Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better method mutations in Spring fuzzing #2541

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 24, 2023

Conversation

EgorkaKulikov
Copy link
Collaborator

@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov commented Aug 21, 2023

Description

Fixes # (2502)

Also significantly improves method mutations in fuzzing (see code for more details).

How to test

Difficult to test: just verify in debug that the behaviour of the mentioned code has changed.

Self-check list

  • I've set the proper labels for my PR (at least, for category and component).
  • PR title and description are clear and intelligible.
  • I've added enough comments to my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • The functionality I've repaired, changed or added is covered with automated tests.
  • Manual tests have been provided optionally.
  • The documentation for the functionality I've been working on is up-to-date.

@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov added comp-fuzzing Issue is related to the fuzzing ctg-bug-fix PR is fixing a bug comp-spring Issue is related to Spring projects support labels Aug 21, 2023
@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov changed the title Correct a condiition to define field mutations by methods Better method mutations in Spring fuzzing Aug 22, 2023
@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov merged commit 0587302 into main Aug 24, 2023
35 checks passed
@EgorkaKulikov EgorkaKulikov deleted the egor/correct_projectors_in_method_mutations branch August 24, 2023 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-fuzzing Issue is related to the fuzzing comp-spring Issue is related to Spring projects support ctg-bug-fix PR is fixing a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ModificationTransformationMode.ReadAndWrite misses some field reads
2 participants