Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated README.md to reflect nvim path differences #908

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Updated README.md to reflect nvim path differences #908

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mikeyjk
Copy link

@mikeyjk mikeyjk commented Aug 5, 2019

I've used vundle for years, and love it, thanks to everyone involved.

Just setting up a new dev environment and figured I may as well capture the neovim path differences here.

I don't know much about the vim/neovim/plugin community, so hopefully this is a reasonable change/ isn't a faux pas of some kind.

I've used vundle for years, and love it, thanks to everyone involved.

Just setting up a new dev environment and figured I may as well capture the neovim path differences here.

I'm not particularly savvy of the vim/neovim/plugin dev community, so hopefully this is a reasonable change/ isn't a faux pas of some kind.
@mikeyjk
Copy link
Author

mikeyjk commented Aug 23, 2019

Is this super silly or something :)?
There is this project: https://github.com/Shougo/neobundle.vim
But it doesn't seem to be actively developed.
Vundle works fine with nvim.

@ryanoasis
Copy link
Member

@mikeyjk I probably made a poor attempt to mark this PR to look at later. Obviously it wasn't very effective on my part

Overall the change looks good, I think some minor formatting could be changed but that's all

@mikeyjk
Copy link
Author

mikeyjk commented Sep 16, 2019

Yeah awesome, if it's quicker to give me a rough idea of what to change the formatting to, please let me know. Otherwise I'll leave it - thanks!

@mikeyjk
Copy link
Author

mikeyjk commented Jan 4, 2022

👀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants