Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated jprq (jprq.io) package for Scoop #6593

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

anorprogrammer
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds a new manifest for jprq version 2.4.

Project URL: jprq GitHub Repository

Changes:

  • Added jprq.json to the manifest.
  • Included download links for both 64bit and 32bit architectures.
  • Added bin and shortcuts configuration.

This package provides secure public URLs for local servers.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2025

All changes look good.

Wait for review from human collaborators.

jprq

  • Description
  • License
  • Hashes
  • Checkver
  • Autoupdate

@anorprogrammer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can someone review this for me?

@niheaven
Copy link
Member

niheaven commented Mar 3, 2025

/verify

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2025

All changes look good.

Wait for review from human collaborators.

jprq

  • Description
  • License
  • Hashes
  • Checkver
  • Autoupdate

@niheaven
Copy link
Member

niheaven commented Mar 3, 2025

  • You should run bin/checkver.ps1 -f first
  • Use a new branch other than master to commit PR

@anorprogrammer anorprogrammer mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2025
4 tasks
@anorprogrammer
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have addressed the requested changes:

  • ✅ Ran bin/checkver.ps1 -f to verify the manifest.
  • ✅ Created a new branch instead of committing to master.

Here is the new PR: #6597.

This PR replaces the old one. Please review it when you have time. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants