Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to explicit functional interface #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

ah-OOG-ah
Copy link
Contributor

While the original lambda is valid and should work, it causes problems in some development environments for mods depending on Jouneymap, because the remapper implodes on the lambda. This makes it explicit.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jul 12, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Member

@mysticdrew mysticdrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is the remapper failing? This should be valid.
Maybe because it has issues with the synthetic method bytecode?

@mysticdrew mysticdrew merged commit 0322efa into TeamJM:master Jul 12, 2024
2 checks passed
@ah-OOG-ah ah-OOG-ah deleted the fix-lambda branch December 29, 2024 10:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants