Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions for SHARE-Seq #22

Open
SukuraAddiction opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Questions for SHARE-Seq #22

SukuraAddiction opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@SukuraAddiction
Copy link

Hi Dr. Chen,
Thank you for sharing detailed information about the various single-cell sequencing technologies! I’ve been studying the SHARE-seq method and have a question regarding the design of the Mosaic End (ME) primer. In the paper, the ME primer is described as follows:
image
I noticed that this sequence is 15bp long, while the Mosaic End (ME) is generally 19bp. Could you please explain why a shorter sequence was chosen in this case? Additionally, I thought the use of 3ddC would block the oligonucleotide from extending further, but I didn't see this effect clearly represented in the technical roadmap you shared on GitHub. Also, considering the ME sequence provided, should the Tn5 schematic also be updated to reflect this?
Thank you for your time and consideration. Your insights would be greatly appreciated!
Best regards,
Elena

@dbrg77
Copy link
Collaborator

dbrg77 commented Aug 22, 2024

Hi Elena,

Thank you for those questions.

In terms of the 15 bp Blocked_ME_Comp, you are correct. I think many people, us included, use 19 bp when assembling our own Tn5. I did not notice there ME_Comp was only 15 bp when I created the page, so good catch! The full 19-bp ME is still present in the top strand, but maybe the 15-bp dsDNA is already enough for the transposase Tn5 to bind and perform tagmentation. I don't have a clear answer, and we may give it a test in the future.

I just realised that they have now put the full protocol on protocols.io here: https://www.protocols.io/view/share-seq-protocol-v2-2-81wgbx1oylpk/v2

Do you want to ask this question there to see if they have more insights? I will update the Tn5 schematic in the Github once we got confirmation.

For the modified oligos, I kind of ignore all modifications in all methods here to make things simpler. I listed them in the adapter sequence section, and omit them during the roadmap, which makes alignment easier. I assume people who need to know those details would read the paper and get the rationale behind the modifications from the paper.

You just reminded me that I forgot to added the modified Blocked_ME_Comp in the SHARE-seq page. I will add that soon.

I hope this is clear.

Thank you for your feedback and let me know if yo have further questions.

Regards,
Xi

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants