Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support RISCV-64 #34

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Support RISCV-64 #34

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ziyao233
Copy link

This pull request adds support for RISCV-64. WIP now.

@ziyao233 ziyao233 changed the title WIP: Support RISCV-64 Support RISCV-64 Mar 24, 2023
@ziyao233
Copy link
Author

Now the fork is ok to build on Debian in RISC-V QEMU. Tests are passed.
Additional tests for float/double typed arguments are also added.

@Snaipe
Copy link
Owner

Snaipe commented Mar 27, 2023

Can you update the README to add the new architecture support?

It'd be nice if this could be tested automatically; speaking of, it looks like the CI is broken, let me fix it first so that we can test this properly.

@ziyao233
Copy link
Author

README.md has been updated :)

@ziyao233
Copy link
Author

ziyao233 commented Sep 9, 2023

Any update about the CI?

@romancardenas
Copy link

Hey! any news on this? I'm now trying to compile ROS2 for RISC-V and having this package available for RISC-V would make my life way easier :D

@romancardenas
Copy link

@ziyao233 please, could you open a PR on https://github.com/ros2/Mimick ? Looks like ROS 2 uses that fork

@ziyao233
Copy link
Author

ziyao233 commented Feb 9, 2024

Hey! any news on this? I'm now trying to compile ROS2 for RISC-V and having this package available for RISC-V would make my life way easier :D

The maintainer of this repo does not give me more updates.

if a PR on the fork of ROS2 is helpful, I will do that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants