@SC-Jerome-S SC-Jerome-S changed the title [IRQ-446] Answering the need to clarify whitelisting domain procedure [IRQ-446] Answering the need to clarify allow-listing domain procedure Oct 28, 2025
Sure - you're right, sorry (my fault, I missed it also)

Co-authored-by: Étienne M. <[email protected]>
@SC-Jerome-S
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can you also update the PR title to mention "allow-listing" rather than "whitelisting"?

Thank you, you've got sharp eyes!

Copy link
Contributor

@yanjost yanjost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SC-Jerome-S SC-Jerome-S merged commit 2c73999 into master Nov 4, 2025
3 checks passed
@SC-Jerome-S SC-Jerome-S deleted the fix/IRQ-446/SNC-domain-whitelist-availability branch November 4, 2025 16:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants