Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: standardise workflows using SciML's reusable workflows #126

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

thazhemadam
Copy link
Member

Update the workflows in this repository to use SciML's reusable workflows.
This is part of a larger effort to standardise the SciML's CI workflows for more generic and common requirements, to keep the workflows uniform and easier to maintain.

@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from 1904970 to 6bc05de Compare April 30, 2024 15:17
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.63%. Comparing base (f9ffcff) to head (3931204).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #126      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.47%   82.63%   -0.85%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         357      357              
==========================================
- Hits          298      295       -3     
- Misses         59       62       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from 6bc05de to 3931204 Compare April 30, 2024 15:44
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 6e86e91 into master May 1, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the at/use-reusable-workflows branch May 1, 2024 05:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants