Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed ERT firmware packaging issue #8190

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fquinner
Copy link

When proving the user's own sched*.bin binaries, the ERTFW_FILES variable contains the required ERT firmware files but it is only used in one target firmware location in the target install directory structure. This fix ensure it is also added to the directory expected by the xrt base packages.

Problem solved by the commit

RPM package created does not contain the sched bin files in /opt/xilinx/xrt/share/fw. This causes the xrt base RPM to fail to build the required XSA shells so they in turn silently fail.

Bug / issue (if any) fixed, which PR introduced the bug, how it was discovered

Discovered while trying to set up a Xilinx card with XRT for the first time.

@gbuildx
Copy link
Collaborator

gbuildx commented May 21, 2024

fquinner - is not a collaborator
Can XRT admins please validate PR

@gbuildx
Copy link
Collaborator

gbuildx commented May 21, 2024

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

When proving the user's own sched*.bin binaries, the ERTFW_FILES variable contains the required ERT firmware files but it is only used in one target firmware location in the target install directory structure. This fix ensure it is also added to the directory expected by the xrt base packages.

Signed-off-by: Frank Quinn <[email protected]>
@gbuildx
Copy link
Collaborator

gbuildx commented May 21, 2024

fquinner - is not a collaborator
Can XRT admins please validate PR

@chvamshi-xilinx
Copy link
Collaborator

\build

@gbuildx
Copy link
Collaborator

gbuildx commented May 29, 2024

fquinner - is not a collaborator
Can XRT admins please validate PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants