Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore(SETI-1159): Add construction_worker: ci standard workflow #13

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2021

Conversation

seti-tf
Copy link
Contributor

@seti-tf seti-tf commented May 20, 2021

⚠️ As a code owner, you are expected to review and merge (the bot will not merge by itself).
This PR adds the Typeform's CI Standard check to the PR that will do:

  • a JIRA link check
  • the Secret scan check

This PR will help you with gain 2 badges:

  • Secrets Scan check (mandatory for Q2)
  • CI Standard Checks (informative for Q2, mandatory for Q3)

This means that if you already have a a secrets detection workflow / part of travis in your repo, you can safely delete it without affecting the badge ratio.
This PR should have deleted the 'secrets-scan.yml' from your repo.

Note: if you have the secrets-detection workflow in pending after deletion, it means that it's a mandatory check in a protected branch.
Please go to Settings -> Branches -> Edit Protected Branch -> Uncheck secrets-scan

To learn more about this standard, go here: https://www.notion.so/typeform/Repository-s-automated-checks-e03b09e5d71542e595f9dd128f4fe917

🤖 I'm a bot, if you have any doubts, contact #seti-team on slack.

@seti-tf seti-tf requested a review from a team May 20, 2021 18:10
@picsoung picsoung merged commit 8167323 into master Jun 9, 2021
@Thr44 Thr44 changed the title chore: [SETI-1159] 👷 add ci standard workflow Chore(SETI-1159): Add construction_worker: ci standard workflow Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants