Upgrade styled-components to fix security vulnerabilities

[sumansaurabh]

User description

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the yarn dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

• package.json
• yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

	Issue	Score
	Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs SNYK-JS-BABELTRAVERSE-5962462	786

---

Important

• Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
• Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
• This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

---

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic

---

Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

---

Description

• Upgraded styled-components to address security vulnerabilities.
• This change reduces the risk associated with the identified vulnerability.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Dependencies	package.json Upgrade styled-components to version 6.1.0                              package.json Updated styled-components from version 5.3.0 to 6.1.0. +1/-1

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are straightforward and involve upgrading a package version to address security vulnerabilities.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Execute tests to confirm no regressions occur after the upgrade After upgrading, run tests to ensure that the new version of styled-components does not introduce any regressions in your application. package.json [51] -"styled-components": "^6.1.0", +"styled-components": "^6.1.0", // Run tests post-upgrade to check for regressions Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Running tests after an upgrade is crucial to ensure that no regressions occur, making this a significant suggestion for maintaining code quality.	8
	Review release notes for potential breaking changes in the upgraded package It may be beneficial to check the release notes for styled-components version 6.1.0 for any breaking changes that could affect your application. package.json [51] -"styled-components": "^6.1.0", +"styled-components": "^6.1.0", // Check release notes for breaking changes Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Checking release notes for breaking changes is a good practice, but it does not directly address a specific issue in the code.	7
Possible issue	Verify compatibility of the upgraded package with existing dependencies Consider verifying the compatibility of the new version of styled-components with other dependencies to avoid potential issues. package.json [51] -"styled-components": "^6.1.0", +"styled-components": "^6.1.0", // Ensure compatibility with other dependencies Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: While it's important to ensure compatibility with other dependencies, this suggestion is more of a precautionary measure rather than a critical issue.	7
Maintainability	Align versioning strategy with project update policy for better control Ensure that the versioning strategy used (caret ^) aligns with your project's update policy to avoid unexpected major version upgrades in the future. package.json [51] -"styled-components": "^6.1.0", +"styled-components": "~6.1.0", // Consider using tilde for more control over updates Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: This suggestion addresses maintainability concerns, but changing from caret to tilde is not always necessary and depends on the project's update policy.	6