Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CP-1928 Increase WebSocket integration test delays #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2016

Conversation

evanweible-wf
Copy link
Contributor

Issue

We are seeing some intermittent failures for the SockJS integration tests on our Travis CI builds.

Solution

Increase the delays in the WebSocket integration test suites. This isn't ideal since it increases the build time, but I've created an issue to do a full test audit for performance and optimization: #151.

Testing

  • CI passes several times in a row (I'll manually re-run the builds a few times).

Code Review

@trentgrover-wf
@maxwellpeterson-wf
@dustinlessard-wf
@jayudey-wf
@sebastianmalysa-wf
@srinivasdhanwada-wf

@evanweible-wf evanweible-wf added this to the 2.5.1 milestone Jun 15, 2016
@trentgrover-wf
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 16, 2016

Current coverage is 99.51%

Merging #152 into master will not change coverage

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by 13216f6...407aadd

@maxwellpeterson-wf
Copy link
Member

Have you tried increasing it less? Maybe to 150 or even 125 instead of doubling it?

@maxwellpeterson-wf
Copy link
Member

+1

@jayudey-wf jayudey-wf changed the title Increase WebSocket integration test delays CP-1928 Increase WebSocket integration test delays Jun 16, 2016
@evanweible-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jayudey-wf ready for merge

@jayudey-wf
Copy link
Contributor

jayudey-wf commented Jun 16, 2016

QA Resource Approval: +10

Merging into master.

@jayudey-wf jayudey-wf merged commit 9f0e2d5 into master Jun 16, 2016
@evanweible-wf evanweible-wf deleted the sockjs-test-timeouts branch July 22, 2016 22:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants