Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Standardize "Good" "Bad" approach #63

Open
alestiago opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Standardize "Good" "Bad" approach #63

alestiago opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@alestiago
Copy link
Contributor

alestiago commented Sep 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

There are currently two approaches used to document "Good" and "Bad" examples:

I'm not sure which is one is preferred, but it should be standard across our documentation.

Screenshot

  • Approach 1:
    CleanShot 2024-09-02 at 15 45 34

  • Approach 2:
    CleanShot 2024-09-02 at 15 44 42
@alestiago alestiago mentioned this issue Sep 3, 2024
Merged
@alestiago
Copy link
Contributor Author

According to this suggestion (#64 (comment)), the tab approach seems to be the now go-to approach.

@jolexxa
Copy link
Member

jolexxa commented Sep 3, 2024

@alestiago ah, thought I had gotten all of them when I was cleaning up the other day. Thank you for pointing out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jolexxa @alestiago