Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Update endorsement chain page to support remark #941

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

nghaninn
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

What is the background of this pull request?
Update endorsement chain page to support remark

Changes

  • What are the changes made in this pull request?
    • Updated Endorsement Chain

@nghaninn nghaninn requested a review from rongquan1 October 16, 2024 09:14
@rongquan1 rongquan1 merged commit 76930d7 into v5 Oct 17, 2024
4 checks passed
@rongquan1 rongquan1 deleted the feat/tt-267-update-endorsement-chain-page branch October 17, 2024 03:17
nghaninn added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2024
* feat: Update endorsement chain page to support remark (#941)

* feat: v5 update endorement chain

* chore: fix test case

* chore: resolve type error

* chore: resolve package-lock

* chore: resolve test error

* chore: resolve test error

* chore: update cli package version

* chore: add missing os in package-lock

* chore: revert test fixes

* chore: update amoy rpcUrl

---------

Co-authored-by: nghaninn <[email protected]>

* chore: update test

* chore: resolve package-lock

* feat: add rejection functions

* fix: add e2e test cases

* fix: adjust UI mark

* fix: adjust UI mark

* fix: tests check types

* fix: update test cases and resolve synpress error

---------

Co-authored-by: Ng Han Inn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: nghaninn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ng Han Inn <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Rishabh Singh <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants