-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Events: Use a showcase like approach for the events list/archive #1124
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
30 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
44371c8
Try using a php block that queries.
StevenDufresne 1a5adca
Example query filtering.
StevenDufresne a43b837
add block build script.
StevenDufresne d568afe
Add the patterns
StevenDufresne cf3a3f4
Hook in another filter.
StevenDufresne 12b7c06
Rename template.
StevenDufresne 29f8205
Some minor updates.
StevenDufresne c73ed57
Add the month filter
StevenDufresne 9cc0b23
Add in Past Events template
iandunn 5b413d4
update menu links
iandunn 8404ff7
pass filter values to map block
iandunn 5819e91
Add map block. Isn't yet connected to country list.
StevenDufresne e636d34
Update copy.
StevenDufresne 3e7d9c2
Harmonize spacing.
StevenDufresne 9662871
Make font size smaller for past events.
StevenDufresne 1ee70b1
Update post title spacing.
StevenDufresne 76c027c
Update search layout.
StevenDufresne 55b279c
fix upcoming spacing.
StevenDufresne 55b4e41
Update the filters to show the item count on archives.
StevenDufresne 7b10fbb
Fix the template widths.
StevenDufresne d3db670
Update event list UI.
StevenDufresne c26787d
Update the menu text based on designs.
StevenDufresne 855fa57
combine build/watch scripts for convenience
iandunn 0889f6f
use get_events for filtering and caching
iandunn 303e77f
add missing template part
iandunn 0de639a
update upcoming events slug
iandunn b0c2278
add country filter values
iandunn 9908d41
add all months
iandunn 8796cbb
schedule crons to prime cache
iandunn 47fdebd
apply coding standards
iandunn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it'd be accurate to change this. That number is the # of meetup.com group members (plus WordCamp attendees, but that doesn't affect it significantly), and the number of attendees is likely to be significantly different.
If we really want to say attendees, we could try to estimate the # based on RSVPs, but I don't think it'd be accurate enough to publish. IMO members is the most accurate/meaningful stat we can use here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for that context. I was going off the designs. I'll provide that feedback and switch it back to members today.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I definitely see what you mean. I'm just unsure if "members", despite being accurate, is the right term to use. It does have hints of exclusivity and seems directly tied to Meetup.com's terminology, not necessarily WordPress's. When "members" are talked about in WP ways, I've typically seen it explicitly contextualized as "community members"... which is too long (as usual 😅).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So summing up the problem, if we use "attendees", we will be underrepresenting the actual number of attendees.
I also find
members
to be an inclusive term. What about justpeople
?Simple is as simple does.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
people
is accurate and simple, for sure. Also feels too generic/passive. (and what of all the pet contributors? 😎)I'd suggest one of the following (for now), with my preference being 1:
participants
: technically accurate, the bar for participation can be fluid, i.e., as low as just becoming a member on Meetup.com or as high as attending and contributing at a WordCamp.contributors
: perhaps not entirely inclusive/accurate, but directly related to the project and also used elsewhere on the page already.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 that's a good point, we definitely don't want it to feel exclusionary. I like
participants
, thanks for thinking of that!I think the problem with
attendees
is more that it _over_represents the number of attendees, since so many people join a meetup group, and even RSVP to an event, but don't actually show up. IMO accuracy is the most important factor, and it'd be better to err on the side of too low than too high. My concern is that inflating stats, even unintentionally, would erode trust.I'll go ahead and update it to
participants
since we're coming up on the deadline to launch, but I'm happy to continue discussing it if y'all would like to iterate on that, or make any changes.