Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add spellcheck CI #295

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023
Merged

add spellcheck CI #295

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member

I left one mistake unfixed to see if it detects it.

@ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member Author

Seems to work nicely with low false positives.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (8e8dad8) 93.07% compared to head (69b2f43) 93.07%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #295   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.07%   93.07%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        2065     2065           
=======================================
  Hits         1922     1922           
  Misses        143      143           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Wow, that's amazing. I assume you'll get that everywhere? That's going to help a ton, I am terrible at spelling.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 657c549 into SciML:master Nov 28, 2023
12 checks passed
@ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member Author

Yes it is going everywhere this weekend.

@ArnoStrouwen ArnoStrouwen deleted the spellcheck branch November 28, 2023 16:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants