Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: remake initialization problem during DAE initialization #2209

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix: remake initialization problem during DAE initialization #2209

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions Project.toml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ SparseArrays = "2f01184e-e22b-5df5-ae63-d93ebab69eaf"
SparseDiffTools = "47a9eef4-7e08-11e9-0b38-333d64bd3804"
StaticArrayInterface = "0d7ed370-da01-4f52-bd93-41d350b8b718"
StaticArrays = "90137ffa-7385-5640-81b9-e52037218182"
SymbolicIndexingInterface = "2efcf032-c050-4f8e-a9bb-153293bab1f5"
TruncatedStacktraces = "781d530d-4396-4725-bb49-402e4bee1e77"

[compat]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ SparseArrays = "1.9"
SparseDiffTools = "2.3"
StaticArrayInterface = "1.2"
StaticArrays = "1.0"
SymbolicIndexingInterface = "0.3.16"
TruncatedStacktraces = "1.2"
julia = "1.10"

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions src/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ using ExponentialUtilities

using NonlinearSolve

using SymbolicIndexingInterface

# Required by temporary fix in not in-place methods with 12+ broadcasts
# `MVector` is used by Nordsieck forms
import StaticArrays: SArray, MVector, SVector, @SVector, StaticArray, MMatrix, SA
Expand Down
11 changes: 10 additions & 1 deletion src/initialize_dae.jl
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -134,7 +134,16 @@
function _initialize_dae!(integrator, prob::Union{ODEProblem, DAEProblem},
alg::OverrideInit, isinplace::Union{Val{true}, Val{false}})
initializeprob = prob.f.initializeprob

if initializeprob.f.sys !== nothing && prob.f.sys !== nothing
initu0vars = variable_symbols(initializeprob)
initu0order = variable_index.((initializeprob,), initu0vars)

Check warning on line 139 in src/initialize_dae.jl

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

src/initialize_dae.jl#L137-L139 

Added lines #L137 - L139 were not covered by tests
# Variable symbols are not guaranteed to be in order
invpermute!(initu0vars, initu0order)
initu0 = getu(prob.f.initializeprob, initu0vars)(prob)
initp = remake_buffer(initializeprob, parameter_values(initializeprob),

Check warning on line 143 in src/initialize_dae.jl

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

src/initialize_dae.jl#L141-L143 

Added lines #L141 - L143 were not covered by tests
Dict(sym => getu(prob, sym)(prob) for sym in parameter_symbols(initializeprob)))
initializeprob = remake(initializeprob; u0 = initu0, p = initp)

Check warning on line 145 in src/initialize_dae.jl

View check run for this annotation

Codecov / codecov/patch

src/initialize_dae.jl#L145 

Added line #L145 was not covered by tests
Comment on lines +137 to +145
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure this all makes sense. First of all, it shouldn't come from prob since you can have callback reinitialization, so it should come from integrator.u. But also, this is just very heavy and dynamic: can't we just add a initializeprobsetu in the ODEFunction which sets up the initalizeprob based on integrator.u, and then also have one for p that updates based on any p updates (and also this should update t, which is a psuedo-parameter of the initialization)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense. Since this involves SciMLBase changes (changing ODEFunction and DAEFunction fields) I'll merge this PR with #2228 since that depends on this PR and modifies those structs anyway.

end
# If it doesn't have autodiff, assume it comes from symbolic system like ModelingToolkit
# Since then it's the case of not a DAE but has initializeprob
# In which case, it should be differentiable
Expand Down
Loading