Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(indemnite-licenciement): fusion de la CC 1391 dans la 275 #5567

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

maxgfr
Copy link
Member

@maxgfr maxgfr commented Jan 15, 2024

fix #5329
fix #5595

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

j'ai ajouté ça suite aux retours métiers de romain, car des soucis de missing vars sur la branche de test

Comment on lines 193 to +197
contrat salarié . indemnité de licenciement . date de notification:
valeur: non
valeur: 01/01/2024 # mettre une valeur par défaut pour éviter les erreurs liées aux missing-args

contrat salarié . indemnité de licenciement . date d'entrée:
valeur: non
valeur: 01/01/2024 # mettre une valeur par défaut pour éviter les erreurs liées aux missing-args
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sinon les missings vars ne fonctionnent pas

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

car cette question est priviligiée sur d'autre question ce qui fait bugger la page

Copy link

@maxgfr maxgfr merged commit f39c76e into dev Jan 29, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@maxgfr maxgfr deleted the maxgfr/il-275 branch January 29, 2024 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants