Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: traffic limits for enterprise-payg #8596

Merged

Conversation

Tymek
Copy link
Member

@Tymek Tymek commented Oct 30, 2024

About the changes

image

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 30, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-monorepo-frontend ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 31, 2024 9:21am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
unleash-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 31, 2024 9:21am

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails

Scanned Files

@Tymek Tymek requested review from ivarconr and nunogois October 30, 2024 13:43
@Tymek Tymek force-pushed the cto-82-unleash-update-unleash-to-only-show-53m-included-requests branch from 6dadd69 to f6ab56a Compare October 30, 2024 13:44
@Tymek Tymek marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2024 13:44
Copy link
Member

@nunogois nunogois left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a clean approach!
Shouldn't we add the feature flag in experimental.ts as well?

Since it's still just being introduced, maybe we can rename it to camelCase so it's consistent with our other flags, i.e. enterprisePAYG instead of enterprise-payg. It's also a bit detached from enterprise in its implementation, even though that's only a detail, but perhaps we could name it something more generic like paygBilling or something. WDYT?

Copy link
Member

@nunogois nunogois left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Tymek Tymek merged commit 1c95276 into main Oct 31, 2024
12 checks passed
@Tymek Tymek deleted the cto-82-unleash-update-unleash-to-only-show-53m-included-requests branch October 31, 2024 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants