Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CURA-12352 Different minimum layer time for layers that contain overhangs #20039

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wawanbreton
Copy link
Contributor

@wawanbreton wawanbreton commented Dec 16, 2024

CURA-12352

⚠️ Depends on CURA-11966, so don't review until merged

Comes with Ultimaker/CuraEngine#2187

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Test Results

23 370 tests  ±0   23 368 ✅ ±0   44s ⏱️ ±0s
     1 suites ±0        2 💤 ±0 
     1 files   ±0        0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e6d2281. ± Comparison against base commit 75cf32c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@@ -8401,15 +8426,13 @@
"value": "support_angle",
"settable_per_mesh": true
},
"wall_overhang_speed_factor":
"wall_overhang_speed_factors":
Copy link
Member

@rburema rburema Jan 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can't really change settings like this without doing an upgrader.

People will have values like 2.5 for a setting that no longer exists, that should be altered to [3] for this 'new' setting. (In other words: Older files should still work as expected.)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The usual process (as far as I understood) is to note the required setting update in the dedicated ticket (in this case, CURA-12359) and write the whole upgrade script at once. But as you implemented it, it's also good :)

@wawanbreton wawanbreton marked this pull request as ready for review January 20, 2025 09:45
@wawanbreton
Copy link
Contributor Author

I do approve this PR, but I can't because I created it 😄

Copy link
Contributor

@HellAholic HellAholic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems legit :P

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants